It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Chief Hayden

page: 8
2
<< 5  6  7   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 14 2010 @ 10:00 AM
link   

Originally posted by gavron
You might want to check your sources again. :


My sources are very good and very clear and verified.

Its you that have no sources to debate me.



[edit on 14-4-2010 by REMISNE]



posted on Apr, 14 2010 @ 10:02 AM
link   

Originally posted by REMISNE

Its you that have no sources to debate me.


I use a source on ATS that stated the following:



2. Chief hayden was still getting his men out of the safety zone area and trying to keep water going to the engines when the call was made, so he probably did not know what the fire commander decided to do.



posted on Apr, 14 2010 @ 11:40 AM
link   

Originally posted by gavron
[2. Chief hayden was still getting his men out of the safety zone area and trying to keep water going to the engines when the call was made, so he probably did not know what the fire commander decided to do.


Still can not understand the difference between building and area.

Also that is not a source jsut an opinion from me.



posted on Apr, 14 2010 @ 11:44 AM
link   

Originally posted by REMISNE
Also that is not a source jsut an opinion from me.



Then perhaps you should check this source:

www.jod911.com...

Your source....that you provided.

Assertion 7.



posted on Apr, 14 2010 @ 11:46 AM
link   

Originally posted by gavron
Your source....that you provided.

Assertion 7.


What does that source have to do with what we are discussing about Chief Nigro?



posted on Apr, 14 2010 @ 11:50 AM
link   

Originally posted by REMISNE
What does that source have to do with what we are discussing about Chief Nigro?



It directly refutes any references to "pulling" meaning the building. It proves that "pulling" means the men/crew from the area. Larry's statement does not specifically state the building....he later clarified it was referring to pulling the men from the area.



posted on Apr, 14 2010 @ 11:52 AM
link   

Originally posted by gavron
It directly refutes any references to "pulling" meaning the building. It proves that "pulling" means the men/crew from the area. Larry's statement does not specifically state the building....he later clarified it was referring to pulling the men from the area.


How many times do i have to keep asking before i get a adult reponse.

Where in the link does to state about firemen in the building during the call?



[edit on 14-4-2010 by REMISNE]



posted on Apr, 14 2010 @ 11:54 AM
link   

Originally posted by REMISNE
Where in the link does to state about firemen in the building during the call?



If you are too stubborn to review a link that is provided, there is no help for you. How can you debate someone when the other person doesnt even bother to follow links that answer their questions?

If you want an answer to your question, at least have the courtesy to follow the link that provides that answer.



posted on Apr, 14 2010 @ 11:57 AM
link   

Originally posted by gavron
If you are too stubborn to review a link that is provided, there is no help for you..


Thanks for showing again you cannot post what i ask for.



new topics

top topics



 
2
<< 5  6  7   >>

log in

join