It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Is it at all relevant to compare 9/11 to the incident at the Empire State Building in 1945? A B-25 ran into it accidentally, took out about 14 office workers, but only damaged one floor. Obviously it was a much smaller airplane with a lot less fuel, but it seems interesting that it only left a fairly big hole but nothing more.
At 9:49 a.m., the ten-ton, B-25 bomber smashed into the north side of the Empire State Building. The majority of the plane hit the 79th floor, creating a hole in the building eighteen feet wide and twenty feet high. The plane's high-octane fuel exploded, hurtling flames down the side of the building and inside through hallways and stairwells all the way down to the 75th floor.
One of the engines and part of the landing gear hurtled across the 79th floor, through wall partitions and two fire walls, and out the south wall's windows to fall onto a twelve-story building across 33rd Street. The other engine flew into an elevator shaft and landed on an elevator car. The car began to plummet, slowed somewhat by emergency safety devices. Miraculously, when help arrived at the remains of the elevator car in the basement, the two women inside the car were still alive.
Originally posted by thedman
B25 was travelling at 1/3 the speed of the 767's which hit towers, it also
weighted less than 1/10 that of 767
Fuel load on plane was only small fraction of 767 and back in 1945 was lot less fuel load to ignite and burn (no plastic/synthethics)
Comparing apples to oranges ....
Originally posted by hooper
Pull it refers to the firefighting team.
Originally posted by REMISNE
Originally posted by hooper
Pull it refers to the firefighting team.
Maybe you can answer the question i have been asking for years and you and others keep refusing to answer.
How can PULL IT refer to the firefighting team when they wre already out of the building as testified to by Chief Nigro and Chief Hayden?
Chief Nigro stated he evacuated the firefighters BEFORE talking to the owner. Which means BEFORE talking to Siverstein.
Originally posted by REMISNE
No, because only the fire commander would have called him to tell him what was going on. Do you have training in emergency incident command, becasue i do?
Do you have a source that Silverstien lied about talking to the fire commander?
Do you have a source that chief Nigro lied about evacuating the firemen before talking to the owner?
Originally posted by hooper
You better talk to BoneZ because I thought Nigro didn't talk to the owner. You also repeated that contention. Now you are saying he did talk to him, and not only are you saying Nigro talked to Silverstein you are also advising us of the timeline.
Originally posted by REMISNE
1. Chief Nigro stated that he evacuated the firemen BEFORE talking to the owner Silverstein.
2. By the time the call was made to Silverstein Chief Nigro was the fire commander.
3. Silverstein stated that the fire commander (Nigro) decided to PULL IT, which could ony mean the building since the firemen were already out of the building.
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
Yeah, I do. Loads of it.
I think that what occurred during what was, let's face it, quite a busy day for all concerned, along with its psychological impact, may have affected some people's recollection of the exact order of events.
You think that some outlandish plan involving the senior officers of the NYFD and shadowy demolition teams was executed and then covered up for no reason.
I'm just employing common sense, really.
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
For example, Nigro could have begun to pull the men out of the building, then called Silverstein.
Call me mental, but I find this more likely than your not-secret-then-secret demo teams.
Originally posted by REMISNE
What law enforcement schools have you been to?
But that is why you have an emergency incident command to keep control of things.
No i am stating the facts, i never stated their was a plan involving the senior officers.
probably discussed it with other experts or superiorers in the incident command group
I am stating the fact the fire commander has the autority to bring down a building in an emergency and their were demo teams on site.
Originally posted by REMISNE
Do you think Chief Nigro would have left his men, if he thought they were in a dangeruos situation to call Sivlerstein?
What was secret about the demo teams? We have facts and evindence that there were demo teams on site by 3PM.
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
I did a correspondence course from the University of Cornwall.
Who, according to your own source, were not able always to keep to the protocols.
Which sounds an awful lot like you do think senior officers were involved.
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
You think:
that several senior FDNY officers decided to demolish a burning building. Thus decided, and despite the danger, they sent a demo team into an inferno to perform a previously unheard of "demolition", the details of which remain utterly obscure. They then kept this fact secret for NO REASON. And no one from the demo team has come forward.
Originally posted by REMISNE
So what is wrong with having demo teams do a unheard of job?
Originally posted by Joey Canoli
Maybe cuz it would be ridiculously unsafe?
Originally posted by REMISNE
Well lets look at the facts again.
1. There were no raging fires by that time.
2. There were no fires on the lower floors as comnfirmed by the fact the EPA had recovered a majority of the fuel in the tanks.
Originally posted by gavron
No raging fires....no fires on lower levels. If the fires weren't raging, then why the fear that they would jump to other buildings?
Originally posted by REMISNE
Gee. you do understand that fire is still fire?