It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
And you think I'm the one being juvenile.
Welcome to my ignore list.
I don't know where you are in UK but next clear night you get, locate Mars then look about thirty to fourty degrees in all directions from the red planet
Originally posted by misteRee
Originally posted by Damian-007
I woudn't blame someone if they had a logical theory (i.e. raw data, mathematics and using the scientifc method) and it turned out to be false - I really wouldn't be bothered and i'd applaud at least for the time and effort.
But get ready for 0:01am January 1st 2013, these people are going to be held accountable for their false prophecies, mis-information and fear-mongering.
Originally posted by john124 reply to post by Wide-EyesI'm sorry, but it's doubtful you would be able to accurately determine that an object viewed from the ground is in space. Have you at least taken length exposured photos to show its path across the sky over several hours? A red light visible for a short amount of time and then suddenly disappearing without doing anything spectacular is most likely a lantern. Lanterns are so common, and not all are the same, that you can't really discount them in these circumstances.
No, the two red objects are in space. I know a lantern when I see one.
A new extrasolar planet has been discovered using a new technique that will allow astronomers to detect planets no other current method can. Planets around other stars have been previously detected only by the effect they have on their parent star, limiting the observations to large, Jupiter-like planets and those in very tight orbits. The new method uses the patterns created in the dust surrounding a star to discern the presence of a planet that could be as small as Earth or in an orbit so wide that it would take hundreds of years to observe its effect on its star.
Originally posted by Xcalibur254
reply to post by Yummy Freelunch
However, Sitchin and his followers claim that Nibiru is bigger than Jupiter. So, not only would it be easier to detect than an asteroid, it should also be easier to detect than any other planet in the solar system, yet astronomers, professional and amateur, have failed to find anything of the sort.
Originally posted by Xcalibur254
reply to post by Zeus2573
This topic is posted under the 2012 board so clearly the creator of the thread felt that Nibiru is related to 2012. Therefore, somebody did make a link between Nibiru and 2012 long before the post you replied to was made.