Why do pictures that show tankers refueling, never have contrails?, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 31-3-2010 @ 06:47 PM by weedwhacker
reply to post by 911stinks



"logic" says 'chemtrails'?

Not following that.

Firstly, I looked up the images, too. Every one of them were close-ups of the airplanes involved. Contrails form some distance behind the engines, not seen in those photos.

Also, contrails don't form ALL of the time, either.

Secondly, MOST airborne re-fueling OPS occur at the lower altitudes...

For security sake, we'll just give estimates. First off, generally speaking, the refueling altitudes are fairly standardized between FL19-250, with some of the slow/low flyers needing lower. The altitude is normally chosen based on threat and traffic requirements. If higher is needed, the KC-10 is required to stay 2,000 feet below optimum cruise altitude for a given GW, not to exceed 30,000ish. Above that, the maneuvering / thrust penalties very rapidly outweigh any fuel flow / drag benefits for air refueling.


www.airliners.net...

AND, if that doesn't convince, there is THIS:

www.vusn.org...


Sorry...."chemtrails" are pure fantasy, a product of over-active imaginations. combined with the rise of the Internet (and the greed of certain shady people who have found a way to make a living off of the gullibility of others).


reply posted on 31-3-2010 @ 06:56 PM by 911stinks
reply to post by weedwhacker



Is that why I have a microfiche from a US govt. depository library, entitled Chemtrails?

It is dated 1991. Included all the chemicals used, and a nice section on acid rain.

It was a course at the Air Force Academy.



reply posted on 31-3-2010 @ 07:08 PM by Brother Stormhammer
Originally posted by 911stinks
reply to
post by weedwhacker



Is that why I have a microfiche from a US govt. depository library, entitled Chemtrails?

It is dated 1991. Included all the chemicals used, and a nice section on acid rain.

It was a course at the Air Force Academy.


I don't suppose you could post scans / prints from the fiche, or the document or class title? It would be nice to actually see some evidence that can be checked and verified.


reply posted on 31-3-2010 @ 07:11 PM by weedwhacker
reply to post by 911stinks



That's been discussed, months ago, right here on ATS.

Was that with you, under a different ATS member name?

As I recall, it was an oblique reference to one title or chapter in an Air Force Academy textbook on chemistry, for one of the Chemistry Courses from their Syllabus...

Did you read the entire thing, or just pick out the word "chemtrail" and jump on it?


reply posted on 31-3-2010 @ 07:13 PM by COOL HAND
Does this count?

LINK

I am sure there are more if you want to go look for them.


reply posted on 20-4-2010 @ 09:11 AM by GAOTU789
reply to post by 911stinks



Yes, I am sure you wouldn't want the debunkers to stomp all over it would you.


Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Amazing video of 747 lifting in place in extreme wind conditions
  Posted 1 days ago with 11 member flags
Eerie Second World War RAF fighter plane discovered in the Sahara
  Posted 16 days ago with 8 member flags
Stealth chopper based in Nevada
  Posted 16 days ago with 4 member flags
HIFiRE Scramjet Research Flight Will Advance Hypersonic Technology
  Posted 14 days ago with 2 member flags