It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Large Hadron Collider to start high energy 'God Particle' hunt

page: 2
4
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 30 2010 @ 05:07 AM
link   
So, they turn on the Large Hadron Collider again and only hours later part of the ceiling of Nero palace collapses!


ROME — Italian news reports say that part of the ceiling of Nero's Golden Palace in Rome has collapsed.

There were no early reports of injured people after the collapse Tuesday morning, according to the ANSA and Apcom news agencies.

Built by Roman emperor Nero in the first century A.D., the sumptuous palace is known to many by its Latin name Domus Aurea.

Source: AP

Coincidence? I think not.


[edit on 30/3/2010 by FreezeM]




posted on Mar, 30 2010 @ 05:09 AM
link   
Why won't anyone answer my question, jesus the son of marry, someone answer my god damn question.



posted on Mar, 30 2010 @ 05:11 AM
link   
reply to post by FreezeM
 


I would put that in the coincidence category since they are just barely ramping it up and have yet to collide particles. Even right now it's only at 1.65 TeV as I type this; they plan on colliding the particles at 7 TeV. So, I don't see how it could possibly be related.



posted on Mar, 30 2010 @ 05:18 AM
link   
reply to post by Pimpish
 


Did you notice the little smiley face? It looks like this:


But maybe I should clarify myself. No, I do not really think Nero's palace collapsed because of the Hadron Collider. I was trying to be funny. Clearly I failed.



posted on Mar, 30 2010 @ 05:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by oozyism
reply to post by jcrash
 


How the hell does this experiment mimics the early stages of the Bigbang? Some one explain please.. Colliding particles at high speed is not the same as an outward burst which what the BigBang really was. Or Am I Confusing MySelf..

Help all you brave scientific minds.


Hiya,

The LHC can at full power collide particles at 14tev, 7 tev in one direction and 7 tev in the other. These types of energies were only present in the big bang as far as we know and if you subscribe to the big bang theory.

This is not actually recreating the big bang but just making conditions where energies were similar.

I personally do not subscribe to the Big Bang Theory, there are way too many holes with additional maths to cover them, such as the concept of inflation and accelerating expansion.

Physics unfortunately is field where law is passed by consensus. So only the theories that are not considered crackpot are validated later on by clever maths.

There are some really interesting results from labs that when they attempt to publish are slammed by the institution and then the scientists involved gain a way out there rep.

This in my mind hampers progress and is why we keep up with experimentation to validate the Standard Model.

Einstein himself knew that there was something wrong, and he had started a quest to unify physics (a theory of everything) but unfortunately died before he had any real answers.

I hope this has answered your question, though please do ask if there is anything else you don't understand and I will see if I can help.

And to the person who stated stop calling it the 'GOD' particle ----> RIGHT ON BUDDY!!!

The Higgs Boson is the correct name and calling it the GOD particle is purely down to the fact that it is this particle that if exists explains how matter gains mass, and as such tracking back to the early universe could explain how matter clumped together to create the first stars.... track that forwards and you have a particle that is responsible for all life.

The Higgs however has nothing to do with Consciousness or a super natural intelligence.

Though as I stated earlier IMHO they won't find anything, and if they announced they did I will be trawling their results as I won't believe it until I see it.

All the best,

Korg.



posted on Mar, 30 2010 @ 05:30 AM
link   
reply to post by FreezeM
 


My mistake, hard to interpret text sometimes. Yes, I did see the smiley face but people overuse them so much that I usually tend to just ignore them.



posted on Mar, 30 2010 @ 05:34 AM
link   
reply to post by Korg Trinity
 


You are the friken man, thanks heaps..

ooz



posted on Mar, 30 2010 @ 08:55 AM
link   
And we are still here ,go figure .lol Thats not its full potential, but I think we will be ok . No black holes devastating earth anytime soon . Rest easy ATS.

[edit on 30-3-2010 by paradiselost333]



posted on Mar, 30 2010 @ 09:08 AM
link   
Wouldn't it be totally bonkers if whilst we are discussing the LHC in all its glory, the people that made designed it and made were carrying out some master plan in order to create some ridiculously futuristic weapon from it.

Wouldn't that be crazy.



posted on Mar, 30 2010 @ 10:49 AM
link   
reply to post by FreezeM
 



Logic fallacy - two things happen closely in time therefore they must be related.



posted on Mar, 30 2010 @ 10:58 AM
link   

Originally posted by Aeons
reply to post by FreezeM
 



Logic fallacy - two things happen closely in time therefore they must be related.


It's not illogical at all, have you ever heard of chaos thoery??

2nd line to appease the ats staffs lol ;p

All the best,

Korg.



posted on Mar, 30 2010 @ 12:36 PM
link   
reply to post by oozyism
 


Way to drift the thread, people... Like I said in the OP, Hadron is pure bunk just Climate change and swine flu. No matter how many pages of scientific babble are devoted to it.



posted on Mar, 31 2010 @ 02:53 AM
link   

Originally posted by jcrash
reply to post by oozyism
 


Way to drift the thread, people... Like I said in the OP, Hadron is pure bunk just Climate change and swine flu. No matter how many pages of scientific babble are devoted to it.


Pure bunk ? Kinda like your post?
Care to prove why the LHC is bunk?
(btw ....keep calling it hadron.... :@@


Seriously, you're making a joke out of yourself,
ridiculing and dismissing things you can't even begin to understand,
without any reasoning or proof. I wonder what drives you to do this...

Deny ignorance...yeah



posted on Mar, 31 2010 @ 07:40 AM
link   

Originally posted by jcrash
reply to post by oozyism
 


Way to drift the thread, people... Like I said in the OP, Hadron is pure bunk just Climate change and swine flu. No matter how many pages of scientific babble are devoted to it.


Climate change is a fact, it's been happening ever since the earth first developed a climate to change... However the carbon tax and stupendous schemes set up to so called combat change is a scam...

Swine Flue is also a scam, designed to boost the pharmaceuticals industries and to ever tighten control over the populace..

The LHC is NOT a scam or is it designed to do anything other than smash particles together.... I'm sure some may think that the amount of money spend in building it and the choice of contractors could be considered a scam but and I repeat but this does not mean the LHC is as you put it is BUNK.

Try reading some books on physics before posting threads about a subject you obviously posses no knowledge in.

Peace Out,

Korg.



posted on Mar, 31 2010 @ 10:13 AM
link   
The truth is scientist can't accept what science tells us.

Science tells us that there is no objective reality. Reality is a construct of the mind.

When you eat food, the mind tells you how food should taste based on the smell of the food. This is why everything taste the same when you have a cold and a stuffy nose.

When you touch a hard table or a soft pillow, you never really "touch" it. The electrons from your hand repels against the electrons in the table and the mind perceives a hard table or a soft pillow.

Many scientist are materialist and they have been trying to explain for years through things like the Higgs Boson and other theories, why the universe doesn't seem real outside of our perception of it.

The Unified Field Theory of Consciousness explains that everything is a construct of the Mind instead of unconscious, dead matter magically and accidentally becoming aware of itself.

[edit on 31-3-2010 by Matrix Rising]



posted on Mar, 31 2010 @ 04:14 PM
link   
reply to post by Matrix Rising
 


Science does not tell us that there is no objective reality. Certain metaphysical and epistemological theories tell us that there is no objective reality. Do your research before making wild allegations.



new topics

top topics



 
4
<< 1   >>

log in

join