It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Obama Wants UN Sanctions on Iran..in Weeks....

page: 1
2

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 30 2010 @ 11:51 PM
link   


Obama and French President Nicolas Sarkozy presented a united front on Iran at a joint White House news conference, saying they felt it was time to move ahead with tougher sanctions that their governments have been negotiating with China, Russia, Germany and Britain.

"My hope is that we are going to get this done this spring," Obama said. "I'm interested in seeing that regime in place in weeks."


Source



And what happens after a few weeks? According to many ATS members and reports, an invasion of Iran was suppose to take place in the summer of 2008. But nothing happened.

Could this be the summer of warfare? We shall see...




posted on Mar, 30 2010 @ 11:56 PM
link   
It isn't going to happen. Eventually, they will keep going back and forth like a tennis match and then suddenly........

Iran has nukes.

Then, we sit back and consider the offers being made from other Middle East countries begging us to protect them from Iran.



posted on Mar, 31 2010 @ 12:07 AM
link   
**WARNING**

False flag eminent!

Here's what really creeped me out (from your source):



"I'm interested in seeing that regime in place in weeks."


What regime? The new one we'll install? What the heck?

I checked another source and that statement is quoted as well



posted on Mar, 31 2010 @ 12:08 AM
link   
reply to post by jam321
 


Pretty much.

It's all one giant game.

Israel makes threats.
Iran makes threats back.
United States jumps in and goes "hey Iran, calm down...btw get rid of your nukes lolz"
Iran replies with "No"
Israel becomes more paranoid and kills more Palestinians.



posted on Mar, 31 2010 @ 12:09 AM
link   
reply to post by Signals
 


good eye, I almost glossed over that statement as well. looks like a slip to me. a regime change means the one in power must be taken out. ??? guess we will see.



posted on Mar, 31 2010 @ 12:09 AM
link   

Originally posted by Signals
**WARNING**

False flag eminent!

Here's what really creeped me out (from your source):



"I'm interested in seeing that regime in place in weeks."


What regime? The new one we'll install? What the heck?

I checked another source and that statement is quoted as well



Now mind you, there is a regime in Iran, a murderous one. Protesters, students, homosexuals and beyond are executed in the country. But it isn't our business. If we want to care about human rights violations, let's look at our best friends: Saudi Arabia and Israel.



posted on Mar, 31 2010 @ 12:21 AM
link   
Couldn't he have just meant the regime of sanctions in place in weeks?

I dunno, I wouldn't go jumping to dumb conclusions such as "IMMINENT FALSE FLAG ohhhhhhh" typical ATS! haha



posted on Mar, 31 2010 @ 12:28 AM
link   

Originally posted by Nomad451
Couldn't he have just meant the regime of sanctions in place in weeks?


re·gime also ré·gime
1.
a. A form of government: a fascist regime.
b. A government in power; administration.



typical ATS! haha


Would you have it any other way?



new topics

top topics



 
2

log in

join