You have not been posting facts. You have been posting hoaxes.
Watch the video, Lucas has researched them, this is research and he likes to speculate just as we all do, but he stuck with the provable, documented
facts for all of his evidence, and the very unsuual timeline of events the leaders have been up to. This is very clear, very well documented.
Are you going to say something substantial or are you going to continue to be a cheerleader shouting slogans?
Have you checked any of the information posted in these ludicrous videos?
1. Have you checked any of the dates to see if they match known dates?
2. Have you looked to see what is the interpretation of the petroglyphs?
Obviously, the speaker is collecting so-called facts from other sources. He is putting his spin onto research from other people and falsifying
information to create his own delusion. That's no different than Hapgood who was mentioned earlier in this thread.
The video posted called biggest star appears to be a rip off of another video which provided information in a non-MTV airhead mode. The original video
of which these are stills described the orders of magnitude difference between known celestial objects.
Of course none of this says anything about a new planet in our solar system. It is simply irrelevant spam posted here to trash the thread.
Please restrict your postings to relevant information.
1) NO EVIDENCE FOR NIBURU CONFIRMED BY ANY SCIENTIST, USING AN UNDERSTANDABLE THEORY OR LOGIC TO ANALYSE DATA IN ORDER TO COME TO A CONCLUSION
2) YOU'RE WASTING YOUR TIME DISCUSSING UNTIL SOME CREDIBLE DATA COMES ABOUT.
3) AM I WRONG TO SAY A SPACE MONKEY EXISTS? EVEN THOUGH PEOPLE SAY NIBIRU EXISTS? SHOULD I MAKE YOU PROVE ME WRONG EVEN THOUGH ITS UNFALSIFIABLE? I.E
WE HAVE NO DATA OR EVIDENCE TO SAY IT DOES OR DOESN'T EXIST, I MEAN...NOT EVEN PROBABILITY FROM WHICH TO WORK FROM?
At least you can use probability to say life could exist elsewhere, but Niburu is just as credible as cosmic feta cheese.
Originally posted by ET_MAN
I wonder why some people spend so much of their time following a thread that they do not agree with or believe in?
I can't for the life of me understand why you feel that this is in any way wrong. Would it suite you more to just post you 'Facts and Evidence'
without any one member questioning it? I'm sure it would, but thankfully there are those who don't just sit by. It's less about someone directly
opposing you and your opinion, but rather providing an opposing, rational viewpoint in a thread that would otherwise by devoid of such. I.e: It's for
the readers, members and non-members to have two sides to look at, hopefully they choose the more rational and evidence based one.
I actually spent some time going over some of the links you posted. The information is riddled with fallacies (some already pointed out by others) and
misconceptions. How can any theory built of it be taken seriously if the basic information is lacking any validity?
If perhaps the above is Scientifically proven as facts then how many other possibilities exist out there that could happen beyond your current level
of understanding of the physical seemingly material world/existence you currently occupy/live in?
Does it not open up a doorway to many other possibilities that perhaps do not fit your current understanding-preconceived beliefs/ideas on what matter
is and what the physical world really is?
What is possible?
How does one define possible?
What is not possible and how does one know for sure?
Perhaps it's "TIME" for someone to think just a little beyond the box.
What is "TIME" ?
What is "SPACE"?
How does one know for sure?
Are you confident that nothing can be beyond "TIME" and "SPACE"?
How do you know for sure that an unseen brown dwarf does not exist beyond your "TIME" "SPACE" -dimension?
Is that a possibility and is it also possible that it could just show up and materialize within your "TIME" "SPACE" - dimension?
Afterall have you considered yet the many possibilities based on Scientific proven facts accepted in Science today from the above video?
Do you accept Scientific facts proven to be real?
What is REAL for you?
How do you personally define REAL?
What makes you so certain that you are always right and know it all for sure?
ET_Man you posted a link with a list of dates in the 80s having to do with a search for planet-x. You do realize that the conclusion of that search
was that the measurements were in error. Better measurements were taken that showed large measurement error in the original data.
I'm just posting this to fill up space. It will appear at the top of a new page and we can start all over again. It's obvious why some people post
huge irrelevant pictures and links-- to bury their detractors.
You have heard of quantum mechanics, but obviously don't understand it. It is useful only for very small scale interactions. Planets are best
described using classical Newtonian physics. For a brown dwarf to be orbiting around a point just outside the Oort cloud, there would have to be some
mass there the keep it in orbit. This mass would then interact with the rest of the solar system. The story you posted in support is an obvious fraud,
yet still you defend it. The obvious conclusion is that you are a fraud, which means you are deliberately lying. I pity the fools who take you
I believe in Nibiru because of this: (I know people will call me crazy for this)
But ever since I was little, I've had a dream that haunted me. It was a third person view like I was standing on the moon. In this view, I could
see an extremely large red/brown body face to face with the earth.
When I came across planet x and nibiru, something clicked in my head and has lead me to read up on it ever since.
It's a personal feeling and I understand no one will understand it. But I know that it's lurking nearby.
Perhaps, they have built an antigravity field so their effects aren't noticed upon other bodies.
The Above Top Secret Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.
All content copyright 2014, The Above Network, LLC.