Shiva IS NOT Enlil. He does match much more with POSEIDON, and Poseidon was DEFINITELY Enki. Not only american investigators but french and spanish
are getting the same conclusions; ENLIL DOESN'T APPEAR AT ALL AT HINDU MITHOLOGY. Because, think a little bit, why in the world among SO MANY
ancient cultures like the Egyptian (cruelly distroyed by Enlil) Hindu culture and its Gods STILL ALIVE and are worshipped??? If Enlil had have the
littlest to do with it, believe me, Christianism would have DISTROYED hinduism, like it did with so many politheistic cultures, because Enlil wanted
to be THE ONLY ONE. Hinduism is one of the few evidendeces and legacies that Enki hat left to us. Please don't think that easy; "because they are
three, Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva they have to match by force with the crazy christian trinity". Not in all the hindu mithology there is a "trinity";
check the differences between Mithos; in one Mytho Shiva is the spouse of Parvati, who emanates Durga; and in another one he is not her spouse at all,
but Durga's, an hibrid produced by the mix from the powers of the Gods. In some regions of India Shiva is Vishnu's brother, but in other one, he is
Vishnu's son, so there isn't always a trinity. And look at the character of Shiva; he is totally unattached in all of the mithos, yes, he gets
angry, just like Vishnu's encarnation, Rama, who DISTROYED Atlantis and flooded the whole Earth!! RAMA IS VISHNU... is Vishu because of that Enlil???
All of the ancient "gods" are passionated, that Shiva was passionated doesn't make him automatically to Enlil; he even didn't care if he was adored or
not; IN ANY OF THE MITHS; and that, my friend, is a characteristic that Enlil DEFINITELY didn't have, because HE LOVED to be adored and praised and
worshipped. The sentence about "the purest one", is only ONCE SENTENCE AMONG MILLIONS OF SENTENCES that one can find in hindu scriptures, and not
only on the surface, but in a deeper studium. Shiva was COVERED WITH ASHES, and even Daksha, Sati's father thought Shiva was DIRTY, disgusting and
unworthy to having married Sati (previous incarnation of Parvati). But that DIDN'T BOTHER SHIVA. Do you think Enlil would have reacted the same way??
Shiva could live a lot of time knowing what for an opinion his father in law had, but when Sati commit suicide because of one disnhonouring thing that
Daksha and his guests in a Yagna did to both of them, then, the Shiva who has remained peaceful let his army destroy the palast and kill Daksha, but
then, after calmin himself, Shiva, who still was suffering because of the lost of his beloved Sati, REVIVED all of the people that he had killed, even
Daksha and forgave all of them. After that, Shiva didn't want to know anything more from the world, and went into a cave and he remained there with
his suffering and meditating during lots and lots of years. Hundreds of years, indeed. Till the gods, worried for Shiva, thought about Sati being
reincarnated again as Parvati and they had the idea that she should marry him.
Is Enlil really like Shiva? Would Enlil forgive all of them who were responsible for his wife's death and even revived them? Would he really really
give up the world in order to go in a cave to practice PENANCE during hundreds of years and trying to forget and dominate his emotions?? Honestly, I
DON'T THINK SO. The Enlil that I know, would have done exactly the same as RAMA, he had overflowed the Earth and killed millions of innocent people,
it doesn't matter if he had right or not. But anyway, even Rama is seen as a very, very important Deity, to whom everybody bow, end even Hanuman
serves with all of his heart.... Like I said, lots of investigators in other languages are getting the conclusions that Enlil didn't play any
important role on the foundation of the Indian civilization.
edit on 10-7-2015 by Radha because: (no reason given)