I am totally into Caesar's Messiah.
Ia m very much interested to see Christians trying to disprove this theory.
It is so solid.

I would be very interested in discussing this book. First, I have to state that I still haven't fully completed it yet, though I've read a substantial portion of it.

Some of his facts were a bit of a stretch, but one section I found particularly compelling. This was his explanation of the empty tomb. I was aware that the NT gospels do not agree on the details of the empty tomb. Some say there was 1 angel, some say 2, some the other disciples were notified and in some they were not. I always thought this was very curious that they did not agree since this is one of the most critical stories of the bible, Jesus' resurrection. But this book was the first to point out that each gospel empty tomb story has a time stamp. One says the women came before dawn, one says early in the morning, and so on. This was the first time I had ever heard this and it turns out to be true! And if you put the empty tomb stories together according to their timestamps, they do tell a different story! It seems very unlikely that each story would specifically mention a time (or time stamp) if there wasn't a specific reason for it.

I found this to be absolutely incredible! It does appear to show the hand of "somebody," whether you believe it to be Flavious Romans or not, writing something into the gospels that has nothing to do with Jesus.

This was the first explanation I have ever heard about why the gospels do not agree on the empty tomb story. I am amazed that more people (religious scholars and such) aren't talking about this.

What did you (or anyone else) think of that section?