It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Magnitude 7.2- BAJA CALIFORNIA, MEXICO 2010 April 04 22:40:39 UTC

page: 10
73
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 5 2010 @ 02:05 AM
link   
this is the page I keep refreshing
every few minutes. It is up to date
on all world earthquakes in real time.

And if u'll look at the last 7 hrs u'll
see nothing but either CA or MX listed
cept for 1 tremor in PR and 1 in Fiji
and 1 in Chile but hundreds in that CA - MX area.

This HAS to be man-made to
be concentrated like this!!!

I guess that is one way to stop
illegal immigrants, is to put an
ocean in their path. Who needs a wall
when u got HAARP?

earthquake.usgs.gov...


[edit on 5-4-2010 by boondock-saint]




posted on Apr, 5 2010 @ 02:13 AM
link   
reply to post by ressiv
 


maybe ur right about the volcano in that area

however in the past it seems those earthquakes caused
by magma from Cerro was between 5 miles deep to the surface
and geographically situated around the volcano.

In this event, there are some earthquakes up to 33 miles deep
and extend all the way up to Northern California.

This is a hell of a lot bigger in scope IMO



posted on Apr, 5 2010 @ 02:17 AM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


possibly... look the affect of the recent eq on long valley...

earthquake.usgs.gov...



posted on Apr, 5 2010 @ 02:17 AM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint
And if u'll look at the last 7 hrs u'll
see nothing but either CA or MX listed
cept for 1 tremor in PR and 1 in Fiji

earthquake.usgs.gov...

That is pretty neat to see that over the past 7-8 hours only 4 earthquakes (Alaska 2.8, Chile 4.5, Puerto Rico 2.6 & 3.1) have not been in the CA/MEX area. 2010/04/04 22:34:51 UTC to present time.

[edit on 5-4-2010 by haaat]



posted on Apr, 5 2010 @ 02:18 AM
link   

Originally posted by ressiv
reply to post by Oozii
 


www.volcanolive.com...



Ah its in San Diego? Well Im pretty sure there's a volcano in Mexicali, or possibly it is Cerro Prieto and claimed by both sides



posted on Apr, 5 2010 @ 02:20 AM
link   

Originally posted by ressiv
possibly... look the affect of the recent eq on long valley...

earthquake.usgs.gov...


OMG
that looks like CA is gonna split off to me,
if it dont split of, then a huge lake
in the making.



posted on Apr, 5 2010 @ 02:23 AM
link   

Originally posted by haaat
That is pretty neat to see that over the past 7-8 hours only 4 earthquakes (Alaska, Chile, Fiji, Puerto Rico) have not been in the CA/MEX area.

that is exactly the point I was making
it appears to be man-made and focused.
somebody posted on another thread
about tracing low freq radio waves in the
AZ area earlier this evening and it had been
adjusting freq like it was trying to find something
or maybe a specific freq to trigger these
earthquakes. Look for that thread
and check it out.



posted on Apr, 5 2010 @ 02:23 AM
link   
Seriously, stop saying this was a man made quake. The cost of living in beautiful Southern California are the quakes. Anyone who lives here can tell you that...



posted on Apr, 5 2010 @ 02:30 AM
link   

Originally posted by Oozii

Originally posted by ressiv
reply to post by Oozii
 


www.volcanolive.com...



Ah its in San Diego? Well Im pretty sure there's a volcano in Mexicali, or possibly it is Cerro Prieto and claimed by both sides


the pinacata is also an option... but very less known about that one..

Mexico Earthquake (Mag 7.2)
A magnitude 7.2 earthquake hit Mexico-California border at 3:40 pm local time on 4th April 2010. The earthquake was felt as far away as Los Angeles. One person was reported killed. The closest volcano to the epicentre is Pinacate 175 km ESE.



posted on Apr, 5 2010 @ 02:33 AM
link   
You know what's weird... I felt dizzy an hour or so before the earthquake and moments before it struck i felt the same feeling.



posted on Apr, 5 2010 @ 02:43 AM
link   
reply to post by mcklzxcire
 


not so weird...if animals feels it before humans do also.. but we pay less attention to it subsonic tremors ore escaping ozon gas...all signs of it..



posted on Apr, 5 2010 @ 02:45 AM
link   
Ahh I didn't not think of that. Thank you for clarifying that.



posted on Apr, 5 2010 @ 02:59 AM
link   
normal HAARP made earthquakes are usually
a standard depth of 6.21 miles deep, which translates
to 10K. Pay attention to the depth .....

notice the new earthquake on that list in the past hr

MAP 5.0 2010/04/05 07:29:13 17.926 -81.548 10.0K CAYMAN ISLANDS REGION

see the 10K depth?

the big one today at 7.2 magnitude was 10K depth

MAP 7.2 2010/04/04 22:40:41 32.128 -115.303 10.0K BAJA CALIFORNIA, MEXICO

what are the odds of that in 2 different
regions of the world ???

HAARP!!!



posted on Apr, 5 2010 @ 03:01 AM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


you should understand the USGS system... 10K is an standard depth before its revised...:-)
impossible for them to give the real depth in such an short time...takes lots of data and calculations to determe the exact location of it..



[edit on 5-4-2010 by ressiv]



posted on Apr, 5 2010 @ 03:08 AM
link   
i think its safe to say were having above average earth movement around the world. melbourne australia for one has had more than 5 earthquakes in 2 years. thats "unusual" for this neck of the woods. i should know i have lived here long enough.

the magic question is what does it all mean??????



posted on Apr, 5 2010 @ 03:11 AM
link   

Originally posted by ressiv
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


you should understand the USGS system... 10K is an standard depth before its revised...:-)
impossible for them to give the real depth in such an short time...takes lots of data and calculations to determe the exact location of it..



[edit on 5-4-2010 by ressiv]


if that is the case then why is the one in Baja still at 10K
and it's over 8 hrs old???

And why has there been over 200 in the past yr
that have yet to be updated??

all with a 10K depth??

just askin ur opinion


r u saying they cannot be measured at all ????



posted on Apr, 5 2010 @ 03:22 AM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


understand its eastern weekend i'll bet there is just an minium staff present at USGS Hq....so relax the data can takes days before its releasd...

for youre convenient here is a link to haarp activity
137.229.36.30...

and to an intteresting site with all data of the world... in dutch but very understandeble ...

www.goto2012.nl... hit this link there (Aarde Portaal)

[edit on 5-4-2010 by ressiv]

[edit on 5-4-2010 by ressiv]



posted on Apr, 5 2010 @ 03:23 AM
link   
5.0
Date-Time Monday, April 05, 2010 at 07:29:12 UTC
Monday, April 05, 2010 at 02:29:12 AM at epicenter
Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones

Location 17.926°N, 81.548°W
Depth 10 km (6.2 miles) set by location program
Region CAYMAN ISLANDS REGION
Distances 155 km (95 miles) S of GEORGE TOWN, Cayman Islands
260 km (160 miles) ENE of Swan Island
390 km (240 miles) NE of Puerto Lempira, Honduras
885 km (550 miles) S of Miami, Florida



posted on Apr, 5 2010 @ 03:33 AM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


5Km, 10Km, and 33Km are the standard default used when either

A) The actual depth of an earthquake cannot be determined due to insufficient data, in which case it remains reported at the default.

B) Data is still being examined to to accurately report the depth, in which case it gets updated when that number is determined.


10Km, or 6.2mi. is the default depth used by the USGS where these quakes are occurring.


Sometimes when depth is poorly constrained by available seismic data, the location program will set the depth at a fixed value. For example, 33 km is often used as a default depth for earthquakes determined to be shallow, but whose depth is not satisfactorily determined by the data, whereas default depths of 5 or 10 km are often used in mid-continental areas and on mid-ocean ridges since earthquakes in these areas are usually shallower than 33 km.


Glossary of Terms on EQ Maps

The depth of an earthquake is vastly harder to pinpoint than the location of the epicenter. Many, many quakes will remain at the default generated by the reporting software because of the quality of the data recorded.

People said the same thing about earthquakes in Iran, claiming they were testing nukes.

Mexico is not testing nukes, and HAARP didn't cause it.. It's a very seismically active area with a great many fault-lines, located between two plate boundaries, right on the edge of the "ring of fire". You can expect hundreds and hundreds of aftershocks in the immediate area following an earthquake of this size.

Nothing out of the norm here.. Take a couple deep breaths.

At least two deaths and over 100 reported injuries so far. Let's hope that number doesn't climb much more.

Peace



posted on Apr, 5 2010 @ 03:40 AM
link   
reply to post by warpcrafter
 


Do you feel safer in the mid-west? The New Madrid fault is more active than I've seen it in a while too. Small tremors, but more than normal. I'm living right on the fault-line and have a bag packed just in case! Is there really anywhere safe from natural disasters?



new topics

top topics



 
73
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join