Robinesque Ruminations, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 31 times


reply posted on 6-4-2010 @ 07:49 PM by PuterMan
reply to post by PennyQ



Thanks Penny. Saved me getting to it. Glad I called in here first and saw your map.

Excellent.


reply posted on 6-4-2010 @ 07:56 PM by PuterMan
reply to post by Robin Marks



I was about to check on the drift when I got to this post.

Now you have my attention. Not that I was not interested before. but this makes me sit up.

Try this in Google but do NOT click on the link for IKKUMA which is the one you want.

Go to the cached version as the site has in my opinion been compromised.



This is the lady who also thinks Hudson's Bay is a caldera and it is very interesting reading.

[edit on 7/4/2010 by PuterMan]


reply posted on 7-4-2010 @ 10:39 PM by Robin Marks
reply to post by PuterMan



Were you going to make any maps? Or did you think PennyQ's map was sufficent?

She admitted heself that her version was a bit wonky. I was hoping with all your computer skills you could provide some mindblowing graphics.

I was going to write a bit more, but I'll cool my jets for a bit. You said you were sitting up, but I dont' know if you truly understand the mathematical impossiblity of the circles (the arcs) being random.

so


and I was going to write a bunch about the other Hudson Bay idea and the fact that PennyQ can see it, so why shouldn't everyone.

[edit on 7-4-2010 by Robin Marks]



reply posted on 8-4-2010 @ 03:47 AM by Nidwin
reply to post by Austria



www.water-technology.net...

upload.wikimedia.org...

A google earth picture off that entire region would be nice to see. Not only the lake but all around it. Probably a lot of circles to draw there too.


reply posted on 8-4-2010 @ 05:26 AM by PuterMan
reply to post by Robin Marks



Sorry Robin I have some work to do before I can get back to this. I will however when I have got this out of the way but I have to cool my heels for a day or two.

I hope you liked the IKKUMA article.

By the way there are lots of perfect patterns in nature, but not I will agree on such a grand scale perhaps.


reply posted on 9-4-2010 @ 08:44 AM by Robin Marks
reply to post by PuterMan



I agree completely. The universe is full of patterns. And everyone of them has a scientific explaination. Even if we haven't figured all the patterns yet. Even randomness has a scientific explaination and can be demonstrated mathematically.

I am not the only one to think that Hudson Bay is a crater. Many people have seen the perfect arc in the southeast of the bay. As a Canadian, I've stared at the giant hole in the Canadian Shield all my life. Long ago I decided it was probably formed by a asteroid impact. That's until I looked at it from my new perspective. Geologists thought it may be an impact crater as well. They performed a geological survey and found that it almost certainly was NOT from an impact due to the fact there was no rebounding found. Thier explaination for the arc is that it is purely chance. I coud except that one arc may be just a fluke. But my calculations show that there are three arcs and that when the arcs are extended into circles, they intersect perfectly and are linear. Examined with precise measurements and calculations, it will be shown that there is no randomness to the circles and arcs.

In Hudson Bay there is a magnetic anomoly. There is a perfect arc. There is a large body of water, a gaint hole in the middle of some of the hardest and oldest rock in the world, the Canadian Shield (which was formed by volcanoes. There is an anchient shoreline through Churchill Manitoba date back to 440 mya. Meaning it may not be recent formation due to the last ice age.

Want to be famous? Write a scientific paper on the mystery of the circles and scientists will be stratching their heads, and frothing at the mouth trying to figure it out. The geometery is the key. Then calculating the probablitlity.


reply posted on 9-4-2010 @ 09:59 PM by Anmarie96
reply to post by PuterMan



And just how long would these take to download here on the dreaded dial-up? would it freeze the computer? -- this is almost worse than trying the link and have it not work - - temptation - to try or not to try - Great thread the way - to go back in time to earlier formations of our ever changing earth



reply posted on 9-4-2010 @ 10:03 PM by PuterMan
reply to post by Anmarie96



Well it should not be too bad for the 590LoRes which is only 2MB

I suppose it depends how fast (or slow) your dial-up is!!


reply posted on 12-4-2010 @ 09:11 PM by Robin Marks
The following may be disjointed. I'm hoping to hold off a migraine, and before I take medication if there is a need, I want to write before I am unable. I couldn't write on the weekend because I was chasing around a seven year old by all by my lonesome. I barely had an hour to sit and catch my breath.

Firstly I must thank you Puterman for making your map. And thank you for making me a space to air my ideas, and save those that are still reading the Yellowstone thread from reading my longwinded ruminations. My favorite thing about your map is that you made the circles appear in the order in which the eruptions happened chronologically. The reason the circle in the southeast is virtually perfect is because it is the youngest. Trust me I sincerely appreciate your effort. And my criticism is only because I'm neurotic about these spheres. The most westerly circle is a tiny wee bit too big. The secret is that it runs through Churchill Manitoba. And it's Hudson Bay. You added and S. Don't feel bad. I refered to it as Hudsons Bay for decades. I think because we hear of The Hudon's Bay Company in history class. Yes, I liked the order in which the circles appear because it gives me sense of how it would look over time. Thank you again.

From the circles we get a direction of northwest movement. That's the diretion of the North American plate over the last 200 million years. That's why I didn't think Sheila Lynch-Benttinen's hypothesis is off the mark. She, like many others see the circles, or at least the perfect arc. She was looking for the missing pieces. There is no way parts of the event could be in Russia. The eastern edge of North America is about 200 million years away from the Mid-Atlantic Ridge when using the rate of movement of the plate. The spread is measurable and like with the rings in a tree, it can give you a time reference.

Seeing things. It would seem that lots of people have seen the perfect arc. Lots of geologists have studied it in an attempt to understand what caused the formation. Shelia Lynch-Benttinen saw the giant hole in Canada and wondered what caused it. PennyQ has done the excercise and now has circles running around in her brain. Puterman has sat up and taken notice. I saw the hole and I wanted to know how it was caused.

There have been other people who saw things on a map. Alfred Wegener saw things. He saw how the continents fit together like the pieces of a puzzle. He has been credited as the father of plate tetonics. His continental drift theory was born after he watch slabs of artic ice smashing into each other. I'll save you all the history, you can look him up and you'll notice that his ideas took a long time to take hold and he faced organized opposition. But he wasn't the only one to notice the puzzle-like appearance of the continents. "Magellan and other early explorers also noticed this on their maps." Wegener was wrong about the mechanism, but he was definately on the right track.

So what do I see? I won't ask Puterman to keep making maps. PennyQ seems eager so I will try and make her do some extra work. PennyQ, you have seen the three circles in alignment. But they are not the ony ones on the track. Manicougan Crater and the Gulf of St Lawerence have the center of their spheres in perfect alignment. You can make a perfect circle with the arc in the Gulf of St Lawernce. The center of that circle, and Manicougan make the line of circles, or craters, which are a chain of caldera.

I better stop writing. Migraine coming on. Won't edit. Hope it was coherant. Hope more people make more maps and maybe a math geek can work on that angle. Just hoping and thinking and soon my brain be aching.

Thanks all for your interest. And please infect other with the circles so that they may become obsessed and an answer found.

One last thing. Wegener came up with the idea of Pangea. As I've stated, North American has been moving northwest. The same direction as the circles in Hudson Bay. My hypothesis is that Pangea had been moving in a northwest direction over the hot spot that I believe is responsible for the caldera. During the extinction event some 200 mya, Pangea split apart. It was not long after my proposed Gulf of St Lawernce mega eruption. Not only was there a massive eruption at this time period, it was followed by the splitting of the super continent of Pangea.

Imagine a giant crack in the earth opening and then pushing the continent apart. Makes any event today seems like a hiccup.
I'm going. My head feels just like Pangea at the moment the pressure underneath reached a critical point.


reply posted on 13-4-2010 @ 03:33 PM by ressiv
reply to post by Anmarie96



yes eventuly america continent will split in 2 parts the madrid fault will open further from hudsonbay to the gulf of mexico...


reply posted on 16-4-2010 @ 01:41 PM by Robin Marks
I posted this on the Yellowstone thread, so if you already read it, just ignore it. But I decided to post here because it is important and relevant considering the events in Icleand. I am not predicting a major eruption under the ice sheet, but it very well may happen.


www.nytimes.com...

This statement in the article jumped out for me, "“Certainly the fact that the eruption is going on underneath the ice sheet is likely to have an effect on the explosivity of the volcano,” Dr. Macpherson said.

He likened the situation to putting a hot pan under the kitchen faucet — as the hot magma hits the cold water it rapidly creates steam. If the steam is contained by rock, the pressure can build up and a localized explosion can occur."

Newton said that the same forces that occur on earth, occur in the heavens as well.

The geologist in the article illustrated a eruption scenario using a cooking anology. It was a cooking mistake which led to the developement of my mega-eruption hypothesis. Except my simulation uses hot oil and water.

This type of steam explostion is called a Phreatic eruption.

en.wikipedia.org...

Note that Krakatoa is believed to have been caused when sea-water breached the magma chamber. On a small scale, the geysers of Yellowstone work in a similar fashion.

Fire and ice. Here's my simulation which I believe is more dynamic that the frying pan example in the article.

www.youtube.com...


reply posted on 16-4-2010 @ 02:36 PM by ressiv
reply to post by Robin Marks



you agree looking at yhe NY times pic that the crater is staring at us??? :-)

btw imagine wat effect water will have on the maasili vulcano (3K high and 500 mtr under water near Italy )..

the flanks of the mountain could collapse any moment they are very weak... and an full load of magma in his chamber....

we could say.. europe is under volcanic fire right now...
certainly now they predicted that there is an 75% chance that in iceland the katla volcano will erupt too... as I read it somewere in an pinatuba style... VEI 5 ore 6........

[edit on 16-4-2010 by ressiv]

[edit on 16-4-2010 by ressiv]


reply posted on 19-4-2010 @ 05:02 PM by Robin Marks
I don't want to post too many sites with stuff about the volcano in Iceland on the Yellowstone thread so I'll post lots of links here. I was really hoping to have more people post their maps with the circles here. I tried. That's all I can do.

www.pbs.org...

www.guardian.co.uk...

www.telegraph.co.uk...

www.csmonitor.com...(photo)/4

www.csmonitor.com...

thelede.blogs.nytimes.com...

lens.blogs.nytimes.com...

www.universetoday.com...

news.ninemsn.com.au...

www.timesonline.co.uk...

news.discovery.com...

www.google.com...

thelede.blogs.nytimes.com...

news.discovery.com...

www.huffingtonpost.com...

www.huffingtonpost.com...

www.youtube.com...

www.huffingtonpost.com...

www.youtube.com...

I'm obsessed with volcanoes. That's because I discovered something new and I am compelled to share that knowledge. It's all about fire and ice. And the volcano in Iceland is demonstrating this dynamic. Watch my simulation on You Tube and see it in action. It's explosive.

I believe we just went through a lunar cycle over the last two years which has driven a magma cycle causing the swarms under Yellowstone and the eruptions of Redoubt in Alaska last year and the current eruption in Iceland. There is a very good chance that a second volcano is a serious threat and is larger and more explosive.

Fire and ice, fire and ice.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



An unusual tree called Jaboticaba
  Posted 7 days ago with 77 member flags
Haunting pics of abandoned cities around the world
  Posted 2 days ago with 63 member flags
Strange Sounds (UK) published on youtube on 5/13/2012
  Posted 15 days ago with 53 member flags
Pole Shift Data You Shouldn\'t Ignore
  Posted 12 days ago with 46 member flags
Indian state says it\'s OK now to kill tiger poachers on sight
  Posted 4 days ago with 41 member flags