It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Evidence 7.2 Baja Cali quake was Haarp

page: 2
11
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 4 2010 @ 10:44 PM
link   
so someone please explain why HARP causes earthquakes? HARP is effecting the air, what is all this about it causing earthquakes? I know it can cause storms and what not. One theory about HARP is that it caused the earthquake in Haiti.... HARP is run by the military, so why in the world would we cause an earthquake with it and then send our military to clean up and spend money that we don't have. Why would we do this to our own country putting us in more debt?? And if we knew that HARP caused earthquakes I am sure we would stop messing with it...




posted on Apr, 4 2010 @ 10:45 PM
link   
By chance, has anyone reported seeing a 'rainbow' or
something similar (odd sky colors) just before the quake ?
.



posted on Apr, 4 2010 @ 10:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by Pillar
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Look here Physical 'evidence'......stop the rude comments and start acting mature guys

[edit on 4-4-2010 by Pillar]


Yes, good thing to point out. This is indeed much more solid than pure numerology...



posted on Apr, 4 2010 @ 10:57 PM
link   
numbers always make some sense, no coincidence, only signs...
here might be a relevant event: www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Apr, 4 2010 @ 11:05 PM
link   
HAARP killed my father, and raped mother....

but in all seriousness I find it hard to believe the HAARP/earthquake connection. I understand that there is the possibility that the government and operators of this technology could be hiding its true abilities and purpose from us, but given all the brilliant minds in our own community (not just ATS), I have yet to see one qualified individual come up with any way that HAARP would be capable of creating earthquakes...and they have tried. just my .02



posted on Apr, 4 2010 @ 11:18 PM
link   
reply to post by Shark VA84
 


what the ham fat is this? have you seen jesse ventura conspiracy theory

www.youtube.com...


haarp has the capability to make a quake.

uhh just can't get good help ats these days.



[edit on 4-4-2010 by Pillar]

[edit on 4-4-2010 by Pillar]



posted on Apr, 4 2010 @ 11:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by Pillar
reply to post by Shark VA84
 


what the ham fat is this? have you seen jesse ventura conspiracy theory

www.youtube.com...


haarp has the capability to make a quake.

uhh just can't get good help ats these days.



[edit on 4-4-2010 by Pillar]

[edit on 4-4-2010 by Pillar]

Please tell me how HAARP can alter the weather when it only affects the ionsphere? Weather is in the troposphere



posted on Apr, 4 2010 @ 11:25 PM
link   
quake.wr.usgs.gov...

I see no earthquakes registering at 10 KM you fool, you point is void. Every one knows the Illuminati uses the metric system.



posted on Apr, 4 2010 @ 11:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by RedBird

Originally posted by Pillar
reply to post by RedBird
 


what is this crap, dont shoot the messenger.


This is not "crap", this is me pointing out that you need to put on your critical thinking cap and STOP letting random people on the internet shape your worldview for you. You think you are open-minded and enlightened, but you are the very height of ignorance.

I critiqued your post because what you were essentially saying to people was: "Don't think! Just go watch the video!"

That's silly. My time is valuable. Before I invest 10 minutes into watching a video, I want to hear something that sounds remotely convincing. You offered nothing. and when what you DID offer was questioned as irrelevant or meaningless by the first few posters, you retorted by first claiming we were somehow "ruining the chi energy", and then telling us to turn off our brains and just do what you told us to.

You are not the "messenger", people like you are the very source of this type of nonsense and quackery.

You, sir, are the problem with ATS.



I agree 100% with you.

It seems every time some event happens, you have 2000 people here saying "ITZ HAARRP YER GONNA DIEZ!" Or UFO's did it...

It's funny or interesting the first time, but once you look at the 'evidence' you realize you just wasted 20 mins of your life watching a 20 min video with EVERYTHING was based on either numerology, a blurry video of lights in the sky with spooky music and overlay texts 'telling you' what it is--because without the text, we'd be like 'I don't see anything'. Or a number of other 'house of cards' type posts.

Everyone. Don't believe 90% of the internet. And 99.9999% of UFO sites.
Not saying the OP doesn't believe this, but the truth is, this was simply an earthquake on a KNOWN fault.



[edit on 4/4/2010 by Pharyax]



posted on Apr, 4 2010 @ 11:27 PM
link   

Originally posted by schrodingers dog
I have a question ...


Did earthquakes ever happen before the advent of HAARP?


C'mon man.

We all know that a timetraveler used a Stargate to bring HAARP back to the prehistoric days for testing.

Hell...what do you think happened to the dinosaurs!!!11one



posted on Apr, 4 2010 @ 11:32 PM
link   
reply to post by Aberaham Blitzur
 


No you look
3.0 2010/04/04 21:18:09 32.530N 115.663W 2.4 23 km (14 mi) SW of Calexico, CA
3.2 2010/04/04 21:14:22 32.359N 115.561W 2.2 34 km (21 mi) SSW of Mexicali, Baja California, Mexico
2.7 2010/04/04 21:13:03 32.639N 115.791W 3.7 19 km (12 mi) SSW of Seeley, CA
4.4 2010/04/04 21:10:13 32.363N 115.545W 12.1 33 km (20 mi) SSW of Mexicali, Baja California, Mexico
4.3 2010/04/04 21:09:40 32.418N 115.523W 0.2 27 km (16 mi) S of Mexicali, Baja California, Mexico
3.1 2010/04/04 21:02:33 32.492N 115.649W 15.1 25 km (15 mi) SW of Mexicali, Baja California, Mexico
3.5 2010/04/04 20:59:25 32.440N 115.656W 6.9 29 km (18 mi) SW of Mexicali, Baja California, Mexico
2.9 2010/04/04 20:58:46 32.595N 115.808W 0.0 24 km (15 mi) SE of Ocotillo, CA
2.9 2010/04/04 20:56:39 33.177N 115.823W 10.7 17 km (11 mi) W of Obsidian Butte, CA
2.7 2010/04/04 20:55:59 32.692N 115.844W 0.4 15 km ( 9 mi) ESE of Ocotillo, CA
2.6 2010/04/04 20:53:11 32.665N 115.816W 0.0 18 km (11 mi) SW of Seeley, CA
3.4 2010/04/04 20:45:50 32.639N 115.765W 0.5 18 km (11 mi) SSW of Seeley, CA
3.1 2010/04/04 20:44:40 33.068N 115.562W 10.0 7 km ( 4 mi) ENE of Westmorland, CA
2.8 2010/04/04 20:43:09 32.648N 115.800W 1.9 19 km (12 mi) SSW of Seeley, CA
3.2 2010/04/04 20:37:54 33.053N 115.580W 7.5 4 km ( 3 mi) ENE of Westmorland, CA
3.6 2010/04/04 20:31:42 32.705N 115.852W 0.0 14 km ( 9 mi) ESE of Ocotillo, CA
3.2 2010/04/04 20:27:55 32.544N 115.734W 4.0 27 km (17 mi) SW of Calexico, CA
2.9 2010/04/04 20:23:13 32.788N 115.673W 13.1 2 km ( 1 mi) ESE of Seeley, CA
3.1 2010/04/04 20:20:23 32.685N 115.799W 2.5 16 km (10 mi) SW of Seeley, CA
4.9 2010/04/04 20:15:24 32.661N 115.794W 3.9 18 km (11 mi) SW of Seeley, CA
4.1 2010/04/04 20:13:13 33.016N 115.511W 13.7 5 km ( 3 mi) NNE of Brawley, CA
3.9 2010/04/04 20:09:53 32.528N 115.624W 6.1 20 km (12 mi) SW of Mexicali, Baja California, Mexico
3.6 2010/04/04 20:09:51 33.022N 115.969W 7.8 20 km (13 mi) SE of Ocotillo Wells, CA
2.9 2010/04/04 20:05:55 32.669N 115.805W 0.0 17 km (11 mi) SW of Seeley, CA
3.3 2010/04/04 20:04:50 32.582N 115.727W 29.2 24 km (15 mi) S of Seeley, CA
3.2 2010/04/04 20:03:40 32.648N 115.805W 0.1 19 km (12 mi) SW of Seeley, CA
3.5 2010/04/04 20:02:35 32.643N 115.802W 0.0 20 km (12 mi) SSW of Seeley, CA
3.0 2010/04/04 20:01:14 32.622N 115.733W 2.8 19 km (12 mi) SSW of Seeley, CA
4.2 2010/04/04 19:54:34 32.453N 115.619W 14.5 26 km (16 mi) SSW of Mexicali, Baja California, Mexico
2.6 2010/04/04 19:51:30 32.629N 115.806W 4.2 21 km (13 mi) SSW of Seeley, CA
5.1 2010/04/04 18:25:34 32.167N 115.103W 6.0 14 km ( 9 mi) S of Guadalupe Victoria, Baja California, Mexico
5.4 2010/04/04 16:25:09 32.122N 115.061W 10.0 19 km (12 mi) SSE of Guadalupe Victoria, Baja California, Mexico
7.2 2010/04/04 15:40:40 32.128N 115.303W 10.0 26 km (16 mi)

those are around 10km you shill



posted on Apr, 4 2010 @ 11:34 PM
link   
There have been alot of earthquakes in the past months, it may be HAARP.



posted on Apr, 4 2010 @ 11:35 PM
link   
reply to post by Pillar
 


What the what?
First, the quake was a 7.2, upgraded from a 6.9 (69 dude! ugh...sorry...couldn't resist.)
Did someone forget to take their crazed-theory-and-wild-speculation-suppressor meds today?



posted on Apr, 4 2010 @ 11:36 PM
link   
How does that prove this is HAARP or HARP. Seems like every single event has something to do with a conspiracy... I saw shooting stars, it is a conspiracy--the aliens are launching meteors to our earth. Come on now guys everything is not a conspiracy, believe it or not somethings actually just happen and they are a normal event.

[edit on 4-4-2010 by Reign02]



posted on Apr, 4 2010 @ 11:37 PM
link   
reply to post by Pillar
 


First, no name calling.

As for 10km?

So what? For every quake at a depth of 10km, there are an equal amount at other depths.

Exactly why do you think Haarp and 10km are linked. Show hard data on the reasons it only hits and activates at 10km...

Curious....

[edit on 4/4/2010 by Pharyax]



posted on Apr, 4 2010 @ 11:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by TXRabbit

Hell...what do you think happened to the dinosaurs!!!


I thought GWAR killed the dinosaurs.
There's your hidden history!



posted on Apr, 4 2010 @ 11:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by hoghead cheese
There have been alot of earthquakes in the past months, it may be HAARP.


It may seem that way but we're about on average: earthquake.usgs.gov...



posted on Apr, 4 2010 @ 11:41 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Apr, 4 2010 @ 11:44 PM
link   
reply to post by Matthew Dark
 



Did someone forget to take their crazed-theory-and-wild-speculation-suppressor meds today?


Do you mean this GWAR...




posted on Apr, 4 2010 @ 11:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by Moonman1111
How do we even know if there was an earthquake?


Dude, there was totally an earthquake.
My apartment building was shaking, plus it made the news.
I started a thread about it, with some good geological survey data...but...well...
*ahem*
I'll just re-post the survey data:

rev.seis.sc.edu...

rev.seis.sc.edu...

rev.seis.sc.edu...

rev.seis.sc.edu...

Granted...it doesn't look like much now, but if you go back a little bit, you can see pretty substantial seismic activity.
Oh, did I mention that my apartment building shook?




top topics



 
11
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join