It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

4 electrons

page: 1
2
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 31 2010 @ 12:26 AM
link   
Should I place this in the Apollo mission philosophy section?


I have a question:

4 electrons.

Why on earth would that be a significant thing to the Apollo Block II Spacecraft?


Anyone?





posted on Mar, 31 2010 @ 12:56 AM
link   
I have no idea what you are talking about.....

Please tell me some more......



posted on Mar, 31 2010 @ 01:15 AM
link   
Why would 4 electrons be important to the Command and Service Modules of the Apollo Spacecraft?

What Philosophy of the CSM, would 4 electrons be apart of?



posted on Mar, 31 2010 @ 01:19 AM
link   
Why would this even rate the single flag it's been given when we (I) have no idea what the OP is even about ?

Sometimes I think people throw flags around for no valid reason whatsoever !



posted on Mar, 31 2010 @ 01:24 AM
link   
About:
Apollo Command and Service Modules

Relationship to:

4 electrons

[trying not to give it away]

[edit for being late and no contacts in]

[edit on 31-3-2010 by theability]



posted on Mar, 31 2010 @ 01:30 AM
link   
Possible answer from NASA Apollo archives...

And NASA spake, saying, "First shalt thou launch the Apollo Block II Spacecraft. Then shalt thou count to three electrons, no more, no less. Three electrons shall be the number thou shalt count, and the number of the counting shall be three. Four electrons shalt thou not count, neither count thou two, excepting that thou then proceed to three electrons. Five is right out! Once the number three, being the third number of electrons, be reached, then lobbest thou Apollo Block II Spacecraft towards thy lunar orbit, who, being naughty in my sight, shall grab unto it.



posted on Mar, 31 2010 @ 01:35 AM
link   
reply to post by Zarniwoop
 


awesome, my hat is off to you!




posted on Mar, 31 2010 @ 01:36 AM
link   
but really as I originally asked......



posted on Mar, 31 2010 @ 01:41 AM
link   
reply to post by theability
 


Read: "Apollo in Perspective: Spaceflight Then and Now" by Jonathan Allday, page 161 and 162.

The four electrons, in regards to the fuel cells, produced heat and water when combined with the electricity producing atoms in the electrolyte solution.

Pretty ingenious way of making water and heat from battery.



posted on Mar, 31 2010 @ 01:48 AM
link   
reply to post by links234
 


my reference

aoh-v1-2-06-eps.pdf

where reactants become a negative engery generator.



posted on Mar, 31 2010 @ 02:02 AM
link   
I'm afraid to reply because
A) I'm not an expert on chemistry and how they figured adding four electrons to their battery would be so beneficial and
B)I'm not sure if you're going to go on a tirade about NASA covering up 'alien' technology in the Apollo program by figuring to add four electrons to their battery for such benefits as heat and water.



posted on Mar, 31 2010 @ 02:13 AM
link   
Are we talking 4 electrons, or 4 electron volts?



posted on Mar, 31 2010 @ 10:08 AM
link   
Taken from NASA Reference: aoh-v1-2-06-eps.pdf


On Page 19 describes the concept of “Terrestrial” Technology

“Cryogenic oxygen is supplied to the power plants 900 +/- 35 psia, absorbs heat in the lines, absorbs additional heat in the preheater and reaches the oxygen regulator in gaseous form at temperatures above 100°F. The differential regulator reduces oxygen pressure to 9.5 psia above the N2 reference, thus supplying it to the fuel cell stack at 62.5 +/- 2 psia. Within the porous electrodes the O2 reacts with the H20 in the electrolyte and the electrons provided by the external circuit to produce hydroxyl ions (O2 + 2H2O + 4e = 4OH¯).

Cryogenic hydrogen, supplied to the power plants at 245 (=15, -200)psia, is heated in the same manner as the oxygen. The differential hydrogen regulator reduces the pressure to 8.5 psia above reference N2, thus supplying it in a gaseous for to the fuel cells at 61.5 +/- 2 psia. The hydrogen reacts in the porous hydrogen electrodes, water vapor, and heat
(2 H2 + 4OH¯ = 4H20 + 4e + heat) The nickel electrodes act as a catalyst in the reaction. The water vapor and heat is withdrawn by circulation of hydrogen gas in the primary loop and the electrons are supplied to the load.


[my words]
4 electrons per reaction are supplied to the load, like MAIN BUS A or MAIN BUS B.


The Apollo Command and Service Modules, relied upon 4 electrons for mission success.


[edit on 31-3-2010 been a long day already by theability]

[edit on 31-3-2010 by theability]



posted on Mar, 31 2010 @ 09:48 PM
link   
The electrons come from the ether.
Amazing.
Or a lot of things would not work.
Take radioactive emissions.
Alpha and beta rays which are particles.
See you have been lied to already by the official science.
Can yo take it.
The Alpha is a helium nucleus which will acquire electrons
and become a full fledged Helium atom.
Electrons can come from nothing or the ether.
There is more as O2 + 2H2O + 4e = 4OH¯ does look like
anti Relativism and the eternal universe.



posted on Mar, 31 2010 @ 11:36 PM
link   
Consider that light only comes from electrons being pushed around the atom.
The free electron in a vacuum only existed in your old TV tube.

What would happen if a free electron hit the free air.
Has it ever been done.
ED: An exploding star is very bright. The protons collapse as the
electron gas can no longer support the structure and electrons
are blown off.

[edit on 3/31/2010 by TeslaandLyne]



posted on Apr, 1 2010 @ 08:36 AM
link   
reply to post by TeslaandLyne
 


The Fuel cell is a Negative energy generator.

How have I been lied to by offical science?

If I can recall, in electronics they [classic theory] says you cannot have a negative energy machince.


I thought that LIGHT comes from PHOTONS emission on the near IR side of the spectrum.



[edit on 1-4-2010 by theability]



posted on Apr, 1 2010 @ 11:28 AM
link   

Originally posted by theability
reply to post by TeslaandLyne
 


The Fuel cell is a Negative energy generator.

How have I been lied to by offical science?

If I can recall, in electronics they [classic theory] says you cannot have a negative energy machince.


I thought that LIGHT comes from PHOTONS emission on the near IR side of the spectrum.



[edit on 1-4-2010 by theability]


I'm not familiar with equations that have + electrons in them.
That did look strange.
Yes there are unexplained phenomena and science uses models
and they say "do it this way".
Light is initiated in atoms by electron orbit quantum jumps.
The form of reception in the photoelectric effect which was
Einsteins biggie lent its way to the quantum photon.
If you study the reflection of light you get the EH wave theory
or perhaps the E only sound wave theory (not sure that exist
but perhaps it should).

What is interesting is that some things look counter to some
general theories. So perhaps a new general theory is needed.
Giving the ether its due would only open up a can of Tesla
technology that the cartels do not want and will not fund and
will only fund ideas that skirt the true physical universe.

ED: Check out some light bulbs. How do they work.
The filament gets hot and electrons jump out of the wire.
Called the Edison bulb and then some one put in a third wire
got some current and we got the triode vacuum tube for old
TV sets. The light perhaps is from electron quantum jumps.
For gas filled bulbs the gas is made to hold a current that moves
electrons from the gases. There are other strange lights being
created off terminals in the air with little current by high voltage
and current, mostly done by Tesla in his parlor demonstrations.
Electrons and quantum jumps are surely involved.
The filament bulb was interesting in that theory said electrons
were out of the wire.








[edit on 4/1/2010 by TeslaandLyne]



posted on Apr, 1 2010 @ 01:24 PM
link   
reply to post by TeslaandLyne
 


I will have to take a few to look at the thuings you suggested.

Be about it today.

Again though, I thought light bulbs worked by heating the filament, which then radiates heat, in the form of light.

looking into it...


As again for the negative energy fuel cell, if anyone has looked at classical electronics theory, negative energy is not an accepted version of theory.



posted on Apr, 1 2010 @ 02:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by theability
reply to post by TeslaandLyne
 


I will have to take a few to look at the thuings you suggested.

Be about it today.

Again though, I thought light bulbs worked by heating the filament, which then radiates heat, in the form of light.

looking into it...


As again for the negative energy fuel cell, if anyone has looked at classical electronics theory, negative energy is not an accepted version of theory.


Look up thermionic emission where electrons are expelled from the
heated wire. Sure the electrons give the red glow of the heat.
A filament must be of a certain type that gives off a bright light
when electrons make quantum jumps due to the heat.
ED:
www.google.com...
I have to be right on this one.
In solid state it is properly called the work function and has the
same formula but voltage is used instead of heat.
We still do not know what came out of Tesla's semi spherical
terminals at the high voltages he used.
No one will tell us.

[edit on 4/1/2010 by TeslaandLyne]



posted on Apr, 1 2010 @ 02:42 PM
link   
reply to post by TeslaandLyne
 


electrons sure have a funny way of dealing with the real world, would you agree?




new topics

top topics



 
2
<<   2 >>

log in

join