posted on Mar, 30 2010 @ 05:33 PM
Let me get straight to my question without any other information.
Why didn't the US government plant WMD in Iraq to prove to Americans that there were in fact WMDs there?
I think they wanted to test the public to see how we would react if so many years have passed by and so many lives lost and yet no WMD were found in
Iraq which was one of the main reasons why the Bush administration got us involved there. Possibly, the people in power wanted us to riot and
escalate things to another level so that they can declare some other law and control us even further. But, since they've realized that many people
are apathetic to the whole Iraq situation, they decide to do things right out in the open since they are aware of our "not give a damn" attitude.
What do you ladies and gentlemen of ATS think? I'm not stating that I support or even believe such thought, just putting an idea out there.