It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by predator0187
reply to post by MPad556
That's what I thought but they have untouched exif's or whatever.
I am not sure if they are fake or whatever, this subject just intrigued me and thought I would share it with the good people of ATS and see what I can get from here.
Pred...
Color Mode 3
Create Date 2007:05:14 08:47:36+01:00
Creator Tool Adobe Photoshop CS2 Windows
Date/Time Digitized 2010:02:27 10:10:19Z
Date/Time Original 2010:02:27 10:10:51Z
Color Mode 3
Create Date 2007:05:14 09:18:05+01:00
Creator Tool Adobe Photoshop CS2 Windows
Date/Time Digitized 2010:02:27 10:10:51Z
Date/Time Original 2010:02:27 10:10:19Z
Originally posted by predator0187
reply to post by mckyle
Hey, I don't think anyone here was like 'look proof of aliens.' And as the person that brought it here I just wanted to see what other people thought of the subject as well. A discussion is a discussion, no need to insult people.
Pred...
Originally posted by internos
Thanks for sharing: yes, they have untouched EXIF... but the one posted by UCB are a little bit incomplete:
EXIF data show the Photoshop CS2 tag, both as creator tool and software used, and it's also interesting that between create date and digitized date there are almost three years of difference
Image # 1
Color Mode 3
Create Date 2007:05:14 08:47:36+01:00
Creator Tool Adobe Photoshop CS2 Windows
Date/Time Digitized 2010:02:27 10:10:19Z
Date/Time Original 2010:02:27 10:10:51Z
Image # 2
Color Mode 3
Create Date 2007:05:14 09:18:05+01:00
Creator Tool Adobe Photoshop CS2 Windows
Date/Time Digitized 2010:02:27 10:10:51Z
Date/Time Original 2010:02:27 10:10:19Z
The REAL photos were taken three years ago, and someone seems to have tried to manipulate the "original date/time" tak with some exif tool.
Plus, photoshop.
You decide
Originally posted by mckyle
My apologies mate,
I wasn't directing my previous comments at you. I'm more than happy that you brought this to our attention, as I always am with any poster.
So my apologies for coming across as a stab at you - it wasn't.
Whether material is good or bad, it's always of benefit to bring it out into the open and discuss it. That way we all get to learn how to tell a bad one from a potentially good one.
S&F'd.
Originally posted by predator0187
I just think for how fake this looks it almost makes it more amusing.
Pred...
我国对于不明飞行物的研究,从1947年6月24日美国的阿罗德发现不明飞行物开始。尽管对于UFO的研究已经过去� ��60年,但是仍然处于“初级阶段”,原因主要还是UFO实在是太难得一见。
This is sort of off topic I suppose but, how hard would it be to fake the exfil data? Anybody know?