It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
- Baryonic Matter: ~5% of the mass in the universe
This is ordinary matter composed of protons, neutrons, and electrons. It comprises gas, dust, stars, planets, people, etc.
- Cold Dark Matter: ~25%
This is the so-called "missing mass" of the universe. It comprises the dark matter halos that surround galaxies and galaxy clusters, and aids in the formation of structure in the universe. The dark matter is said to be "cold" because it is nonrelativistic (slow-moving) during the era of structure formation. Dark matter is currently believed to be composed of some kind of new elementary particle, usually referred to as a weakly interacting massive particle (WIMP).
- Dark Energy: ~70%
Through observations of distant supernovae, two research groups have independently discovered that the expansion of the universe appears to be getting faster with time. This seems to require some kind of "antigravity" effect which we do not understand. Cosmologists believe that the acceleration may be caused by some kind of new energy field that permeates the universe, perhaps even the cosmological constant that Einstein imagined almost a century ago. Whatever the source of this phenomenon turns out to be, cosmologists refer to it generically as dark energy.
Originally posted by AceWombat04
I've asked several people with physics and astrophysics backgrounds this question, and all they can say is: We literally don't know yet, nor do we have a way of knowing.
In other words: If there was NO matter, no particles, no energy, etc. ANYWHERE in space, even at very great distances, would space still remain a medium, somehow tangible and dynamic in and of itself?
In physics, a virtual particle is a particle that exists for a limited time and space, introducing uncertainty in their energy and momentum due to the uncertainty principle. Because energy and momentum in quantum mechanics are time and space derivative operators, then due to Fourier transforms their spans are inversely proportional to time duration and position spans, respectively.
Originally posted by davidgrouchy
Even though
no one has isolated
a single hydrogen atom
in a vacuum tube
Originally posted by constantwonder
In reality however we have no way to describe "emptyness" or nothing it's beyond our ability to understand because we don't experience it or have a way to create it. .
I think, though, that virtual particles, vacuum energy, and the zero point field are probably omnipresent so to imagine otherwise is somewhat trivial.
in interstellar space, there is the 2.7 K background blackbody radiation left over from the Big Bang. This heat permeates every physical body in the Universe.
Originally posted by davidgrouchy
Even though
no one has isolated
a single hydrogen atom
in a vacuum tube
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Are you sure about that?
A proton's charge-mass ratio may be measured by allowing a proton of known velocity to enter a magnetic field and then measuring the angle of deflection. Hence, using the known value for the charge of a proton the mass may be calculated. You can do the same thing for an electron.
The reason I know this is, that was my science project in high school physics and I used a vacuum tube.
"According to those promulgating the various speculative hypotheses and models regarding the nature of spacetime and the quantized field permeating the known universe, is hypothetical empty space a medium or dynamic field in and of itself (even hypothetically absent any matter "occupying" it,) or is the dynamic field created and sustained by the very existence of matter itself in the first place, however far apart it may be at stellar distances?"
(preferably that someone with no mathematic, algebraic, or technical skill can comprehend.)
Originally posted by AceWombat04
Do you mean that because whatever the force responsible for gravitation is must be capable of being exerted on any and all matter, all matter has to "know" where all matter will be, is, and/or was?
Originally posted by davidgrouchy
And you have
how much time on
the particle accelerator
in Pittsburgh from back in the day?
Originally posted by AceWombat04
"According to those promulgating the various speculative hypotheses and models regarding the nature of spacetime and the quantized field permeating the known universe, is hypothetical empty space a medium or dynamic field in and of itself (even hypothetically absent any matter "occupying" it,) or is the dynamic field created and sustained by the very existence of matter itself in the first place, however far apart it may be at stellar distances?"
In other words, I understand and accept that we cannot know what the case may be literally and definitively at this time, but what do humanity's most brilliant minds hypothesize regarding these questions?