It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

New Evidence Emerges On Obama's Background!!!

page: 8
109
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 5 2010 @ 10:44 PM
link   
I think ATS has been infiltrated by primarily left-wing astro-turfers. I've read a lot of comments by a lot of people in many different forums, and all the people defending Obama all sound the same on all of them. The same ad-hominem attacks, the same sources of information to try to backup their position. Everything scripted and sounds the same all across the internet.

Major problems with Group-Think going on. The funny part about all of this is that there are no other independent sources of information to backup their claims beyond those few sites they quote. Outside of that it all ends at a brick wall trying to find out anything else about him. I mean seriously just venture to other forums and read the comments of the defenders of Obama and then read the defenders of Obama here.

There is nothing verifiable about Obama's past outside of the organizations that he chose to release the info too. Absolutely nothing, if you don't believe me go look for yourself, make sure you search far and wide too. The man is a fraud, a liar, and so much more. The most important info that is not accessible is his college records. All sealed and not available for public consumption. So all the defenders of Obama if you seriously want to challenge the claims levied against him, then find info from independent sources.

Obama is about to be busted, there is noway to keep what ever it is he is hiding now under-wraps, the righties and independents smell blood in the water and even though a few White-House press corps want to make millions off of unprecedented access to Obama to make millions in book sales, there are journalist that want to make millions in book sales and achieve superstar status by exposing him.




posted on Apr, 5 2010 @ 10:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by skunknuts





Best,
Skunknuts


Only because it needs to be seen again




posted on Apr, 5 2010 @ 10:46 PM
link   
reply to post by antideceit
 


Another person banned due to inability to follow civil discourse.

Hopefully his ban will clue people in to disagree...angrily if you must, but remain civil.



posted on Apr, 5 2010 @ 10:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by Light of Night
I think ATS has been infiltrated by primarily left-wing astro-turfers.


Actually it's quite the opposite. How many Obama threads do you see on the front page all the time? Plenty. How many threads that bash the right wingers? I haven't seen many..or one in a while ...



It seems if you agree with Obama on the slightest thing, you get torn apart. You can't have a thread supporting the HC bill without it being hijacked by Obama haters. It's unsettling but it's their right to express their opinions.

So no, the site hasn't been taken over by left wingers. In fact, I don't think there is enough political diversity here, just my 2 cents



posted on Apr, 5 2010 @ 10:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by Light of Night
I think ATS has been infiltrated by primarily left-wing astro-turfers. I've read a lot of comments by a lot of people in many different forums, and all the people defending Obama all sound the same on all of them. The same ad-hominem attacks, the same sources of information to try to backup their position. Everything scripted and sounds the same all across the internet.

Major problems with Group-Think going on. The funny part about all of this is that there are no other independent sources of information to backup their claims beyond those few sites they quote. Outside of that it all ends at a brick wall trying to find out anything else about him. I mean seriously just venture to other forums and read the comments of the defenders of Obama and then read the defenders of Obama here.

There is nothing verifiable about Obama's past outside of the organizations that he chose to release the info too. Absolutely nothing, if you don't believe me go look for yourself, make sure you search far and wide too. The man is a fraud, a liar, and so much more. The most important info that is not accessible is his college records. All sealed and not available for public consumption. So all the defenders of Obama if you seriously want to challenge the claims levied against him, then find info from independent sources.

Obama is about to be busted, there is noway to keep what ever it is he is hiding now under-wraps, the righties and independents smell blood in the water and even though a few White-House press corps want to make millions off of unprecedented access to Obama to make millions in book sales, there are journalist that want to make millions in book sales and achieve superstar status by exposing him.


Says the person who registered within the week


If you knew ATS at all, and had the ability to be an unbiased observer, you would see that the situation is tilted towards the opposite of what you purport to have analyzed.

Perhaps things are a bit more balanced now that HCR has passed, and there are fewer people on the health insurance corporations payroll.

Furthermore, the teabag movement is the definition of astroturf. Dick Army and freedom works for god's sake! GOP signs with their names taped over. Palin, the leader, was the GOP VP candidate LAST CYCLE!

What you are seeing is the natural backlash to the teabag movement showing its true colors and consistently being unable to back-up its claims in reality. The fact that many teabaggers are welfare princes that can afford to gallivant all over the country thanks to government handouts is just the icing on their flimsy hypocritical cake.

They peaked too soon, and this November is going to be quite a letdown (in a similar fashion to the passing of healthcare reform, despite their boastful guarantee that the legislation was dead).

Best,
Skunknuts

[edit on 4/5/2010 by skunknuts]



posted on Apr, 5 2010 @ 10:56 PM
link   
reply to post by GorehoundLarry
 



Actually it's quite the opposite. How many Obama threads do you see on the front page all the time? Plenty. How many threads that bash the right wingers? I haven't seen many..or one in a while ...


When Bush was president there were many front page stories about the right. Just because the left is in power doesn't mean that the site leans right, this site leans towards a distrust of government all together.

 


On topic though, what I find interesting is that what many members have said about the CIA actually running the show may actually turn out to be true. Deeper investigation is needed and I'm sure it is currently in progress. This is to big of a story to not investigate further. Somebody wants to be a star and makes millions off of book sales for generations for exposing the biggest fraud in history.



posted on Apr, 5 2010 @ 10:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by CalibratedZeus


A few weeks later the law school got a phone call from the Board of Trustees telling them to find him an office, put him on the payroll, and give him a class to teach. The Board told him he didn't have to be a member of the faculty, but they needed to give him a temporary position. He was never a professor and was hardly an adjunct.




BREAKING DEVELOPMENT--just as these disturbing facts come to light about Barack Obama, the White House is busy making deals with numerous 'journalists,' promising unprecedented access to the President in exchange for refraining from reporting certain information 'they may discover.'


I am really interested now. If true, i would especially like to know who, exactly, is pulling the strings.


Are you serious?

George Soros.


George Soros, the man behind the curtain (and Obama) will have his way come Hell or high-water.


pumasunleashed.wordpress.com...

Soros and his financial world order are running the show.








posted on Apr, 5 2010 @ 11:07 PM
link   
I don't remember seeing this posted so I will go ahead and post this link here.

Communication Corruption at the White House

Pretty interesting with links to other organizations and their views about what is going on with this current situation.

 


Also to the person who tried the ad-hom on my with my registration date, just because I recently registered doesn't have anything to do with the amount of time I have been visiting the site.



posted on Apr, 5 2010 @ 11:07 PM
link   
reply to post by Light of Night
 


oh trust me, I remember the threads about Bush but really, we had a reason to be against the SOB.

However, all the claims against Obama are kind of....silly....understandable, but silly.

Bush actually went out of his way to infringe on our freedoms with the Patriot Act and having protesters at the Republican convention arrested.

[edit on 5-4-2010 by GorehoundLarry]



posted on Apr, 5 2010 @ 11:16 PM
link   
So far off topic its ridiculous. The bar application is reviewed by the bar committee (no?) Therefore, any discrepancy would be addressed by them. Surrendering one's law license for a "frivolous" complaint seems to show poor judgment, wouldn't you say?

On a side note: I really enjoy these topics because it exposes the left for what it really is: a group of small-minded and hateful people who will try and destroy anyone who disagrees with them. When you have to resort to name calling (racist, bigot, etc) to advance your position, maybe you should rethink your position.

SM88



posted on Apr, 5 2010 @ 11:17 PM
link   
reply to post by GorehoundLarry
 


Stay on topic, Bush is no longer president, Obama is. Deal with it. Obama has extended the Patriot Act, has spent even more reckless amounts of money, passed the Unconstitutional health care bill, through questionable legal means. Just because you

"Think"

you want what he as passed doesn't make it legal, or even less damaging than the Patriot Act.

Now that is the last I will address of this, stay on topic. This Thread is about Obama and his past that nobody seems to be able to verify. If you would care to take up my challenge and actually find independent sources about his past other than from the usual suspects then be my guest.



posted on Apr, 5 2010 @ 11:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by Light of Night
reply to post by GorehoundLarry
 


Stay on topic, Bush is no longer president, Obama is. Deal with it. Obama has extended the Patriot Act, has spent even more reckless amounts of money, passed the Unconstitutional health care bill, through questionable legal means. Just because you

"Think"

you want what he as passed doesn't make it legal, or even less damaging than the Patriot Act.

Now that is the last I will address of this, stay on topic. This Thread is about Obama and his past that nobody seems to be able to verify. If you would care to take up my challenge and actually find independent sources about his past other than from the usual suspects then be my guest.


BRAVO Sir!!!!



posted on Apr, 5 2010 @ 11:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by Light of Night
reply to post by GorehoundLarry
 


is no longer president, Obama is. Deal with it.


No need to say that to Gorehoundlarry. That is exactly what people like you need to do, deal with the fact Obama is now president. Throwing around false information and continuing to whine about his eligibility after the elections last year is pathetic and people like you and others need to deal with it.

And when people reference Bush as a comparison its a fair comparison. When folks keep their mouths shut during the 8years of Bush and only decided to conveniently pop up here to complain when Obama is voted in, there is verymuch reason for comparison.



posted on Apr, 5 2010 @ 11:25 PM
link   
When the facts showed up, this "evidence" folded faster than Superman on laundry day.



Good job OP.

Lets hope more read this.

Unexpectedly Flagged,

- Lee



posted on Apr, 5 2010 @ 11:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by skoalman88

Originally posted by Light of Night
reply to post by GorehoundLarry
 


Stay on topic, Bush is no longer president, Obama is. Deal with it. Obama has extended the Patriot Act, has spent even more reckless amounts of money, passed the Unconstitutional health care bill, through questionable legal means. Just because you

"Think"

you want what he as passed doesn't make it legal, or even less damaging than the Patriot Act.

Now that is the last I will address of this, stay on topic. This Thread is about Obama and his past that nobody seems to be able to verify. If you would care to take up my challenge and actually find independent sources about his past other than from the usual suspects then be my guest.


BRAVO Sir!!!!







posted on Apr, 5 2010 @ 11:33 PM
link   
reply to post by Southern Guardian
 


Take a look in the mirror, I never questioned his nationality, ad-hom attack from you. I am dealing with it by trying to find out more about the man that is our president, I don't suffer from blind allegiance, Obama doesn't know me from Adam as I don't him and I'm trying to find out who this man is.

So please take up the challenge, find verifiable information from independent sources about his background. You can't you know why? Because I have already tried to find out. The only "facts" are what Obama and the DNC and whoever funded him want you to think.

Deal with the fact that you have nothing to support your case other than Obama and Co. approved sources. There is a huge smoke plume and the firefighters are on their way to find out where the fire is at. So deal with the dissent and the fact that Obama is about to be exposed for the fraud that he is.



posted on Apr, 5 2010 @ 11:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by Light of Night
reply to post by GorehoundLarry
 


Stay on topic, Bush is no longer president, Obama is. Deal with it. Obama has extended the Patriot Act, has spent even more reckless amounts of money, passed the Unconstitutional health care bill, through questionable legal means. Just because you

"Think"

you want what he as passed doesn't make it legal, or even less damaging than the Patriot Act.

Now that is the last I will address of this, stay on topic. This Thread is about Obama and his past that nobody seems to be able to verify. If you would care to take up my challenge and actually find independent sources about his past other than from the usual suspects then be my guest.


Actually, it really is about Bush as well. Considering he DESTROYED this country's image to the world and the county's economy. Who has to fix it? Our new president.

You're right, Obama is commander in chief now. I am dealing with it, are you?






Originally posted by skoalman88

On a side note: I really enjoy these topics because it exposes the left for what it really is: a group of small-minded and hateful people who will try and destroy anyone who disagrees with them. When you have to resort to name calling (racist, bigot, etc) to advance your position, maybe you should rethink your position.

SM88


Really? So calling Obama names or making up rumors about him is the right way to go? Damn never knew. This country loves scandals and this proves it.

I love these topics too, as it exposes the Right and how it shows they will destroy the president in any way imaginable.



posted on Apr, 5 2010 @ 11:41 PM
link   
reply to post by skunknuts
 


i dont normally comment on stuff like this and i cant stand obama but i found your cartoon hilarious. especially when he speaks of the quantum regan state.



posted on Apr, 5 2010 @ 11:51 PM
link   
don't listen to republicans...seriously

cdn.theladders.net...

it says LECTURER, lol.

a reason why it wasn't sourced to a resume.

i've looked at this many times, it always said the same thing.



posted on Apr, 5 2010 @ 11:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by Light of Night
I never questioned his nationality,


Eligibility does not necessarily have to be about nationality. It can be about job experiences, it can be about associations, and this is all the OP and others seem to argue against Obama over. You did question his eligibility for the presidency:


This Thread is about Obama and his past that nobody seems to be able to verify.


You questioned the fact that nobody could verify his experiences he listed for the job as president that has just as much to do with eligibility to you as it does to a birther over where Obama was born. So dont try to run away from the comment you just made.


I am dealing with it by trying to find out more about the man that is our president,


Because apparently the election year of 2008 was not enough for you. Your trying to find out more about the president because your not convinced about his position as president. I dont think your dealing with it at all like the rest here.


find verifiable information from independent sources about his background.


Oh like official verification that he was born in Hawaii?
hawaii.gov...

Or the fact Spokesperson from the Hawaiian health department, Janice Okubo, confirmed his current birth certificate shown is valid:


"It's a valid Hawaii state birth certificate," spokesman Janice Okubo told us.

www.politifact.com...

Don't believe she actually said that? Look at the statement and her phone number will be inside it:

hawaii.gov...

Or the verification from the University of Chicago lawschool that he was a professor there?

www.law.uchicago.edu...

How about the constitution itself that leaves eligibility up to Congress and the Electoral college to deal with?
topics.law.cornell.edu...

Do you want his kindergarten records as well? I bet he didnt eat good ol' american pie when he young right? That should be an important issue we should know about our president!

Theres information out there, you just refuse to look at them. What you want is more on this man so that you can complain further. Thats what people like you are looking for.


Because I have already tried to find out.


Going onto rightwing websites complaining about Obama sealing his information is not 'trying' in my opinion and I'd bet my bottom dollar this is all you've been doing.


Deal with the fact that you have nothing to support your case other than Obama and Co. approved sources.


Like the University of Chicago Lawschool themselves?
www.law.uchicago.edu...

like politifact?
www.politifact.com...

Please explain to me here how these sources are biased. Enlighten me please, because merely dismissing them does not explain a thing to me. I can tell you a tonne of things about the examiner, or WND, or those blogs Kozmo referenced. You go first.


that Obama is about to be exposed for the fraud that he is.


Is 'going' 'will' 'is' 'might' 'maybe'.

People like you have been talking since the elections and let me tell ya, it hasnt changed a damn thing. I actually recall a member saying the exact same thing as you in October of 2008. Your all sounding like broken records to me.



new topics

top topics



 
109
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join