Hello all, I am writing this post in response to the few self described common law experts who keep saying we are slaves, Common Law isn't real, if
you use Common Law they will throw you in prison. I am putting it in Skunk works for lack of a better place.
1. We, the People are creations of God - NOT creations of government.
2. The RIGHTS of LIFE, LIBERTY, PROPERTY and the PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS are bestowed upon us by our Creator - NOT by government.
3. We, the People create government and install kings, queens, prime ministers or presidents as our servant.
4. As creator of government, we are the "MAJESTY", and government is our servant.
5. When the men and women, acting as members of a SERVANT government, scheme to overthrow the "MAJESTY" of the MASTER and subjugate or destroy the
SOVEREIGN PEOPLE, there exists the crime of HIGH TREASON.
From the 1893 Dictionary of Law:
Treason: Betrayal, treachery, breach of faith or allegiance.
Treason may exist only as between allies: it is a general appellation to denote not only offenses against the king and government, but also
accumulation of guilt which arises whenever a superior reposes a confidence in a subject or inferior, between whom and himself there subsists a
natural, a civil, or even a spiritual relation, and the inferior so abuses that confidence, so forgets the obligations of duty, subjugation, and
allegiance, as to destroy the life of the superior.
When disloyalty attacks majesty itself it is called, by way of distinction, high treason, equivalent to the 'crimen loesoe majestatis' of the
High treason is the most heinous civil crime a man can commit. If indeterminate, this alone is sufficient to make a government degenerate into
For the following essay, the word "Crown" will be used for the word "Government." We are all, for the sake of argument, British subjects.
The American Government, at all levels, by use of a ["STRAWMAN", a sound alike name of the name by which you have been called all your life, but
usually spelled in all capital letters or family name first, and called a "PERSON". The deceit is in the government's (Crown) making the family
name as the paramount name, a "surname", where the root word "sur" means over, above, primary, and the given name(s) as a reference name. This is
opposite to the intentions of one's parents, and opposite of the origin and status of a "family" name - that being a reference name for the
primary, or given names. That fraudulent name is then inscribed on a government money value instrument called a 'birth certificate'. In one's
using/acknowledging the birth certificate name as being "one and the same" as oneself, that fraud intended name, it carries with its use, the status
of 'plantation slave'. Have a Birth Certificate? We all do, except for some very old people. We are then slaves.
The 'all caps' spelling is a code signifying that the slave has been pledged as a debtor in the bankruptcy of the Crown. All western nations were
declared bankrupt in 1930. The deceit by government in teaching people to use the birth certificate name through the educational system makes all
Canadians SUBJECT to the CROWN by changing our status to that of a FEUDAL SERF of the MIDDLE AGES. For several hundred years, the British Monarchy
bestowed 'privileges' (falsely called rights) on 'subjects' (sometimes called 'citizens'), but this ceased with the 1930 bankruptcy.
Since that time, these 'privileges', including 'due process of law' has been slowly removed, and the 'slaves' have been subjected to increased
forced extraction of their labour and life (life is time spent) by way of taxation and inflation of fiat counterfeit money. This is how people have
been deprived of the protections of such documents as the Magna Carta 1225, the Habeas Corpus Act, the Bill of Rights, The Petition of Rights, and the
To George W. Bush, the Constitution is nothing but a "goddamn piece of paper."
(his words, not mine.)
This is a deliberate act of HIGH TREASON against the People of America, as it results in the loss of the Creator bestowed rights of LIFE, LIBERTY and
PROPERTY, and the right to a common law court (due process of law).
Learn the facts about the Vatican's and British Crown's continued claimed ownership of the USA; and, their continued collection of 'tribute' from
Americans through the Pope's 'Holy Roman Empire'.
Read about this here.www.detaxcanada.org...
The UNITED STATES is a corporation, and Congress is a 'body politic' - both being Roman style incorporations (make-believe ships) under the original
creation/ownership of the Pontifex Maximus (Pope) of the (still existent) Holy Roman Empire. All Roman Law documents (so-called constitutions; but, in
fact, are 'ship's orders' of make-believe ships), when used as the guide to operate a country under Roman Law, always contain a "notwithstanding"
clause (In the US Constitution, it is the 'general welfare' clause). This allows the "captain of the ship", the President, or a designated officer
(judge or Cabinet member) leave to disregard any provision of such a constitution at his discretion. 'The CAPTAIN may deviate from ANY 'rules or
regulations' when he DEEMS it necessary for the GOOD of the ship.' That is a basic maxim of the Law of the Sea, and totally within the 'common
sense' realm of operating a ship relative to safety and profitability; however, it is devastating to the unalienable rights of an individual free
will man or woman living upon the land.
Also, it has recently come to light that the court systems operate their admiralty type law within the confines of a 'contract' in all of the
British, and former British Empire. The clerk of the court, the prosecuting attorneys, and the judges proffer the contract, and the defendant blindly
and ignorantly accepts the offered contract by acquiescence and obedience to court orders and sentences. A defendant convicted and sentenced, even by
a jury (in an admiralty/equity court) only need to inform the judge that he/she refuses the offered contract and/or sentence of the judge. As a
contracting party, the defendant does not have to accept a contract by imposition against his/her free will. As has happened, when such a refusal of
the contract is made, the judge will use legal trickery and bluster to attempt to get the defendant to accept another contract. The defendant need
only to continue with: "I do not accept your sentence." Or, where applicable: "I do not accept your offer of contract." The latter statement may
be placed upon served court documents and returned (signed and dated) to the clerk of the court.
See, United States Executive Order 10834
GET THAT GOLD FRINGE OFF MY FLAG!
Patriots are subjected to much ridicule when they object to [Admiralty flag] the flag that appears in every government office and courtroom in the
That flag is the United States flag... with one seemingly minor cosmetic
difference - a knotted golden fringe on three sides.
Government officials and judges adamantly refuse requests to remove the gold fringed flag and replace it with the constitutional flag of the United
States as defined in 4 U.S.C. Section 1,2, and 3 - which has NO fringe.
After the English surrendered at Yorktown, the Articles of Confederation period followed. Then our Founding Fathers implemented the Constitution into
this Public Trust, which was the mechanism to provide for us our hopes and aspirations. In the Constitution you will find principles; but, not
necessarily those found in the Declaration of Independence.
Note: To learn the reality of the grand deception by the Founding Fathers, read here.www.yale.edu...
Some of the writers of the Constitution thought it was a little too restrictive. It was generally conceded, for instance, that the people had the
right to bear arms, but they also knew that if we ever were placed or allowed ourselves to be brought under Maritime Admiralty Law concerning our
persons and property, we would have dire need of a guarantee for our rights -- thus, the ten amendments were added to the Constitution, and that
became the substantive part of the Constitution. Article III, Section 2, of the Constitution defines the Maritime Admiralty jurisdiction.
How have we been tricked out of our Common Law rights; and, into the Admiralty courts? How has equity as well as Admiralty been corrupted? How has the
Federal Government made it almost impossible for us to receive our constitutional rights -- our substantive rights in the Constitution?