It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

New Evidence Emerges On Obama's Background!!!

page: 15
109
<< 12  13  14    16  17  18 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 6 2010 @ 03:04 PM
link   
I thought that this is an accidental hoax post?

edit to add.....nothing.

[edit on 6-4-2010 by smurfy]




posted on Apr, 6 2010 @ 03:07 PM
link   
reply to post by Angus123
 


Why, the trial would be in Birth Certificate Court of course!
Don't you know nuthin'?



posted on Apr, 6 2010 @ 03:13 PM
link   
Good...finally moved to where it belongs.

I almost think there needs to be a new section for things like this...it isn't really a HOAX...it is plain DIS INFO.

Maybe there should be a new DIS INFO section created...and those threads that qualify get moved there with a heavy penalty slapped on the OP.


A HOAX is one thing...someone may post it asking "Have you seen this video...is it real?" and it turns out to be a hoax and is moved to HOAX.

What we have here (and HERE) are obvious propaganda and dis-information...used to confuse and spread lies. The OPs could have easily researched it and found it to be already debunked by many other sources...but instead, in their IGNORANCE (deny ignorance) they come on to this fine website where we are supposed to speak truth and post this as FACTS.

To me...it is worse than a HOAX...it is a blatant lie and dis-info.



posted on Apr, 6 2010 @ 03:35 PM
link   
What a surprise! A Hoax!
And how about all you coo coo whacky ATS'ers that HEAPED stars and flags on this BS!
I suggest that maybe, just maybe, ( going way out on a limb here), some of you need to develop some critical thinking skills! Just sayin'!
To fall for such blatant propaganda SHOULD be embarrassing. you might want to stop being knee jerk suckers for baloney!
And to the OP, well...............


[edit on 6-4-2010 by OldDragger]



posted on Apr, 6 2010 @ 04:58 PM
link   
The only HOAX is the one that Obama pulled on the nation to get elected. Over promise and under deliver should have been his campaign theme.

Just had to get on more lick in
Regardless if the info cited in the OP is a hoax or not. Obama still has a foggy past. It all just does not add up. Some his personal accounts in his memoir have been contradicted multiple times by Obama and his wife. Including two different stories about how they met and how they paid off their student loans ??


Good times
See you in the bread lines ....



posted on Apr, 6 2010 @ 05:22 PM
link   
These diversions seem to be a daily thing now. All to keep us at each others throats to our own detriment.

There are some facts that can be stated categorically however. Both Parties lie. Both Parties use their supporters to carry the lies.

To me it seems to be that the whole idea is to keep us from realizing that we don't actually need any Political Parties to begin with. We would be far better off if each candidate ran on their own merits. The argument of how do you raise funds without a Party system is so much nonsense. A system could easily be contrived to remove money from the process entirely.



posted on Apr, 6 2010 @ 05:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by maybereal11

Originally posted by K J Gunderson
How is it that this thread has gotten to 14 pages already and not one of you birther types has asked yet to see "The Blogging Professor's" credentials? How do we know this blogger is a professor and not just a senior blogger?


See my posts above...its complete BS


I knew it was BS, you knew it was BS, and many others knew it was BS. I just could not help but find the deep deep irony so very entertaining that people were debating whether or not Obama deserved the title of "professor" based on something someone that refers to them-self as "professor." How much funnier can these people get?



posted on Apr, 6 2010 @ 05:58 PM
link   
reply to post by jibeho
 


OMG !!! I almost fell out of my chair when I looked at those photos!

So if this is posible does anyone know if his Mom knew Malcom x ?



posted on Apr, 6 2010 @ 06:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by debunky
... and here you can read the anonymous bar complaint.

factsfirstok.blogspot.com...

The short of it:
In his book he admits to have taken some illegal substances. (Dont know if true, haven't read it)
So Mr complainant, having read the bar application form, notices that it asks if you have ever been convicted for use or possession of drugs, and if said convictions exceed 200$.

Mr Complainant of course knows, that thats not what the illinois bar meant with that question, they really wanted to ask if he ever did drugs. "HE LIED!"



Can you explain that, please. If they specifically ask about a conviction and not use, then how did he lie? He was not convicted of possession yet he admitted to use. What was the lie?



posted on Apr, 6 2010 @ 06:08 PM
link   
reply to post by jibeho
 


The only HOAX is the one that Obama pulled on the nation to get elected. Over promise and under deliver should have been his campaign theme.

Just had to get on more lick in Regardless if the info cited in the OP is a hoax or not. Obama still has a foggy past. It all just does not add up

Well there you go!
Brilliant reasoning there.
It doesn't matter if the info IS ALL BS! It doesn't add up!
Doeasn't matter if all the crap about Obama is a complete lie, all you know is you don't like him and he's guilty of something!

Learn to think guys!

[edit on 6-4-2010 by OldDragger]



posted on Apr, 6 2010 @ 06:15 PM
link   
But most of the mouth-breathing, domino pizza eating, pabst slamming, Idol watching dolts of America don't have enough brain horsepower to throw behind this and figure it out!

Quoted from the OP in another thread.
Hmmmmmm.
Naw....it's too easy!



posted on Apr, 6 2010 @ 06:16 PM
link   
Well, I'm almost sorry this thread has ended up where it belongs: it'll die now & it was entertaining. Its almost as if the OP had begun with
"Bring me your angry, your brainless, your poor debaters..."
What worries me is that British politics is predicted to get personal in the American style also. We're doomed!



posted on Apr, 6 2010 @ 06:36 PM
link   
reply to post by Socristotle
 

Really man is that the best you have to offer? Pitiful!



posted on Apr, 6 2010 @ 06:54 PM
link   
reply to post by K J Gunderson
 

You didn't know. He also played with the DODGERS for several seasons!



posted on Apr, 6 2010 @ 06:58 PM
link   
reply to post by K J Gunderson
 

It must not matter because for 14 pages all you Obama fans have cried and cried it doesn't!




posted on Apr, 6 2010 @ 07:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by OldDragger
reply to post by jibeho
 


The only HOAX is the one that Obama pulled on the nation to get elected. Over promise and under deliver should have been his campaign theme.

Just had to get on more lick in Regardless if the info cited in the OP is a hoax or not. Obama still has a foggy past. It all just does not add up

Well there you go!
Brilliant reasoning there.
It doesn't matter if the info IS ALL BS! It doesn't add up!
Doeasn't matter if all the crap about Obama is a complete lie, all you know is you don't like him and he's guilty of something!

Learn to think guys!

[edit on 6-4-2010 by OldDragger]


All I know is that I actually read his book and have followed his presidency. There are many aspects of his life that don't make sense. I believe he was either born in HI or WA and not in Kenya. That is my belief. The book reads like a Lifetime network drama movie. It is very well created if you like that sort of thing. Funny the book is titled after a father who he never really knew.

Furthermore, how does one really know if all of the information about Obama is a lie or not? All verifiable information has been swept clean. Naturally, one can only speculate based on personal time lines and based on personal accounts from those who were acquainted with the man through the years.

Even his own accounts contradict themselves. It walks like a duck....



posted on Apr, 6 2010 @ 07:30 PM
link   
To this very day Obama still claims he is a constitutional lawyer. He states such in interviews. If the supreme court of Illinois says he has no authority to practice law he can't be a constitutional lawyer.
This was stated in the posted article. So this part was not a hoax.
www.iardc.org...



posted on Apr, 6 2010 @ 07:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by rick1
reply to post by K J Gunderson
 

It must not matter because for 14 pages all you Obama fans have cried and cried it doesn't!



So I pointed out the complete stupidity that was this thread and your retort is to proudly proclaim that yes indeed, stupidity is more important than facts? OKEY DOKEY!



posted on Apr, 6 2010 @ 08:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by dontbelievehype
I'm interested in seeing the way in which the pro Obama posters mostly assert back at posters they say are reproducing assertions and lies.

No - I'm not a Republican/Democrat. Yes - I'm a moderate libertarian as those of you who check out my replies to threads that say you can just walk into a court of law and be above its jurisdiction etc will see.

Do I like Obama? No because he's just another Tricky Dicky except in a different way but that's a fact of life for politicians in top positions. Lying is a way of life in the political sphere.

But some of you Obama defenders sound like pieces of work who believe that your political beliefs justify the weird concealment of our President's past.

All over this board some of you push and push like cheap crack the notion that anybody who wants to go digging into Obama's fairly murky past in some ways is a 'nut'. Yep that's what happens when ordinary citizens want to know more or know more than what the powers that be tolerate.

Much as I like Kennedy, his security did the same thing with all the women he slept with. Women were warned that if they said anything publicly or privately about their romps with the Prez, they would find themselves locked away in loony bins.

Those surrounding those in power will ruthlessly attempt to stifle and kill any facts that bring up realities that don't reflect well on or could unseat their boss.

So - I agree that some of the anti Obama material is lacking in substance. Some of it is half baked stuff like the whole Professor 'controversy'. But since you Obama supporters are parading around a "Certification of Birth' please answer these questions.

I am just another thinking person who is not convinced that a man like Obama with his aliases, Indonesian documents stating he is a Muslim, British subject father, adopted by mother's Indonesian husband etc etc makes a legitimate native born President or somebody who has integrity.

Certification of Birth: Go to the Obama Timeline by Don Fredrick on the net. He is a conservative anti socialist but not a 'nut' - his extensive piece (which is available in book form I think) rakes up some interesting information.

According to him, Obama's half Indonesian sister also has a Certification of Birth as do other people despite the fact she was nowhere near Hawaii when she was born. For whatever reason as he says (probably population boosting stats for taxation purpose) Hawaii issued such certificates, including to Chinese leader Sun Yat Sen.

BUT this is not the original birth certificate. It is a document that says the birth was registered in Hawaii.

There's too much interesting stuff in his article to comment on and reproduce here - I'll save that for later.

But one of the reasons why I think this guy is on to something is the facts he finds out like the one about Frank Marshall Davis. Obama knew him. Marxist Davis, friends with Obama's grandfather had links with radical figures like the Weatherman who served prison time.

Yet the Obama camp and their friends in the media responded with righteous indignation pre election to suggestions that he knew this radical except that the ex prisoner sat at the same table at some function.

Clearly there is so much dilution of truth going on. Obama's trails haven't gone cold because some people like Fredrick have done their research. Obama has tried to cover up his Marxism, he has sealed his probably mediocre academic records but there's so many other question marks.

When he finishes office it will all be aired out. Too late.

As for Bush supposedly getting a pass - horsemanure. Remember Fortunate Son? Will anybody be able to get a similar expose of Obama published?

Democrats/the Left/other Liberals did nothing but villify him for his two terms and the media lent a lot of their support to it.

So to the Obamers - what can you counter with apart from smearing everybody else as 'nuts' and 'liars?

[edit on 6-4-2010

[edit on 6-4-2010 by dontbelievehype]


+1



posted on Apr, 6 2010 @ 08:45 PM
link   
Well I am interested to find that this is in the "Paul Bunion???" forum

I think the OP should have filed this incredibly frightening information in a
P O L I T I C A L forum, a place where we talk about politics, not lumberjacks.

Anyhow OP awesome, between people like you and FOX news, well I AM VERY WELL
informed.



I wonder what libtards will say to this one?


the savior isn't so saviorish now is he is?



new topics

top topics



 
109
<< 12  13  14    16  17  18 >>

log in

join