posted on Jun, 4 2004 @ 07:28 AM
Okay, let's entertain the notion for a moment, that Aussie Bloke is for real and that he has graciously shared his knowledge of the impending doom of
a huge portion of the earth's population (including fish and animals, I might remind some of you animal lovers out there - such an event would do
more damage to animals than humans have ever done, just for the record). The following questions must be asked:
Question: Why did he use Asteroids 199, 005 and 003, when they have been hurtling around in the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter for quite some
time, and yet, in the same breath, he claims these objects are actually chunks from a nova and debris from the oort cloud (two different things, I
might add)? If he knows these are asteroids in the asteroid belt, why is he trying to claim they are rather part of some nova explosion on its way
a) He's lying?
b) He's confused?
c) It wasn't the same Aussie Bloke who listed Asteroids 199, 003 and 005, as the original Aussie Bloke?
d) He thinks 199, 003, and 005 have somehow broken away from the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter and are heading here. This theory though,
defies physics, as the gravitational pull of Mars or Jupiter (depending on the asteroids trajectories) would pull them in before the Earth's would?
e) NASA is lying, and 199, 003, and 005 were never part of the asteroid belt and therefore are actually part of the space junk that's headed here
from the nova explosion or whatever, just as Aussie Bloke said?