It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
[
LeBron James just said he prayed to our 'Lord and Savior Jesus Christ' for Rodney Stuckey, after a reporter noted that James called the players together in a prayer circle after Stuckey suffered an apparent seizure and was taken to Cleveland Clinic Hospital.
Originally posted by randyvs
HE'S INDESTRUCTABLE
HE'S JESUS CHRIST
In him I can be found worthy.
Thank you for that OT, quite a lift indeed.
I love how you seem to come from nowhere sometimes.
Originally posted by blupblup
reply to post by OldThinker
I do admit....
I did actually really like "The passion of the Christ"
Originally posted by CHA0S
I have no king...nearly no one on this planet truly understands what freedom and independence means, whilst claiming to be free, yet not grasping the true depth of their enslavery...you're all mindless robots waiting for your next commands..
Originally posted by Matthew Dark
Originally posted by CHA0S
I have no king...nearly no one on this planet truly understands what freedom and independence means, whilst claiming to be free, yet not grasping the true depth of their enslavery...you're all mindless robots waiting for your next commands..
Well said, that's pretty much what I was thinking as well.
The concept of Jesus is designed to create a perfect person that no one can possibly live up to.
It's as though we're taught that we're doomed from the very beginning.
I'm going to have to just say NO.
Originally posted by ImaginaryReality1984
Originally posted by OldThinker
Originally posted by Reign02
.....There is nothing to prove that he was infact the son of god. ....
I always found the empty tomb interesting...especially since the Roman guards would loose their life should something happen to the grave....
And it did
It would mean a great deal if any recognised historian had encountered the tomb. Indeed how do you excuse the complete lack of historical accounts of Christ? I mean seriously if a guy was walking around performing such amazing miricles then don't you think that every historian would have picked up on that? Why is it that only one historian, who is at best questionable, mentioned Jesus?
Originally posted by wylekat
This is my last post in here. *hears cheering from the fundies* So far, I have watched you self righteous trolls slap each other on the back and sniff each others butts, while avoiding any real criticism either by posting nonsense sprinkled liberally with scriptures, or just ignoring the actual criticisms wholesale and outright. NOT ONCE have I seen even a ' Y'know, maybe we DO need to look at our religion as a whole, since it is doing (insert stuff here)". Others act like they are the end all of Christianity, and so are so full of themselves, that if they backed into a cactus, they'd pop.
I am not so sure about anyone else, but I always feel I and anyone who so much as thinks about criticizing these people on their actual and real Religious shortcomings end up on the crummy end of the stick- abused, laughed at, and completely ignored. Ya know something? It's your house. Your house is on fire, and it's sinking into the ground. You cant hear the screams of people to 'get out!', because you've got your fingers in your ears and singing 'lalalalala'- It's your problem. It's not mine- I already left the burning house, and I'm still tending to the scorch marks. Happy destruction!
Fools.
Originally posted by OldThinker
Romans 3:23
Romans 6:23
Romans 8:1
Ephesians 2: 8, 9
I hope you re-consider your answer .... so glad you took the time to share your thoughts....thx!
no no no, You have it all wrong. All I am saying is that The universe was created.Think about it. Matter can not create matter PERIOD!!!.Something, (God) or some one,(GOD) is the answer that science can not give to this question. It has nothing to do with good and evil or what is written in a book.(although the bible seems to have nailed this theory spot on) Evolution is not even in the equation.Do you honestly believe that there is no concrete theory that backs this up? You are the one who is kidding yourself. Isn't that what science is,... theory?
Originally posted by jinx880101
reply to post by oliveoil
Naa sayers, Religion answers the two most important questions that science can never answer. -By whom the universe was made. - and for what purpose. how can we know how to use anything correctly if we dont know what its purpose is?
You must be kidding me... please tell me this is a joke.
Why does it have to be 'whom', why does it have to be someone? Because the Bible says so?
What purpose does the Bible give? For a so called 'God' to have servants to worship 'him' and who will bow down to him... & if they do not, they will succumb to eternal damnation in hell.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If 'God' really gave me a choice or so called 'free will', I would rather he did not create me. Because I need more than a human written book full of threats to keep me in line to believe in an all mighty all loving God.
The way I see it, God would not want me to believe with blind faith. And if he wanted me to believe in him, he would show me why.
I'm sorry, but I will not be a pawn in the power struggle between God and Satan (if they even exist in the way the bible portrays them) - who are competing for the most followers.
If the cost is eternal damnation, then so be it. But somehow, I don't think things will turn out that way.
Originally posted by trueperspective
Originally posted by Titen-Sxull
reply to post by HIWATT
Christianity and Science are not at odds. One is based on faith and one on evidence. Faith is not permitted in science, claims must be tested time and time again and go through grueling peer reviews before they are finally accepted as true.
LOL, will never stop laughing at this claim. As I stated in another thread
Well actually you are wrong. Evolution is NOT in any sense of the word based on empirical evidence, or tested experimentation.
1) No man has ever seen one "family" of animal evolve into another "family" of animal. Like say a duck into a lizard.
2) As far as I know time travel doesn't exist, So no man has experienced the past empirically. So everything we have as "evidence" must be examined and interpreted as to it's historical context.
3) Again, no man saw the beginning of the Universe, So there will never be empirical evidence about it's origin.
So NO, science about origins is NOT based on empirical evidence. It is based on faith.
Science is one of the biggest faith based organizations I know!! While at the same time being the most hypocritical about it. It is the most amazing act of blind hypocrisy the world has ever seen.