It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

241,200 Years of Kings

page: 3
17
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 24 2010 @ 03:51 PM
link   
This is all very interesting but there is one major flaw.

There is no supporting geological evidence for a global flood.




posted on Apr, 24 2010 @ 04:36 PM
link   
reply to post by aorAki
 


Oh he's right no evidence. Time to pack it in. Why did we even look
under this rock in the first place. No evidence everybody go home.

That isn't the only flaw. The years involved are potentially a flaw.
The whole thread investigates the posibility of a flaw.
There is also no evtdence for a global longer life span either.
Where's your big revealing anouncement for that?

[edit on 24-4-2010 by randyvs]



posted on Apr, 24 2010 @ 05:34 PM
link   
The Long Lived Sumerian Kings
April 24, 2010

Serbsta, you have stumbled on evidence that can be somewhat explained, but I doubt a lot of people will believe it. I will relate the causes for you below.

First, I have to take it on your say so that these guys were all Sumerian, because that is important or key identification that explains a few things. Second, these kings did live quite long lives but the reigns are exaggerated. A 1,000 years old would not be out of the ordinary for them.

The answer is racial. Or at least part of the answer has to do with the origin of the Sumerians. Here is a little history then:

Approximately 250,000 years ago there occurred a major rebellion. The then ruling chief whose headquarters were located in what is today southern Iraq and on land which extended several hundred kilometers under what is now the Persian Gulf. This ruling chief was a spiritual being and not visible to the tribes around him. However, this chief depended on a visible staff so modified in body form so that they may continue to serve the chief indefinitely. When the chief rebelled, the material staff took sides. Some stood up for the chief while others fled the region.

The material staff of this chief numbered 100 and of that 100 about 60 of them chose to stay with the chief. One of the staff was named “Nod”. Up until this time, the chief had been following the rules that no sexual liaisons were to be instituted, but upon the rebellion, he gave Nod and the others permission to experiment with reproduction of their kind. The rebels were attempting to increase their numbers in order to maintain their influence in the region.

Nod produced many children with others of the rebels staff and founded what became known as a separate race on our planet - the Nodites. The land of Nod was the headquarter area where the greatest accumulation of offspring resided and from where they projected their influence and power into the region.

The Nodites overspread the middle eastern areas and established racial identity as the Syrian Nodites, the pre-sumerian Nodites, the Elamite Nodites, and mingled with what is now Turkey to form a distinct grouping with the Vanites (who were established around Lake Van in those days. The lake takes its name from the material staff leader, Van, who remained loyal). What is essential to know is that Nod’s genetics were not strictly evolutionary, but contained those antibodies in the blood stream which allowed his body system to connect to the rejuvenating spiritual circuits keeping him (and others of the material staff) alive indefinitely.

Upon the rebellion taking place, Nod and the other rebel material staff had those rejuvenating circuits cut off. They could no longer access them and, in effect, humanized and eventually had to face mortality just as any human does. Nod arrived to be in service to the chief about 500,000 years ago, and served for 250,000 years by his side before the rebellion. Upon entering into rebellion with the chief, Nod lost the circuits and lived another 2 or 3 thousand years until the body was exhausted. Nod passed on the genetics of these extraordinary inheritance factors. But in each generation that followed, the length of life continued to lessen until the race became so admixed with the other evolutionary races on the planet that they aged as the rest of the world was doing. Because Nod was respected for his expertise in industry and trade and was a leader directly associated with the rebel chief, his sons in particular became candidates to be kings and chiefs of their kind in lands far distant to the Nodite homeland.

The Tower of Bable:
After the submergence of Dalamatia (the Iraqi old city of the chief) the Nodites moved north and east, presently founding the new city of Dilmun as their racial and cultural headquarters. And about fifty thousand years after the death of Nod, when the offspring of the chief’s staff had become too numerous to find subsistence in the lands immediately surrounding their new city of Dilmun, and after they had reached out to intermarry with the surrounding tribes adjoining their borders, it occurred to their leaders that something should be done to preserve their racial unity. Accordingly a council of the tribes was called, and after much deliberation the plan of Bablot, a descendant of Nod, was endorsed.

The Nodites could not agree on the tower design and split between those who wished to glorify the Nodite people and those who sought to dedicate the tower to a religious purpose. The religious group were promptly voted down. The majority rejected the teaching that their ancestors had been guilty of rebellion; they resented such a racial stigma. Having disposed of one of the three angles to the dispute (the religious faction) and failing to settle the other two by debate, they fell to fighting. The religionists, the noncombatants, fled to their homes in the south, while their fellows fought until well-nigh obliterated.

About twelve thousand years ago a second attempt to erect the tower of Babel was made. The mixed races of the area (Nodites (long heads and dark hair) mixing with and an early white race (pre-Caucasian)) undertook to raise a new temple on the ruins of the first structure, but there was not sufficient support for the enterprise; it fell of its own pretentious weight. This region was long known as the land of Babel.

A Final Note:
I am telling true history which originates from the ancient records of the rebel chief. When they are made available to the general public, much of the history of the Middle East will have to be revived to show that many of its people were admixed with the slaves of the evolutionary races and of the aristocracy of the spiritual world. Now before anyone begins to say this may explain how the Egyptians built the pyramids, I can say from that record, the pyramids were man made and mainly because the Egyptians were very talented engineers. They did not receive superhuman help. The tradition of temple building and grand palaces were part of the inheritance of the grandeur of the original chief’s headquarters sent here to upstep the intellectual and spiritual lives of a primitive world. It ended in an unmitigated disaster and in many respects, the Nodites were an accidental race. No one foresaw what would happen and what the consequences would be.

Thank you



posted on Apr, 24 2010 @ 06:33 PM
link   
"If they do not hear Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded through one rise from the dead." Luke 16


The beetle cocoon that was manna for Moses



[edit on 24-4-2010 by elusive1]



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 02:09 AM
link   
reply to post by serbsta
 



A rulers name could have been carried through his children as Hestaput carried her lovers name - a dynastic tradition of sorts or it may have been a case that these pre-Sumer races had different asrological or astronomical names than we use today and the terms 'ruling houses' or 'kings' were not meant to infer actual humans but were planetary alignments or some otehr units of measurement that dominated the period etc..so we could be presuming or assuming the word King and Rule to be other than what they appear to be or the word "year" - was it a solar year, a cycle of procession year a galatic year? etc...that, or...a single human man lived 38,000 years. :/
Who knows! lol. I dont know which is correct.


good luck in your search for clarity.




[edit on 25-4-2010 by Rosha]



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 03:10 AM
link   
The bible imply s that Angels live a very long time and in the days before the flood the Nephlim [?] took daughters of men for wives, could it be the offspring of such a union could explain the long life spans? And wasn't the purpose of the flood [for some customs] the annihilation of these Nephlim and offspring?

If these Angels, Nephlim, aliens would take humans as wives you could assume they would be fully engaged in all human affairs.



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 04:55 PM
link   
Ron Howard was Cocoon, not James Cameron.

My mistake, lol.

By the way, I'm wondering, if you gentlemen haven't yet researched telomerase boosters, which lengthen the telomeres, the protective aglets on the ends of our DNA, allowing cell division beyond the Heyflick limit. Contrary to what many scientists expected, this had a cancer preventative effect and longevity effect.

This epitalon by Khavinson, has been around for a long time, and its a nasal spray potent synthetic epithalamus hormone analagous to epithalamus epithalamin. I've contacted their company, and they are doing human trials in Australia.

Peptide promotes overcoming of the division limit in human somatic cell.
Khavinson VKh, Bondarev IE, Butyugov AA, Smirnova TD.
Bull Exp Biol Med. 2004 May;137(5):503-6.

Still don't think a human body can last if it's cared for?


[edit on 25-4-2010 by elusive1]



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 06:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by aorAki
This is all very interesting but there is one major flaw.

There is no supporting geological evidence for a global flood.



but then there is the assumption the flood was purely a physical event!

...if every nation on earth 'remembers' 'waters' rising..and biblically the word 'waters' represents people and nations...then there is a whole new field of study to be had.

I believe though that apart from cultural mythos', there IS enough evidence for massive sea level rise geologically speaking...its there you just need to scour past the excited pontification to get to it.

Ro



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 06:17 PM
link   
Eustatic sea-level rise does not equate to a global inundation covering all but the highest mountains (lol Mt Ararat).

[edit on 25-4-2010 by aorAki]



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 09:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by aorAki
Eustatic sea-level rise does not equate to a global inundation covering all but the highest mountains (lol Mt Ararat).

[edit on 25-4-2010 by aorAki]


No but our knowledge of it does lend itself to a need to readdress our perspective of the word "flood", to not hold a one eyed view of that word in light of new evidence, we need to comprehend and apply a correct context to the word as it was understood then, and then determine its difference with how it is viewed today. Too, if comprehending Gods will in allowing the event is of interest to you, then determining what was anger led destruction and what was simply natural cause and affect is important.

Our knowledge of mega tsunami's, volcanic impacts and earths entry into regions of space dominated by metorite anjd cosmic particle activity and also elecotromagentic changes in the sun and photosynthesis led ELE's also needs to be included....they are prexisting variables that were not understood or contemplated at the time of the epic of gilgamesh or story of noah, and many valued judgments made and attributed to Divine origin can now be reasonably ruled out . Holding on to a viewpoint because what you think, you think is fact and because you cant fathom an alternative possibility..just isnt good science.

Given Arrarat does not even appear on the top 100 list of highest mountains in the world* it can hardly be said there wasnt an enormous ammount of untouched land that was not under flood at the time of the arks arrival on the mount (which also necessitates we also redefine the word ark given that we know today that the entire genome of the entire planets life forms can fit into a shell the size of a pea) so the word 'global' deluge has to have meant something different to those people then, than what we would assume it to mean today....at the very least, it begs further examination.

I have no doubt a man called Noa existed and his familty were preserved through spiritual forces throughout that time period...but so were many other families...all around the world...which alone, begs we address the fundementalist religous view of the *intent* of the flood and the single family orign of the second race of man that stemed form THAT assumption, very cautiously.

* en.wikipedia.org...



Ro




[edit on 25-4-2010 by Rosha]



posted on Apr, 25 2010 @ 09:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by serbsta
reply to post by SLAYER69
 


OK, let's say that these weren't individual life spans and that it was more of a 'house rule' or descendant rule that allowed for such high numbers. What are we left with?

We are still left with something that by today's accepted history shouldn't be. We are left with with a much, much older civilization than currently thought, even if it was based on descendant rule.


Not really.

"House of" perspective in a base 60 numbering system, equals 500 year dynasties.



posted on Apr, 26 2010 @ 02:33 AM
link   
reply to post by serbsta
 





How is this possible? You could imply that the base 60 system was in use here, hence dividing the amount of years in each kinship, we are still left with an average of 500-600 ruling years per king, once again, how is this possible?


It is possible because it is a code for the precession of the zodiac, not a history of actual dynasties.

There are many king lists like this. And Joseph Campbell discussesother places where the number is codified, such as the "Poetic Edda" of Scandanavia and the "Purana" of the Indus valley.



posted on Jun, 2 2013 @ 11:09 AM
link   
reply to post by serbsta
 


Hello,
Long life and giantism may go together. If a creature lives longer, then it has a longer growth period, and so it will grow bigger. This especially applies to reptiles that continue to grow their whole lives. So, if creatures were healthier and lived monger in the past, then we should find bigger creatures.

I went through every animal that exists today, eg dog, cat, lion, cow, horse, ape, man, and in each case I googled - giant dog Pleistocene, giant cat pliestocene, giant ape pleistocene etc.

What I found was that giant forms of all the current animals lived in the pleistocene. It was an age of giants.
I found a giant horse, giant cows, giant dogs, giant donkeys, giant zebras, giant giraffes, giant beavers, giant bears, giant lions, giant pigs, giant apes, giant humans - all in the fossil record.

And all these creatures lived only 10,000 years ago , immediately prior to our current age, which is the Holocene

So this age of giants is kind of linked to longevity.

If you would like me to send you my research, then you can message me





edit on 2-6-2013 by Craig373 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 4 2013 @ 03:20 PM
link   
Remember. If we continue another 1,000 years as a species, future historians will be debating on whether or not we really worshiped Clark Kent and Bruce Wayne.
It will go something like this: "Bruce Wayne was a real person. We know this because of all the historical references. Superman was obviously a mythological creation of primitive man to reflect the greatness of King Wayne."



new topics

top topics



 
17
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join