It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Jdawg9909
Also like the Op says, what better way for the governments to keep tabs on whistleblowers. I wonder how many posters to Wikileaks have ended up missing or worse because of the info they have shared.
Originally posted by muzzleflash
To the posters like SDog, Jdog (funny how names are so similar, as are their viewpoints)
Originally posted by schrodingers dog
Originally posted by schrodingers dog
Originally posted by muzzleflash
To the posters like SDog, Jdog (funny how names are so similar, as are their viewpoints)
lol, once again you astonish us with your sound reasoning!
Of course never mind that Jd and I disagree, but still right?
Originally posted by muzzleflash
It is called "EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY", and one of the original members of WikiLeaks, by the name of Young, has been explaining in depth why there is a good chance they are a front.
Many posters have come in and suggested that Young has a far better record with his leak conduit, cryptome, yet this has been ignored by the thread haters.
[edit on 7-4-2010 by muzzleflash]
Efforts by some domestic and foreign personnel and
organizations to discredit the Wikileaks.org Web site include allegations that it wittingly allows
the posting of uncorroborated information, serves as an instrument of propaganda, and is a front
organization of the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). See page four of the pdf.
(S//NF) Wikileaks.org represents a potential force protection, counterintelligence,
OPSEC, and INFOSEC threat to the US Army.
(S//NF) Recent unauthorized release of DoD sensitive and classified documents provide
FISS, foreign terrorist groups, insurgents, and other foreign adversaries with potentially
actionable information for targeting US forces.
(S//NF) The possibility that current employees or moles within DoD or elsewhere in the
US government are providing sensitive or classified information to Wikileaks.org cannot be ruled out. The claim made by Wikileaks.org that former US government employees
leaked sensitive and classified information is highly suspect, however, since
Wikileaks.org states that the anonymity of the whistleblowers or leakers is one of its
primary goals.
(U//FOUO) The Wikileaks.org Web site could be used to post fabricated information,
misinformation, disinformation, or propaganda and could be used in perception
management and influence operations to convey a positive or negative message to
specific target audiences that view or retrieve information from the Web site.
(U//FOUO) Several countries have blocked access to the Wikileaks.org Web site and
claim the right to investigate and prosecute Wikileaks.org members and whistleblowers
or to block access to or remove false, sensitive, or classified government information,
propaganda, or other malicious content from the Internet.
(U//FOUO) Wikileaks.org most likely has other DoD sensitive and classified information
in its possession and will continue to post the information to the Wikileaks.org Web site.
(U//FOUO) Web sites such as Wikileaks.org use trust as a center of gravity by protecting
the anonymity and identity of the insiders, leakers, or whistleblowers. The identification,
exposure, termination of employment, criminal prosecution, legal action against current
or former insiders, leakers, or whistleblowers could potentially damage or destroy this
center of gravity and deter others considering similar actions from using the
Wikileaks.org Web site.
Originally posted by angrymomma
I can totally see how this would be possible. What could be a better way to find whistleblowers in your own government agencies? Have you tried sending this info again from another computer, say at your local library? The crash may be coincidence, you never know. If it happens the second time, well, I'm on your side haha.
Originally posted by ladyinwaiting
Originally posted by angrymomma
I can totally see how this would be possible. What could be a better way to find whistleblowers in your own government agencies? Have you tried sending this info again from another computer, say at your local library? The crash may be coincidence, you never know. If it happens the second time, well, I'm on your side haha.
This is a great idea.
I don't think you are paranoid in the least. Our ability to think critically saves us sometimes.
Originally posted by TruthSeeker8300
no the government is not monitoring what you watch on your pc. Don't be so paranoid and controlled by fear. If any thing, being paranoid and fearful is what your enemies would want, and you're giving it to them! LOL
[edit on 7-4-2010 by TruthSeeker8300]