Originally posted by MrWendal
Ok, so here are my videos, the first shows the impact of the North Tower. Granted, you really do not see any plane due to the focus not being on the towers itself until after impact, but you are correct that this video does not show a plane.

Maybe a grainy, low-quality internet video would be hard to tell that there's a plane. But look at the DVD and it's a different story.

how in the world did this theory even get started LMAO
Was the normal 9-11 conpiracies not good enough for some die hard conpiracy theorists?? People are so gullible and they will believe anything that someone says. Those are the type of people that would drink the poisoned kool-aid so they can go ride on a UFO behind a comet.

There were definately planes that hit the world trade center on 9/11. You say to use your common sense, well here goes. Which would be easier setting it up so that a couple of planes are extremely vulnerable and have some guys who believe in their cause highjack said planes and ram them into the world trade center? Or some how getting hundreds of people to lie about what they saw that day, accept edited videos and air them, have people with cameras film the same empty space in the sky so that they can later edit a plane into them, and have many private videos of the second plane hitting the tower and people reacting with words like " oh my god another plane just hit?"
For your theory to work many people would have to de going along with a lie, had been paid off, and/or are extremely evil. I dont buy it.

Originally posted by ugie1028
There were planes... I AM A WITNESS... YEP THATS RIGHT!

So please enlighten us on what the planes looked like and what markings were on them.

Oh and please do not parrot the media BS.



[edit on 3-4-2010 by REMISNE]

Of all of the 9/11 theories that leave me shaking my head, the no planes one is the biggest.

OP - are you saying that everyone who saw the planes hit the towers on that day is a liar?

Seriously?

Every independent person, journalist, policeman, firecrew member - every single one of them that was looking up at the first tower and saw the second jet fly right into the towers...every one of them was a liar?

Every one?

Really?

Originally posted by PookztA
Another reason is because many of the hijackers have been reported to be alive and well.

Hijackers being alive and well has absolutely nothing to do with physical planes hitting the towers.

Originally posted by PookztA
Another reason I believe commercial airliners did not hit the towers is because many videos have shown some type of infrared light-targetting mechanism on the WTC buildings.

Many videos show it? That would be disinformation because only one video shows what you claim. If it was a laser, you would see it in every video, but we do not. That's your first clue that it's disinformation.

Secondly, in the first video you show, the lights have to be off to look at the infra-red light being emitted from remotes. With the lights off, you can point a remote at a white wall and can see the infra-red light shining the wall. Turn the lights back on and you can not see the infra-red light, meaning the "light" at the WTC was not an infra-red targeting light because it is daylight.

It happens to be a piece of paper floating in the air, by the way. Been debunked for at least 4 years now.

Originally posted by PookztA
And here is just one of several types of remote piloted cruise missiles which could have been used

Most cruise missiles are super-sonic and travel near twice the speed of sound or around 1320 mph.

Secondly, cruise missiles are tiny compared to jetliners and do not have anywhere near 160-foot wingspans.

Originally posted by PookztA
Chopper 5 & the Missing Shadow

Missing shadow? You gotta be kidding me?



The shadow is perfectly visible. This is blatant and purposeful disinformation.

Originally posted by PookztA
I just see too much evidence contradicting the "airliner" story to accept it without a doubt.

The "evidence" has just been debunked. Oh and saying that there is no shadow when there actually is, isn't evidence of anything but purposeful dishonesty and blatant disinformation.

Originally posted by REMISNE
So please enlighten us on what the planes looked like and what markings were on them.

United Airlines paint scheme on the plane that hit the south tower:

Originally posted by warisover
An eyewitness to the "plane" impact to the Pentagon was Mike Walter.

NPT and tv fakery "theories" deal with the planes at the WTC, as well as this thread. So how about we keep things on topic, thanks.

So a few years ago, I actually believed this nonsense. Yes I call it nonsense, or shananigans..

You can't just make that many people from 4 different flights "dissapear" in the span of a few hours.

There is far too much evidence.

Look, we all know 9/11 was fishy at best, but let's not go all crazy here.

There were planes.

Perhaps not in Shanksville or the Pentagon, I still haven't made up my mind about that, but at the WTC, yeah, there were planes.

~Keeper