Guy Who Predicted Large EQ Event in CA Now Saying Lookout Alaska

page: 1
10
<<   2 >>

log in

join

posted on Apr, 5 2010 @ 12:40 PM
link   
The guy who predicted a large event in CA 10-15 hours before the 7.2 Baja quake using his special brand of geomagnetic and sunspot science is now saying he fears a large event will likely happen in Alaska during his watch period of April 4-12:



I guess only time will tell, but I have opened up GEE monitoring of many stations in Alaska.




posted on Apr, 5 2010 @ 12:48 PM
link   
Uh, the quake was in Mexico, not California,
Close, but no cigar.



posted on Apr, 5 2010 @ 12:48 PM
link   
a lot of us here have been talking about the potential of this happening, seems like the quakes are moving north up the pacific rim.

7.0's and such are no big deal up here, after the 64 quake things have been built to withstand quakes.


I'm hoping its nothing to big, i wouldn't mind a nice 2minute 7.5.

we dont have roller coasters or amusement parks up here, it would be fun


edited to add: its been about 6years since our last 7.5 and it only lasted about 30seconds.

had birds at the time (super annoying birds
) and they went nuts about 10seconds before the quake, its amazing how animals can detect that kind of thing.




[edit on 4/5/2010 by Alaskan Man]



posted on Apr, 5 2010 @ 12:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by OldDragger



Uh, the quake was in Mexico, not California,
Close, but no cigar.


Still felt though there.

But i doubt this geezer.



posted on Apr, 5 2010 @ 12:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by OldDragger

Uh, the quake was in Mexico, not California,
Close, but no cigar.


Well to be fair It was in Baja California, Mexico

So it was in California, just not the one we was all thinking of.


[edit on 5-4-2010 by Rising Against]



posted on Apr, 5 2010 @ 01:06 PM
link   
reply to post by Alaskan Man
 




I see you're the adventurous type.

Well, hopefully it won't be anything like this:

geology.com...

Or this:
en.wikipedia.org...

Or this:





posted on Apr, 5 2010 @ 01:08 PM
link   
Is there any proof this guy predicted an Earthquake in California? Does his prediction have a reliable time stamp.

When it comes to predicting Earthquakes in California, one must keep in mind small Earthquakes happen in California every day. If I predicted an Earthquake to occur in California on July 4, my ability to predict earthquakes will not be validated if there are a couple small tremors somewhere in California on July 4 because small tremors happen everyday.



posted on Apr, 5 2010 @ 01:11 PM
link   
reply to post by TrueAmerican
 


haha, I'd like to think I'm adventurous.

that huge wave was actually caused by a massive landslide/ice-slide.

and the 64 one was nuts, i wasn't born yet, but my father lived threw it and it didn't sound fun at all.

I really hope its nothing like the 64, it doesn't matter how well built infrastructure is when its 9+ on the rector scale buildings, roads and bridges are gonna fail.



posted on Apr, 6 2010 @ 06:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by Alaskan Man

I really hope its nothing like the 64, it doesn't matter how well built infrastructure is when its 9+ on the rector scale buildings, roads and bridges are gonna fail.




yeah hope it's not like that either. My mom, dad and I think most of my siblings lived through it too. It's just too weird how pretty much everywhere has been hit by earthquakes but here so I think it's about due.



posted on Apr, 6 2010 @ 06:34 PM
link   
reply to post by OldDragger
 


The quake that happened in Mexico effected all of Southern California. That is because it was on the boarder.



posted on Apr, 7 2010 @ 05:24 AM
link   
Well, a 5.1 did just hit Alaska, Aleutian Islands.

earthquake.usgs.gov...

Nothing that's going to bother Alaska Man though.


Still, we need to keep an eye on this guy's research!



posted on Apr, 7 2010 @ 11:28 AM
link   
Just had a bit of a shaker a few minutes ago. Wasn't too big though I'm guessing a 3 or less. Actually looking at the map it was a 4.7 but 27 miles from Anchorage.

[edit on 7-4-2010 by sandman441]



posted on Apr, 7 2010 @ 11:48 AM
link   
Yes, and another looks like it is incoming now. Maybe this guy is right.

So far a 4.7:

earthquake.usgs.gov...

and another, not posted yet- I see it in GEE.

[edit on Wed Apr 7th 2010 by TrueAmerican]



posted on Apr, 7 2010 @ 11:52 AM
link   

Originally posted by Rising Against

Originally posted by OldDragger

Uh, the quake was in Mexico, not California,
Close, but no cigar.


Well to be fair It was in Baja California, Mexico

So it was in California, just not the one we was all thinking of.


[edit on 5-4-2010 by Rising Against]


CA is an abbreviation for THE California though. Not for Baja Cali, Mexico. To be fair I just wanted to state that because it is obvious why people are getting confused with the thread title as is...



posted on Apr, 7 2010 @ 12:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by TrueAmerican
Yes, and another looks like it is incoming now. Maybe this guy is right.

So far a 4.7:

earthquake.usgs.gov...

and another, not posted yet- I see it in GEE.

[edit on Wed Apr 7th 2010 by TrueAmerican]



hmm weird, I didn't feel those two just the first one. I kinda like this site a bit better. www.aeic.alaska.edu...



posted on Apr, 7 2010 @ 12:17 PM
link   
reply to post by sandman441
 


It may have been below a 2.5, in which case you would not have felt it and the USGS wouldn't report it here:

earthquake.usgs.gov...

As to that other site, I don't like it as much, because they aren't posting at least an estimated magnitude right away, like the USGS does. But thanks for the link.
I'll bookmark it, just in case.



posted on Apr, 7 2010 @ 12:19 PM
link   
lol, no sooner I said that and the second one which I saw in GEE came up at your link... Mag: 1.15- that's why you didn't feel it.



posted on Apr, 7 2010 @ 05:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by TrueAmerican
lol, no sooner I said that and the second one which I saw in GEE came up at your link... Mag: 1.15- that's why you didn't feel it.


haha, I think either one is ok I doubt there is any real difference between the two. It actually wouldn't surprise me if the map they use is the same one from the usgs site.



posted on Apr, 7 2010 @ 05:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by TrueAmerican
lol, no sooner I said that and the second one which I saw in GEE came up at your link... Mag: 1.15- that's why you didn't feel it.


haha, I think either one is ok I doubt there is any real difference between the two. It actually wouldn't surprise me if the map they use is the same one from the usgs site.



posted on Apr, 7 2010 @ 05:10 PM
link   
hmm double post

[edit on 7-4-2010 by sandman441]





top topics
 
10
<<   2 >>

log in

join