It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Tayesin
Originally posted by stereologist
To claim that a planet made of shiny gold, therefore a high albedo, can be in the solar system without anyone noticing is well a bit on the unbelievable.
Sitchin never claimed Nibiru was made of shiny gold, he claimed the Anunnaki suspended it in their atmosphere. In which case it would appear sparkly once it reflects light from our sun.
This is one of the things my old mentor fought with Sitchin about, his "addition" to justify the need to mine gold on earth. From my understanding there is nothing saying the Anunnaki suspended gold in their atmosphere for any reason.
Just an after-thought...
Funny how we humans have toyed with suspending aluminium in our atmosphere for various 'reasons'.
Originally posted by stereologist
Tayesin and patmac, the problem is that the evidence is rather lacking or made up such as the claims of Sitchin's arrest and trial.
I'm not supporting Sitchin here, in fact I oppose some of his claims, and I do so based on my mentors work.
Originally posted by stereologist
Don't forget that the planets Neptune and Uranus were found because they were predicted to exist and found close to their predicted positions. The predictions were based on the observations of the movements of the known planets in the solar system. Yet, here you'd like us to believe that here is an object that has an unstable orbit and large mass that orbits in a stable manner and has no noticeable effect on the other planets and cannot be seen although much smaller objects with less albedo are tracked.
All the planets in our system were described in the Sumerian Texts, including their sizes/masses, order, and appearance up-close long before our infant sciences "discovered" them.
And, I'm not asking you to "believe" anything. In fact, I'm very interested to learn more about what science thinks is the cause of much of the perturbations that are being recorded... and that may also align with the record of growing severity of natural events on our little rock.
I still take a wait and see attitude on Nibiru while I go about my daily tasks. I simply cannot discard the entire story as garbage or myth because of the excellent information that I do know from my mentors work with the British Museum an dhaving read their report on the reassembled bones as described quickly in my above post.
[edit on 5-4-2010 by Tayesin]
Originally posted by stereologist
The other problem with the planet is that it would reveal its existence two ways at least. One is to modify the path of other planets. That is not observed. Two is that the object would be easily detected by telescopes.
Originally posted by patmac
Also, I remember there being a few articles from the mid 80's when they launched the hubble.
Originally posted by DelMarvel
Originally posted by patmac
Also, I remember there being a few articles from the mid 80's when they launched the hubble.
The Hubble was launched in 1990, I think.
You're talking about the IRAS from 1983 which was an infrared satellite. There were some sensationalized mainstream reports (the Washington Post gets cited frequently) at the time talking about some unidentified sources that might have been within the solar system. However they all turned out to be be distant galaxies and/or infrared cirrus.
The Planet X supporters continue to cite the original 1983 articles and ignore all the subsequent research, talking instead of a cover up.
Originally posted by patmac
So I guess that just leaves the cave wall paintings. Whats your take on that?
Originally posted by lambs to lions
reply to post by v3_exceed
You must be joking. There are dozens of text in several languages documenting the account of Jesus. Some of them hundreds of pages. There is an often mis-translated little fragment of information from one ancient culture which mentions niburu. Other than that, just a bunch of elementary school quality videos on youtube. The two aren't comparable. Until someone, somewhere comes up with atleast a small shred of something. A photograph, or a few seconds of footage, anything! Then i would consider being more open-minded and entertain the idea, and even invest some time in my own research. Until then, it's a joke.
Originally posted by Archirvion
Nasa posted on their website about finding the planet for 6 months ago?
Originally posted by NotAgain
Don't fear though, I have seen the destruction of 2011-2013 in Remote Viewing and it was a time of unity.
[edit on 6-4-2010 by NotAgain]