It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Damian-007
The Norway Spiral is, in my opinion, a once in a lifetime event that may not have been meant to be seen by so many people. Accidently, something went wrong and the Public got to see what is really going on and because of the attention it's gaining, now they are scrambling to try and come up with excuses to tell everyone what it was.
Yes, it involved a Rocket but, something other than a "Normal" Rocket was also involved. I doubt we will ever know exactly what it was..
Oh would it, it would look the same? Oh, well that's good...find us some photos of that...and in that case, also explain to me how the Norway Spiral photos taken from varying places and angles can show a spiral effect?
That picture if taken from the base of the cone would look the same way as the spiral photo with the light as explained by the astronomer who pleaded for calm in the streets of Norway.
Your blaming elves too? that is what the norwegians did, though there is no scientific evidence of santa or elves. there is however a considerable amount of evidence it was a russian missile as I presented in the facts.
The fundamental frequency and its odd harmonics are sourced in a region of the ionosphere where the heating and cooling time constants are about equal. The even harmonics on the other hand are sourced from regions of the ionosphere characterised by ratios of cooling to heating time constant greater than ten. It is thought that the even harmonics are sourced in the lower ionosphere (around 65 km) where the currents are much smaller than at the higher altitudes around 78 km where the currents at the fundamental frequency and odd harmonics maximise.
Originally posted by CHA0S
it would look the same? Oh, well that's good...find us some photos of that...and in that case, also explain to me how the Norway Spiral photos taken from varying places and angles can show a spiral effect?
This is not a once in a lifetime thing, a simple google search reveals thousands of photos displaying this same pattern showing that once again science has all the answers.
Thanks for the links, but I have quite an in depth knowledge of light and refraction due to my physics classes and personal studies. Engineering Studies also allowed me to study optical fiber in depth. I basically understand the quantum aspects of a photon (light), I understand the principles behind light refraction and light propagation through different substances and I understand exactly how that can be used in optical fiber communication. I understand how the light is generated in a laser like fashion so that all photons are in phase and uniform. I understand the quantum processes behind this generation of uniform light. I understand how that light travels through the optical fiber, the different types of optical fiber and how the light is transferred differently in each. I understand how photons interact with atoms to create phenomena such as the photo-electric effect. I understand that visible light is merely a tiny fraction of the entire electro-magnetic spectrum. I have a broad range of scientific knowledge relating to light, I dare say more than you even. Yet, I can see that there is a missing puzzle piece with the Norway Spiral, and I can also see that this thread proves nothing at all.
now to further understand the bending of light or refraction please consult this link:
just plug in the numbers and the proof is staring you right in your eyes, its nothing more then light refraction due to the angle of incidence. I hope this clears up all future misunderstandings now that we all know the truth about this so called display being nothing more then a rocket.
in Norway technology is still in its early stages of development, only due to Norway being more like a third world country when it comes to advanced propulsion systems or liquid fuel research for rocketry. Viewing this by the local natives caused a brief outbreak of mass hysteria. Due to them being a scientific backwater, this kind of event was attributed by them to magic, Haarp, and even a wormhole. Thankfully science is once again kind enough to provide us with the hard hitting truth.
Originally posted by tigpoppa
Also the 2 threads you posted are full of wild speculation ...
Originally posted by xxshadowfaxx
"The norway spiral, is an absolute perfect spiral. It is a spiral of light, not smoke, which rotates perfectly in a single location. It then turned black, in a circular motion, from the inside outwards. Which is really bizzare when you look at it. That is impossible to be a rocket/missle. The black hole that appears would not appear like that from a missle, the light would have all faded away, at the same time, not in a circular motion from the inside (where the light was brightest) outward.
The norway spiral, was not a rocket/missle."
Originally posted by tigpoppa
how primative the norwegians are in their assumption that the spiral was Santa Claus, a mythological being who cohabitates with elves in the North Pole:
Originally posted by tauristercus
Originally posted by tigpoppa
Also the 2 threads you posted are full of wild speculation ...
Wild speculation ???
Somehow I doubt that you've even spent a 1000th of the time on your analysis compared to the extensive research and analysis that I conducted when creating my Norway Spiral thread series of weeks ago.
Perhaps I should have settled for doing a slapdash, poorly researched and insufficiently analyzed job as you have so obviously done ... perhaps just throwing a couple of images together into a pitiful excuse of a thread such as yours, then presenting a ridiculous and unsubstantiated conclusion and I would have saved myself weeks of hard work.
Do us all a favour and go peddle your mediocrity elsewhere and stop trying to insult our intelligence.
Originally posted by Point of No Return
If you would've investigated this more, it would be obvious that was not just a rocket.
Many agreed that it was at least new technology that caused the actual spiral, not a missile failure, or just a rocket.