It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DINSTAAR
This is the story of mankind. Peoples lives are wasted away serving some Feudal Lord until the people cannot live under such circumstances. At which point, they revolt and put into existence another system for control. This time, the system has different goals, enemies, and leaders, but the same results are imminent.
Originally posted by DINSTAAR
Do you think the DMV would still be open if a private company offered the same services? Hell no. It only exists because competition is not allowed.
Originally posted by DINSTAAR
When repeatedly warned of the empirically proven outcomes of your actions, how can you expect to deny a reality? Lemmings
And bearing in mind that this repetition will occur again, the new system that will rise to replace this one is, in fact, the new world order that people think they are fighting against. It will most likely come through the morphing of religions as they have merged into interfaith groups and renamed themselves under various umbrellas.
Update. You can now obtain your drivers license at triple A offices.
So you have outlined much of what has been constantly repeated---reiterating the problems we all know, but still offer no solution to break the cycle. What are your ideas to side step it, Lemming?
As Alethea mentioned, you bring up a lot of the fallacies in the current system but offer no solution. It's like giving a homeless man a wall-mounted piece of art because you think it's beauty must be shared.
I don't believe a society can be sustainable. There's some strong belief in individual freedom being the be-all-end-all of societal harmony. This belief prefers to ignore failures of the system that others face, the idea that the only one who matters is the individual, society be damned.
After all...it's all about the Earth and a sustainable society that benefits the Fuedal Lords at the expense of the individual.
Then there's British Prime Minister Gordon Brown's "Green Leader", Jonathan Porritt who in order to build a sustainable society is advocating for England's population of approx. 62 million to be reduced in half by 2035-2050.
Originally posted by sarahross777
reply to post by DINSTAAR
I would venture to guess that Karl henrich Marx and his Marxist PROGRESSIVE sociopolitical ideas were known to both Stalin and Mao Tse Tung, just as these same ideas as known to today's American President and his administration.
It is being said that the conservative segment of the American populace is so disappointed in the left's ability to respect the Constitution, that when given a Presidential candidate for the 2012 elestion who is the literal antithesis of Obama and his minions [a "trusted" individual from the ranks of the military, Petraeus?], they jump at the chance an install a personality who is even more dictatorial than Obama.
...the Georgia Guidestones display for all who can read (in several languages) that the goal of the NWO is to reduce the Earth's population from 6.7 billion to 500,000,000 over the next 5-10 years.
Egalitarian ideas, when implemented by force of government, do not work and lead to great human atrocities. The idea that 'society' is damned if the individual is empowered is propaganda of the highest order. To focus on society as a whole is to dehumanize the people and marginalize morals in favor of some 'greater good' methodology that is just poorly disguised tyranny. I hope your children like MARCHING
I daresay your whole point in writing this is to espouse some great ideal in individual freedoms, which you've yet to mention directly, only to chastise any idea of progress of society.
Let me tell you now, freedom for one does NOT equate to freedom for all.
So the idea of slavery and women not voting is ok with you?
Those are rather egalitarian ideas.
Even the concept the United States is built upon is egalitarian, are you advocating the abolishment of the constitution and the bill of rights because it's words are too egalitarian?