It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Obama increased the number of troops in afghanistan instead of sending our boys home, as he promised.
The same policies that Bush pushed thru are still here even though Obama promised to get rid of them and stop the war.
Originally posted by Mr Mask
Originally posted by dizzie56
I seriously wish I had a "universal remote" like Adam Sandler did in Click. That way I could have the time to rewind this and call out all the people that were either for or against Bush but are now either for or against Obama and for the same exact reasons.
1) That is direct proof that you have some agenda at proving who was wrong in the past.
I don't care about that.
2) I don't care how many of you supported Bush, now wear an Obama tee-shirt or how often you flip-flop or fence sit.
It is not important.
3) If you really want to "out those who have changed their minds or political stances based on events or opinions that have newly been presented", then enjoy that quest.
It is on par with the kid who screams "I told you so! I was right, I was right!".
Who cares?
4) I am more concerned with the criminal activity of our country and the theft of a nation's wealth.
Stop seeing this as two parties who are fighting each other for control.
That is a magic trick.
Because I am sick of people demanding a republican is worse then a demoncrat, and that both presidents had some sort of difference between them.
whats your thoughts on him and the TARP fund?
Originally posted by dizzie56
We can all agree, Bush started the bailouts, but Obama sure as hell didnt give any money back or not put his hands in the matter. In fact, if I remember correctly, there was a big-to-do over only allowing Bush to spend the first half of it cause Obama wanted to make sure that he spent the other half.
www.huffingtonpost.com...
Obama increased the number of troops in afghanistan instead of sending our boys home, as he promised.
edition.cnn.com...
He didnt get rid of the patiot act, he reauthorized it.
www.sfexaminer.com...
Lone wolf: Allows the government to track a target without any discernible affiliation to a foreign power, such as an international terrorist group. The provision applies only to non-U.S. persons. The government has never used it.
Business records: Allows investigators to compel third parties, including financial services and travel and telephone companies, to provide access to a suspect’s records without the suspect’s knowledge.
Roving wiretaps: Allows the government to monitor phone lines or Internet accounts that a terrorism suspect may be using, regardless of whether others who are not suspects also regularly use them. The government must provide the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act court with specific information suggesting a suspect is purposely switching means of communication to evade detection.
Originally posted by Jazzyguy
reply to post by dizzie56
Since the beginning, I never believe it's about upholding the consitution and all of those fancy stuff, some people are definitely conveniently going after barack, again.. it is hypocrisy. I know why this happens to barack. There are two things. The first one, the more fundamental one, I rather not say.. it will only aggravate a lot of people. The second one.. it's because barack is biracial and looks african. Too obvious, if it's only about disagreeing to his policy, people won't call him names like Barack Osama, or emphasizing his middle name.
As for barack, why he continues or seemingly to continue the previous administration policy, he has a good excuse for doing that. But his excuse will only last for so long. If he can't prove that his real intent is to stop the neocon policy, eventually people will turn on him, too.
Originally posted by dizzie56
Also, your saying that because he is biracial that is why people make fun of his name? The guy is named BARACK HUSEIN OBAMA. It doesnt take much of a leap, whether the guy is black or white, to make fun of it given what happened with 9/11.
Originally posted by links234
Originally posted by dizzie56
We can all agree, Bush started the bailouts, but Obama sure as hell didnt give any money back or not put his hands in the matter. In fact, if I remember correctly, there was a big-to-do over only allowing Bush to spend the first half of it cause Obama wanted to make sure that he spent the other half.
www.huffingtonpost.com...
You know, it's interesting how you completely forget about the money Obama gave the American taxpayer after he got elected. As whatukno already mentioned, the money being paid back as we speak as well. Selective memory or just not paying attention?
Obama increased the number of troops in afghanistan instead of sending our boys home, as he promised.
edition.cnn.com...
Did you forget why we went to Afghanistan? Al'Qaida being shielded by the Taliban. Why didn't we finish the job? Iraq. Why did we go to Iraq? We thought Saddam was going to give WMD's to Al'Qaida...turns out, he wasn't going to do that.
So now, instead of focusing on terrorism and building an ally in Afghanistan, like we should've been doing the whole time, we focused on rebuilding Iraq after we destroyed it.
Obama pledged to pull out of Iraq, because it was a mistake, and go back to Afghanistan.
He didnt get rid of the patiot act, he reauthorized it.
www.sfexaminer.com...
Quit throwing that around like it matters, it's three provisions of it. Three. Not the whole thing. Here they are:
Lone wolf: Allows the government to track a target without any discernible affiliation to a foreign power, such as an international terrorist group. The provision applies only to non-U.S. persons. The government has never used it.
Business records: Allows investigators to compel third parties, including financial services and travel and telephone companies, to provide access to a suspect’s records without the suspect’s knowledge.
Roving wiretaps: Allows the government to monitor phone lines or Internet accounts that a terrorism suspect may be using, regardless of whether others who are not suspects also regularly use them. The government must provide the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act court with specific information suggesting a suspect is purposely switching means of communication to evade detection.
Emphasis mine. Source.