It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jprophet420
who thinks WTC7 was brought down due to office fires?
Also WHY you believe what you believe would be nice.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
This shows details that are usually omitted by the 'conspiracy' web sites and advocates:
www.debunking911.com...
Good stuff to look through.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
It was NOT just from the fires, you know.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
There was substantial damage inflicted, structurally, as well.
“while debris impact from the collapse of WTC 1 initiated fires in WTC 7, the resulting structural damage had little effect in causing the collapse of WTC 7.”
What's an office fire? Is that different from other kind of fire? Can you swim in it? Does it match the drapes?
This shows details that are usually omitted by the 'conspiracy' web sites and advocates:
Lets see -any of my FF friends were across the street at World Financial
Center 3 (WFC 3) - fighting fires started there by debris from WTC 1.
None of them witnessed any mysterious ninjas planting explosives
to bring building down or Silverstein ranting in the street "to just pull it"
Have to go with office fires .....
Yeah, fires did it.
I used to think that it was a combo of the fires and the damage, but then I actually read the report:
wtc.nist.gov...
I assumed that they didn't have enough info to determine the cause, but I shouldn't have made that assumption before reading the report. I advise that all "truthers" also read the report before criticizing it.
Originally posted by jprophet420
Just a quick show of hands, who thinks WTC7 was brought down due to office fires?
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Too bad such a phrasing ignores the massive amount of damage done to the building.
Other than initiating the fires in WTC 7, the damage from the debris from WTC 1 had little effect on initiating the collapse of WTC 7.
Even without the structural damage, WTC 7 would have collapsed from fires having the same characteristics as those experienced on September 11, 2001.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by weedwhacker
This shows details that are usually omitted by the 'conspiracy' web sites and advocates:
www.debunking911.com...
Good stuff to look through.
You can make that page 10 times longer with more drivel, but it will never explain this:
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/a39ae149b0f6.gif[/atsimg]
You will never get a steel-structured highrise to fall evenly and completely from fires. If you think you can, you should be advised that you can become a very rich person by doing so.