It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
United States Code Title 26 Subtitle F Chapter 7701 Cornell University Law
(a) When used in this title, where not otherwise distinctly expressed or manifestly
incompatible with the intent thereof—
.....The term “person” shall be construed to mean and include an individual, a .....trust, estate, partnership, association, company or corporation.
(a)When used in this title, where not otherwise distinctly expressed or
manifestly incompatible with the intent thereof—
.....(30) United States person
.....The term “United States person” means—
..........(A) a citizen or resident of the United States,
..........(B) a domestic partnership,
..........(C) a domestic corporation,
..........(D) any estate (other than a foreign estate, within the meaning of paragraph ..........(31)), and
...............(E) any trust if—
....................(i) a court within the United States is able to exercise primary ....................supervision over the administration of the trust, and
....................(ii) one or more United States persons have the authority to control all ....................substantial decisions of the trust.
Originally posted by SonicInfinity
A person only has "unalienable rights" when either you enforce it yourself or have others enforce it for each other. For instance, I have a right to say that I dislike this thread. Do you wish to enforce your right to say my opinion is flawed and to leave if I don't agree with you? Yes, but then I can enforce my "right" to stick around in this thread and troll you. What would happen in this situation? Moderators would come in this thread and give me the proper warnings. Now, what would happen if the moderators decided to troll along with me? Where would your "rights" be then? Would you try to enforce them, or would you leave ATS and go elsewhere? What if you couldn't go elsewhere, and ATS was the only place you could go?
The point I'm trying to make is that it's all fine and dandy to live in a fantasy world believing that you are entitled to certain unalienable rights, but unless you and people around you are willing to enforce them, you have jack squat. Luckily, lots of countries around the world enforce these rights; however, unless they are enforced, they don't exist. Instead of whining about how you are having labels put upon you, you should instead enjoy the rights you do have that you and others around you help keep alive. Complaining on an Internet forum will do nothing to give you more rights, unless you are looking for comfort.
Constitutor. [Latin "an orderer, arranger."] Roman Law. A person who, by agreement, becomes responsible for the payment of another's debt.
Originally posted by seasoul
I am a sovereign “citizen of eternity.”
My soul is a hologram of the “Creator.”
To infringe on the freewill or personal truth of a “citizen of eternity,” is to violate a fundamental “law of the universe.”
Do self-serving laws manufactured by a corrupt government supersede the eternal laws of creation?
I don’t think so.