It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


HIV/AIDS Conspiracy

page: 2
<< 1   >>

log in


posted on Jan, 4 2005 @ 02:47 PM
Now why would the DoD and W.H.O. be disussing about a virus that sounds strangely similar to AIDS before the outbreak?

The World Health Organisation in published articles, called for scientists to work with these deadly agents and attempt to make a hybrid virus that would be deadly to humans. In the bulletin of the World Health Organisation WHO), Volume 47, p.259, 1972, they said, "An attempt should be made to see if viruses can in fact exert selective effects on immune function. The possibility should be looked into that the immune response to the vims itself may be impaired if the infecting virus damages, more or less selectively, the cell responding to the virus."

W.H.O. Murdered Africa


There are two things about the biological agent field I would like to mention. One is the possibility of technological surprise. Molecular biology is a field that is advancing very rapidly and eminent biologists believe that within a period of 5 to 10 years it would be possible to produce a synthetic biological agent, an agent that does not naturally exist and for which no natural immunity could have been acquired.

MR. SIKES. Are we doing any work in that field?

DR. MACARTHUR. We are not.

MR. SIKES. Why not? Lack of money or lack of interest?

DR. MACARTHUR. Certainly not lack of interest.

Funding was approved in 1970 - $10 million to the DOD.

AIDS: The Man Made Plague

Also worth watching is the Strecker Memorandum. (realplayer file)

Soon after these discussions we had the AIDS outbreak. Concidence?

We have produced far more deadlier weapons such as military-grade anthrax, sarin gas, mustard gas and even nuclear warheads. Is it really far-fetched to think that these people also made AIDS? Dr. Strecker not only shows this is possible, but even details the possible method used to create the virus. There are many prominent scientists and even nobel prize winners that are advocating this theory. There certainly seems to be some merit to this conspiracy?

posted on Jan, 4 2005 @ 04:15 PM
ive kinda always thought AIDS was man made

the theory has been floating around for a very very long time

plus the govt never ever tells us about their Biological weapons expierments
they only brag about their neat chemical weapons

but they never ever talk about their neat biological weapons
plus the mere existance of the secret biological weapons facilitys and the massive amount of $$$ they spend and their level of technology

im sure they have cures for ALL known human diseases
id wager every penny i have on that...

posted on Jan, 5 2005 @ 12:23 PM
I was reading somewhere (sorry, don't have the source handy) that HIV is harmless, and that the AIDS treatment is what actually causes full-blown AIDS.

Have HIV? Get treated.

I find it odd that the virus always seems to mutate enough times to where it's virtually unstoppable.

posted on Sep, 8 2012 @ 01:57 PM
The AIDS denialists and revisionists do seem to have many good logical arguments that HIV does not cause AIDS. However, none of their books and documentaries addresses one simple question: What about the people with AIDS who do not use AZT yet die anyway?

They say that no one dies from AIDS, and that they die from malnutrition (as in Africa) or from using the toxic drug AZT that was prescribed to them, right? If that's so, then all those Americans who died from AIDS, could have survived by just not taking AZT right? If so, then what about those who died from AIDS yet took no AZT at all, such as Christine Maggiore?

How do they explain them? The AIDS revisionist documentaries seem to ignore this point and do not seem to address it.

Also, where are the studies that show that most people diagnosed with AIDS and do not take AZT end up living normal lives?

Furthermore, if the HIV test is unreliable, then why doesn't someone who is HIV positive just test again to get a negative result and then consider themselves not infected?

new topics

top topics
<< 1   >>

log in