It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"The Hebrew word for ‘day’ is ‘yom’ and this word can occasionally be used to mean an indefinite period of time, if the content warrants. In the overwhelming preponderance of its occurrences in the O.T., however, it means a literal day… Still further, the plural form of the word (Hebrew 'yamim') is used over 700 times in the O.T. and always, without exception, refers to literal ‘days.’" (The Bible Has the Answers, Henry Morris, p. 94).
Originally posted by ventian
reply to post by wylekat
I'm not about to read the whole bible and certainly not about to learn Hebrew to read the original. The thing that turned me off was the fact that I heard about the book of Jesus and the fact that the church wouldn't allow it. The one book from your messiah, and you refuse to allow it in the regular bible sounds fishy to me. The fact that it states that you are your own church definitely ruffles feathers in these holy institutions. I gotta hand it to Christians though. They believe in their creator based off of faith alone. The science community has the luxury of stating everything as a theory while at the same time presenting everything they believe in as a fact.
Originally posted by liquidself
reply to post by impaired
I guess it s really fun and supercool to attack people s religion. Apparently you are convinced that you can convince "Christians (people you are apparently feel free to lump all in one conveniant category regardless of whether they are Protestant, Catholic, Methodist, Mormon, Baptist, Jehovah's Witness, Nestorian or Anglican) which IMHO makes you as much of a BIGOTED zealot as those you imagine to be baiting. Obviously your beliefs are the one true faith. Why dont you enlighten us?
[edit on 31-3-2010 by liquidself]
Originally posted by liquidself
reply to post by impaired
I guess it s really fun and supercool to attack people s religion. Apparently you are convinced that you can convince "Christians (people you are apparently free to lump all in one conveniant category regardless of whether they are Protestant, Catholic, Methodist, Mormon, Baptist, jehovah's Witness, Nestorian or Anglican) which makes you as much of a BIGOTED zeaslot as they are. Obviously your beliefs are one true faith. Why dont you enlighten us?
I don't have a problem with looking at the bible with a historic point of view (putting into account translation errors, archaic vernacular, etc).
Darwin recanted on his deathbed. This is completely fabricated and has no foundation in truth whatsoever. A woman named “Lady Hope” spoke to a church group shortly after the death of Charles Darwin. She claimed that she was at Darwin’s bedside on the day of his death. She also claimed that Darwin recanted on evolution and accepted Jesus on his deathbed. Her claims are not only unsupported, but are directly opposed by Darwin’s daughter, Henrietta. Henrietta stated “I was present at his deathbed, Lady Hope was not present during his last illness, or any illness. I believe he never even saw her, but in any case she had no influence over him in any department of thought or belief. My father never recanted any of his scientific views, either then or earlier. I am upset that the U.S. Christians have fabricated this conversion nonsense. The whole story has no foundation whatever.” February 23, 1922.
Evolution has been proven false (is only a theory). Evolution can be divided into two parts, macro and micro. Micro evolution is a fact, where as macro evolution remains a theory due to debates on the exact steps of the evolutionary process. EVOLUTION DID HAPPEN we simply can’t trace the exact evolutionary steps of the of the 3 trillion plus species on earth. Considering there is no way that we can even prove if we have located all the species on earth, this may always remain a theory. We can prove though, beyond a doubt, that humans have evolved. We can trace it back conclusively 3.6 million years. 97% of all scientists accept evolution (so does the Catholic Church). Christians have spread lies about this excessively, they especially like to say evolution preaches that Humans evolved from monkeys. Evolution does not state that humans evolved from monkeys, that idea is completely absurd. Science states that monkeys and humans evolved from a shared forefather and are hence relatives, (all primates are) but we are in no way direct descendants of them.
Atheists have no morals. All one has to do is take a look at the American prison system. Nearly 76% of violent criminals are Christian and NO, most of these Christians did not convert after conviction, they were Christian at the time of the crime. The greatest genocides in human history stemmed from the Christian faith. If you examine secular societies in comparison to religious societies; secular societies will consistently have less crime, unemployment, corruption and more freedom, share of wealth and a higher standard of living. Nearly EVERY single advancement towards morality (I.E: ceasing native genocide, freeing the slaves and women’s suffrage) was OPPOSED by the church and Christian organizations.
This United States is a country founded on Christianity. This is the biggest sack of horse # and only an EXTREME MORON would believe something this retarded. The VERY FIRST AMENDMENT of the constitution is based on the Separation of church and state. The paramount reason why the forefathers came to this country was for religious freedom. They listed it as their top goal in forming America. Matter of fact most of the fore fathers weren’t even Christian, but deist, atheist and agnostic. I could site thousands of quotes which piss on this lie from Washington, Franklin, Jefferson, Paine, etc. but I shouldn’t need to, considering the reading of the constitution is a 4th grade curriculum requirement.
There are no atheists in foxholes. I hear this one on a weekly basis and it never ceases to amuse/disgust me. One third of the world’s population does not believe in a deity. The largest concentration of free thinkers is found in Asia, which participated in each world war and have been feuding over territory with the surrounding regions for thousands of years (especially Japan and China). My father is an atheist and served during the Berlin Crisis. I am an atheist and though I wasn’t in a fox hole, I faced death while giving birth and I tell you that the thought about God NEVER crossed my mind when I heard my condition could be fatal. I have had the privilege to meet hundreds of atheists who served in WW2 and Vietnam, each of whom sat in fox holes. For more information about atheists in the military see the Military Association of Atheists and Freethinkers website.
There is one specific thread I would love to post those ten points in... but, it would be wasted.
Originally posted by wylekat
reply to post by impaired
I don't have a problem with looking at the bible with a historic point of view (putting into account translation errors, archaic vernacular, etc).
The problem comes when you point out these facts to certain of people, and they scream, grit their teeth and try to personally banish you to hell for even *thinking* their book has errors- even proven ones!
If the bible has errors, These people should be looking to CORRECT them, not accuse the person pointing them out as sinners or worse. If I make something (let's say a model of the Millennium Falcon- I am working on one), and I am trying to be accurate- and someone points out an error or a few I made in my 'accurate' rendition- you can be assured I will stop my work on it, go back, and make darn sure I fix the inaccuracy to the best of my ability.
HOWEVER
It's a model. A piece of plastic. It can be broken, it can be stolen... How much LESS important is it than a HOLY BOOK?! A holy book its readers just take on blind, uneducated faith it's right! I dunno about anyone else, but I'd rather a book I base my life and very soul upon to be COMPLETELY, and without a doubt, CORRECT. And if you can find educated scholars, Hebrew language experts, and the like saying it might not be- then the religion as a whole needs to get up off their duff and do something about it!
Otherwise, just come out with a Mad Libs version and be done with it right there.
Unless I m sorely mistaken the sole intent of this thread is to troll for "Christians" who exhibit one or more of the 10 "signs"; my point is that that intent is in itself inherently negative.
Originally posted by liquidself
reply to post by ashanu90
Unless I m sorely mistaken the sole intent of this thread is to troll for "Christians" who exhibit one or more of the 10 "signs"; my point is that that intent is in itself inherently negative. My "problem" is that it is simply not true that because they all come from the same "damn book" that they are all therefore identical. For me this is the essence of prejudice; and if you think that the variety of different Christian religions are "all the same" then that seems like a very unproductive "vibe".
It wouldn't happen to be the one where I stomped out accusing certain people of slapping backs and sniffing each others butts now, would it?
Originally posted by liquidself
reply to post by ashanu90
Unless I m sorely mistaken the sole intent of this thread is to troll for "Christians" who exhibit one or more of the 10 "signs"; my point is that that intent is in itself inherently negative. My "problem" is that it is simply not true that because they all come from the same "damn book" that they are all therefore identical. For me this is the essence of prejudice; and if you think that the variety of different Christian religions are "all the same" then that seems like a very unproductive "vibe".
And here's a contradiction right here: Ok. If all Christians are not the same, then they are in direct conflict with the bible.