Here we go
reply to
post by polarwarrior
The video linked there showed many artifacts glowing when under "black" light (violet and ultraviolet light), it in fact emphasized on each and
every artifact that did so. Now I wonder, if I can present him with some of my ancient artifacts that glow under a black light will he be equally
impressed? All of my white clothes (yes, underwear included
) glow brightly under black light, teeth enamel glows brightly under black light. So,
are my white shirts/socks and teeth peculiar ancient artifacts of some increased significance? they DO glow under black light (which seemed to be the
most notable trait of many artifacts in the first of 5 video segments - I watched it in youtube, thanks to the one who posted the link!!)
reply to post by franspeakfree
Yes, it shows what scientists MAY know (or think they know). It cannot show what scientists WILL know though as it presented not enough evidence, in
fact it presented only possibilities, most of the time weak ones. Factual evidence is the artifacts themselves, if real, yet they alone cannot help us
solve this mystery (or "mystery"). More research is needed before said possibilities are proven to hold enough water to be promoted to accepted
theories (let's face it, those that condemn "accepted" or mainstream science are the ones that burn with the desire of being a part of what's
"accepted", no?).
About the universal language, I believe we had at least 2 universal (or almost universal) languages in our past. One, when humans were "confined" in
Africa and numbering small populations (some thousands). This has to be dated way back, before the proposed date for the 'out of Africa' movement
(circa 80,000 years ago). Another universal language must have been used around 74,000 years ago, when Toba erupted and bottlenecked our population,
outside Africa this time, to a few thousand, if that. In both cases, the common denominator is small numbers and a relatively small expansion, space
wise. There is no real proof of a universal language in use about 6,000-10,000 years ago, all we have is some matching letters (and we're not sure if
they translate the same way when they come from different origins). Until such proof emerges, the universal language will remain love and music
reply to
post by jumpingbeanz
One source of material that glows when under violet/ultraviolet light is enamel. wherever you have a good supply of healthy teeth (not just human
teeth!), you can grind down the enamel to a fine dust, mix with some solvant agent to create some kind of "putty" and paint away
Zatara:
The forgers are using materials from the age the object suppose to be and it is made how an ancient craftsworker would make it.
I think you will have to explain to all the ET advocates how on earth can humans replicate what aliens did in the first place. If humans couldn't do
it then and it is "almost impossible" to do it now, how can these replicators do it using methods and tools the ancient people used? This of course
does not go for ALL replicated artifacts around but if even one that's attributed to aliens can be replicated using ancient tools and methods by
today's humans the whole alien hypothesis is beginning to shake a bit, no?
Titen-Sxull:
Thank God you said it before I had to
ColeYounger:
OP...your thread is most interesting. I'm so jaded though, I would need proof
the artifacts aren't fake.
They don't have to be fake, just misidentified will do.
Zeta Reticuli:
None of this stuff seems crazy if you are a firm believer of time travel. It took alot to get me to believe, even though i have always wanted to
believe, but to hear (and read) about its acheivment by the US gov. was a huge change in course for me.
Now when i read about this type of stuff i cant help but think its the time travlers who are sending us hints (or having fun with us, really). Like
the small rolex watch just found in a ming dynasty tomb, its almost as if someone went into the future and back into time, placed it in the tomb, and
back to the present to see the ppls reaction.
i know i would if i had the capability
What stops you from traveling through time, since you so firmly believe in it? Isn't that enough?
Where it is said that the US govt achieved time travel?
I strongly second your signature!
akuarii47:
so does this mean that the illuminati go back into prehistoric times...waaayyy before the egyptians???
Way back, before the Earth itself, they are the ones that created it!
gLuEBoY:
Put a Battery in the Sarcophagus.....
Thats what i was told .. This is going to turn on a Stargate ( IMO ).. Or , Its goijng to turn on something else..
More probably it will activate a black hole that will eat us all up - don't do that!
TheWalkingFox:
If that is so, did the Egyptians built Gobekli Tepe?
warpcrafter:
That ancient skull with the skin and hair needs to be extensively tested. That way, we may be able to figure out which of our genes are hominid and
which are Anunnaki.
how do we decide which parts are Annunaki? and, please, define "hominid" (when it comes to DNA we don't have such an extensive archive of all
hominid species that walked the Earth through time, even bones are scarce!)
colin42:
I am not the on worried about the pyramids reported to exist in china that locals say were built by blonde haired blue eyed people, the Chinese gov.
is.
You mean to tell us the Nazis built a pyramid in China? Wow, I didn't know that!
Before I run out of characters, let me address the one out of place artifact that, for me, is the most intriguing. The Piri Reis map. It is dated to
about 1528 (IIRC) and it depicts the shores of south America with astounding accuracy. To do that, you need not only a dependable method of
determining your longtitude, aside from your latitude which is relatively easier. Longtitude measurement requires chronometry, devices that can
accurately and dependably measure time and such devices were not "portable" upon ships at that time!!
[edit on 30-3-2010 by Maegnas]