It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by schrodingers dog
reply to post by the end and the what
You two should do a hypothetical podcast debate as if you were competing for office.
I'd have suggested JPZ to join ya but he's not into "editing" if you know what I mean ... not saying he rambles endlessly and would take him half the podcast to preface one thought, just saying.
But you two should do it.
Originally posted by whatukno
reply to post by Jean Paul Zodeaux
Except the problem being is End is running for POTUS and I am running for a seat in the House of Representatives, and have no real desire for the white house. It is my opinion that no sane individual would want the position of POTUS.
While I have no problem with individuals being able to spend as much money as they wish to promote or denounce a candidate. I do have a problem with corporations doing so.
The ruling is akin to allowing corporations to lobby the people directly and influence an election. I cannot agree that corporations have such a right under the Constitution. I have to say that the people individually do have such a right. But not the entity of the corporation as a whole.
The business of the federal government is mainly to the people that it represents. It should do everything it can to provide an environment where a business can prosper, but I don't think that business has any business influencing the people.
# A Fair Tax will be the only allowed form of tax to be implemented EVER. A use tax, per se, something that is applied for all purchases. Their will not and cannot be a luxury or sin type tax to be installed. It will only be allowed to be across the board rates. Allowance for removal of products is a possibility, like food, clothing or possibly rental of basic living quarters. All transactions other than this need to be enforced, including such items as the transfer of stocks and the like. What I am getting at here is a consumption tax. Something that cannot be avoided by the ELITE of our country. The more you spend, the more you pay. I suggest the removal of the food and such for the benefit of the poorer of us. Their purchases are more in line with their sustenance.
# All yearly property taxes will be eliminated. When you purchase your item, you own it! The government is not allowed to continually tax you forever on something. See Fair Tax proposal. This is in regards to the Allodial Title. This is not a State issue, any detriment to completely owning property hence having to pay future taxes on said property, is a detriment to our rights of ownership. Allodium Title-"land which is absolute property of the owner, real estate held in absolute independence, without being subject to any rent, service, or acknowledgement to a superior. It is thus opposed to feud." No more illegal use of Eminent Domain to take private land, if the land is needed for the use of the government that is allowed, no more better tax base bull.
The U.S. "tax army" is bigger than the U.S. army in Iraq. Income taxes are so complex that there are up to 1.2 million paid tax preparers in the country -- six times more than the number of troops in Iraq. The tax army includes legions of accountants, lawyers, and computer experts -- some of the best minds in the country. Unfortunately, their brainpower is adding little to the nation's standard of living.
I wonder, would it be a violation of the constitution to require legislators to wear corporate logos of companies that are directly sponsoring them? After all, it would show the American people who these people are really listening to.
Originally posted by whatukno
reply to post by Jean Paul Zodeaux
Should I do like other candidates and tell you what I think you want to hear instead of how I really feel?
Originally posted by Jean Paul Zodeaux
Originally posted by whatukno
reply to post by Jean Paul Zodeaux
Should I do like other candidates and tell you what I think you want to hear instead of how I really feel?
Are you serious? I mean I'm pretty sure your just being clever, but come on! I realize the matter of taxation is a difficult one, and not a very entertaining, but it is the central issue to all governments for without it government can't run. Taxation is necessary but income taxation is not. I offer the first 90 years of our country's history as evidence. If you are an advocate for income taxation then say so. If you are, it would certainly be easier to just say so, than attempt the very difficult issue of finding a better solution as End is trying to do.
Originally posted by Subjective Truth
Originally posted by Jean Paul Zodeaux
Originally posted by whatukno
reply to post by Jean Paul Zodeaux
Should I do like other candidates and tell you what I think you want to hear instead of how I really feel?
Are you serious? I mean I'm pretty sure your just being clever, but come on! I realize the matter of taxation is a difficult one, and not a very entertaining, but it is the central issue to all governments for without it government can't run. Taxation is necessary but income taxation is not. I offer the first 90 years of our country's history as evidence. If you are an advocate for income taxation then say so. If you are, it would certainly be easier to just say so, than attempt the very difficult issue of finding a better solution as End is trying to do.
You are right about taxation but it has to come with representation and it seems that the more time goes on the more this is overlooked. But we do need roads and schools and infrastructure. And the thought of not paying any taxes is in a way unpatriotic.
What we need is a fair and balanced approach for our government. We need to stop the wars and stop the foreign aid and also any bailouts. The things we need are so easy it boggles my mind why they dont do it. It is like they want it to fail or something. I would hate to think they are that incompetent. But it is either incompetence or planned there is little gray area here.
Originally posted by whatukno
Taxes are going to be a part of your life as long as you are alive. There is no real way around it.
But, in order to lower taxes, (which is what everyone wants to hear) you have to reduce spending. Which the government has to do. Of course, you still will have to pay taxes. But it will be a less amount because there would be less things for the government to have to spend it on.
Originally posted by whatukno
Taxes are going to be a part of your life as long as you are alive. There is no real way around it.
But, in order to lower taxes, (which is what everyone wants to hear) you have to reduce spending. Which the government has to do. Of course, you still will have to pay taxes. But it will be a less amount because there would be less things for the government to have to spend it on.