Were the Anunnaki alien race, the same hindu gods???

page: 1
37
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
+15 more 
posted on Mar, 29 2010 @ 06:09 AM
link   
In modern times, the main reference we have to learn about the supposed alien race that has colonized Earth, in remote times, are the books of Zecharia Sitchin, like it or not. Debunkers, "in the box" scholars and general skeptics claim he misinterpreted Sumerians tablets and ancient Mesopotamian scriptures, that alien colonization never happened and the Anunnaki are just myths. Well it seems that the Sumerians weren't the only source of information about these extraterrestrial humanoids. They were reported by many ancient civilizations, as the Greeks, Romans, Meso-americans... but the scriptures of ancient Hindu civilization, seem to have massive information about them, during the times it was knew as "Rama Empire".
Comparing texts from the Ayurveda scriptures with the translations of Zecharia Sitchin, we can see a very strong similarity between the Sumerian gods and the Hindu gods. Personalities, behaviors, doctrines, passions, wars, technologies, architectures and many events that suggest the ancient Hindus weren't talking about mythic creatures or fantasy deities, but real beings, super humanoids coming from stars and their interaction with mankind. Before start expose my point here, I wanna let clear, I won't elaborate about the spiritual and religious implications of the Anunnaki presence in the Hindu civilizations. It's more like an anthropological approach.
The meaning of the word "Ayurveda" itself, already give us a clue about them: Ayur means "life" and Veda means "science." The ancient Hindu "gods", the so called "Vedas", were scientists, actually. Bearers of high advanced knowledge about material sciences and occult sciences. So you ask - "What the Anunnaki have to do with hindu gods?"
According to Zecharia Sitchin, when the Anunnaki returned to Earth after the last ice age, they decided to create realms and split among them. Most of them were built in Egypt, around the Persian Gulf and Mediterranean. But ENLIL, the first on command, decided to give the area of the Indus Valley, to his grand-daughter, INANNA.



Inanna "liked to roam the lands and took a liking to the people who in the upper plain of the two rivers dwelt. They were the IGIGI who descended to Earth from heaven, from Lahmu (Mars). The Igigi Aryans moved east, following Inanna (they called her Ishtar) to the Indus Valley region (Aratta) and laid the foundation for the Indo-European culture."
[Tellinger, M., 2006, Slave Species of god, page 499]


According to Michael Tellinger, another researcher of Sumerian Culture, the princess Inanna moved with a team of IGIGI, "astronauts", to raise a civilization in the plains of the Indus Valley. The word "Aryan" seems to come from the combination "Ayur", life + "An", sky, space. "Those who live in the space". Later this word became a general label to define the descendants of the crossbreeding between the Anunnaki and the humans of that region.



Notice the painting above, some kind of festival where ancient Hindus are worshiping giant humanoids. Notice a discoid UFO above the scene.



Curiously both Sumerians and Hindu ever depicted their "gods" taming lions.



Above you see the warrior princess INANNA, that supposedly raised the Hindu civilization helped by the IGIGI. Inanna's personality totally matches with the Goddess Kali and it's just weird that in some artistic depictions or sculptures of Kali, her face is just identical to Sumerians steles.



In most of Hindu paintings, Kali is bearing several weapons and fighting enemies, as the Sumerians depicted Inanna, but sometimes she's identified as Sarasvati in her sexy aspect.



Notice the pic above, a descendant from the original Aryan ethnic group, caught in Afghanistan. The modern dark skinned Hindu ethnic group, seems to be result of crossbreeding with Mesopotamian and African groups.

Also we can find many similarities between other Sumerian and Hindu gods. Lets check their sacred triad:



The so called "Trimurti", the sacred Hindu triad formed by Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva is identical to Sumerian Anunnaki triad ANU, ENKI and ENLIL. Brahma, the "grandfather", is the god who "rules from the sky", Vishnu is the "creator", the "preserver", the "life engineer" and Shiva is the "destroyer".

Notice that Vishnu's characteristics are identical of the Sumerian god Enki, the great Anunnaki genetic engineer. In the Mahabharata is mentioned he created men and the "nagas", serpent beings that looks more like reptile humanoids and also the "danavas", giant humanoids very similar to the "Nephilim".





Above, Lord Ganesha, the humanoid god with an elephant like head. Another creation of Enki's genetic engineering???

Shiva matches too much with Enlil. In Sanskrit literature he's depicted as "the One who is eternally pure" or "the One who can never have any contamination of the imperfection of Rajas and Tamas". Enlil was the Anunnaki that hated the crossbreeding between his race and the humans. Shiva is the most feared god of Hindu cosmogony. He's the one that destroyed the "three cities of Asura demons", that totally looks like Sodom, Gomorrah and the Babel Tower. He's the god that provide powerful weapons to other gods and warriors. The Asuras are similar to the rebel Anunnaki that matched with human females.



[edit on 29-3-2010 by ucalien]




posted on Mar, 29 2010 @ 06:10 AM
link   
Below, the goddess Durga, the "divine mother of the gods", "the one who has the divine power of creation". She seems identical to Sumerian goddess NIMAH".



According to Sitchin, NIMAH aka NINHARSAG was the Anunnaki genetic engineer that worked in the "Adapa project" with Enki. She's very worshiped in India as the "great protector of men".

Notice how some symbols of Hindu occultist doctrines are related to Mesopotamian archetypes:


Above, a scheme of vedic symbols related to engineering of the physical and ethereal body, disclosing the points of energy flow, vortexes known as "Chakras" where each vortex is associated with a specific element. Notice the symbol of sexual chakra, the most powerful vortex of human body, is a pyramid. It's associated to fire element. It seems that pyramids aren't only related to Anunnaki architecture, but also with occultist science.
Other ancient Hindu very known symbol, is the swastika, that originally represents life flow, life cycle, life preservation and was inverted to be used as an evil archetype by the nazis.


Original Hindu swastika





The swastika ALSO is found in some ancient Mesopotamian and Greek-roman buildings, attributed to the Anunnaki.



Particularly interesting is that the swastika is seen along the extension of some sections of the Baalbek terrace that, according to Sitchin, was a landpad platform.





It seems that the roots of myths about the "Aryan superior race" and the nazi misinterpretation of the swastika, are related to the wars of a very racist Anunnaki humanoid named Indra, against the "Dravidians" or "Dasyus", that seemed to be dark skinned Nefilins crossbreeding of Mesopotamians and Africans.



"Indra, the slayer of Vrittra, the destroyer of cities, has scattered the Dasyu (hosts) sprang from a black womb." RgV. II 20.6

The Rig Veda praises the god who "destroyed the Dasyans and protected the Aryan colour." - Rg.V. III 34.9


Another very important aspect of similarity between the Sumerian and Hindu gods, is the architecture. Despite the Anunnaki didn't build pyramids in India (but built in China), the characteristic megalithic edifices, assembled with mega blocks cut with surgical precision or straightly carved in mountains.





Above, a Hindu temple that strongly suggests some spacecraft launching platform. The shape of the main building is very common in many temples over the India and is identical to schemes of Vimana crafts, depicted in the Samarangana Sutradhara, an encyclopedic work on classical Indian architecture and engineering (Vastu Shastra) written by Paramara King Bhoja of Dhar (1000-1055 AD).



"Shining in every direction, their machine (yantra) could travel wherever the imagination dictated. From their great height they saw stimulating dances, drama plays, and pristine dance ceremonies. Their yantra gained renown among Royal dynasties and various nations. In such a manner the High-Souled ones flew, while the lower classes walked. All those friends succeeded in their much-deserved acquisition of a yantra, by means of which human beings can fly in the air, and non-earthling, Celestial Beings, can come down to mortals in their visits to Earth."

"An extremely swift and nimble vimana can be built, as large as the temple of the God-in-motion. Into the interior structure four strong mercury containers must be installed. When these have been heated by a controlled fire from iron containers, the flying machine develops thunder-power through the mercury, becoming a highly desirable yantra. Moreover, if this iron engine with properly welded joints be filled with fluid [mercury?], when ascending or descending over land it generates power with the roar of a lion.
Chapter XXXI






These Vimana aircrafts seem to be the same vehicles reported by Sumerians, the DIN.GIR, piloted by the Anunnaki.



And the model of Vimana below seems to be the same flying object seen by Sumerians and Babylonians as the Anunnaki aircraft depicted as the "winged disk".





As you see, there are too many coincidences that can't be ignored. Different cultures that corroborates the translations of Zecharia Sitchin. Like it or not. A bit of scrutiny over these similarities and many secrets are revealed.
So if you have any ideas, bring it on!


[edit on 29-3-2010 by ucalien]



posted on Mar, 29 2010 @ 06:34 AM
link   
reply to post by ucalien
 



Originally posted by ucalien
Below, the goddess Durga, the "divine mother of the gods", "the one who has the divine power of creation". She seems identical to Sumerian goddess NIMAH".


How are they similar? Because they're both female? If it's because they both have the 'power of creation' then with that rationale you could say that Durga is the same as the Virgin Mary.


Originally posted by ucalien




Particularly interesting is that the swastika is seen along the extension of some sections of the Baalbek terrace...



Now that is very interesting.



Originally posted by ucalien

Another very important aspect of similarity between the Sumerian and Hindu gods, is the architecture. Despite the Anunnaki didn't build pyramids in India (but built in China), the characteristic megalithic edifices, assembled with mega blocks cut with surgical precision or straightly carved in mountains.





There's been enough research done on Petra to show how it was built. There is proof for example, in the walls rising up which show evidence of wooden planks used as scaling in order to build/carve the structure from top to bottom. The same method was probably used in India. They were carved from top to bottom using wooden scaffolds. I think there's a Discovery channel program about Petra, worth a watch, it has plenty of detail.


No alien intervention there.


Originally posted by ucalien

As you see, there are too many coincidences that can't be ignored. Different cultures that corroborates the translations of Zecharia Sitchin. Like it or not.




What evidence is actually corroborating here? Genetic bloodlines based on what, a TIME magazine cover? Alien laser technology based on what, the fact that you are unaware of how the building was actually built?. My suggestion is to put your efforts into comparative mythology without the works of Sitchin breathing down your back...


You've presented some interesting points though, thanks for the read.



posted on Mar, 29 2010 @ 06:37 AM
link   
reply to post by ucalien
 


Of course Hindu origins come from the stars - what else could it be?
Do you believe this to be true also?



posted on Mar, 29 2010 @ 06:46 AM
link   
reply to post by serbsta
 




How are they similar? Because they're both female? If it's because they both have the 'power of creation' then with that rationale you could say that Durga is the same as the Virgin Mary.


Ain't comparing Durga with Virgin Mary. Durga is a GODDESS. Ninharsag is a GODDESS. Mary was a human woman.



posted on Mar, 29 2010 @ 06:51 AM
link   
reply to post by serbsta
 




They were carved from top to bottom using wooden scaffolds. I think there's a Discovery channel program about Petra, worth a watch, it has plenty of detail.


Are you serious???? Petra was build with wooden scaffolds"???? Don't make me laugh. NONE ancient civilization had technology to make laser-like cuts in massive rocks. It's the same IDIOT idea that Giza Pyramids were built by slaves, dragging stone blocks through the desert and assembling them with vine ropes, bamboo cranes and wood scaffoldings. It's pathetic.



posted on Mar, 29 2010 @ 06:52 AM
link   
Great and very informative post! S&F

I believe you are on to something here...
too many similarities for this being coincidence.

Thx



posted on Mar, 29 2010 @ 06:54 AM
link   
reply to post by serbsta
 




My suggestion is to put your efforts into comparative mythology without the works of Sitchin breathing down your back...


Sitchin is a good reference TO ME. If YOU don't like of his work, is YOUR problem.



posted on Mar, 29 2010 @ 06:56 AM
link   
reply to post by zoomer72
 

It's just a small scratch on the surface. But there's no doubt they are too similar. People that use to bash Zecharia Sitchin, ignore that NOT ONLY the Sumerians reported the Anunnaki.



posted on Mar, 29 2010 @ 06:59 AM
link   
reply to post by ucalien
 


There is archaeological proof in regards to who built the Gizamids. Tombs of the workers have been discovered in close vicinity of the complex, carvings speaking of worker gangs have been discovered, etc. Do you simply just choose to ignore this evidence?

In regards to the Kazneh, the building in Petra which you think was laser carved by aliens. See this image:

www.bibleplaces.com...

You see the rows of indents on either side of the structure? This is where some form of scaffolding was held in place as they descended downward and continued carving. As they went down, so did their scaffold, its a simple process really, but I'm sure the master craftsmen who were involved took a really long time to carve this gem.

You really don't give human ingenuity too much credit.



[edit on 29/3/2010 by serbsta]



posted on Mar, 29 2010 @ 07:01 AM
link   
Intresting, but I feel like putting this forth.
It is a youtube series of 13 parts.



Now, this YT is intresting to say the least, it is Not about the Anunnaki, but Enlil and those figures are in here, realy an Must See, im not claiming it to be true, but the man who made the Vid has based it on a book from an former ATS member's book called New World Bible and should be watched.

Found another one : New World Bible - The Story of the Truth
By Brendan Levon..


They act like they dont know why Neanderthal man died off, or what the riddle of the sphinx actually is. If thats the case, then the author of these books is one of the smartest people to ever walk the face of the earth because all the worlds mysteries arent mysteries once you apply them to their forbidden calendar. It is time to start waking people up, they didnt kill our ancestors for no reason.


[edit on 29/3/2010 by ChemBreather]



posted on Mar, 29 2010 @ 07:32 AM
link   
reply to post by serbsta
 

You has failed AGAIN 'cos your lack of knowledge doesn't observe that many modern scholars already admitted that NO slaves were involved with the building of the pyramids.



Dieter Wildung, a former director of Berlin's Egyptian Museum, said it is "common knowledge in serious Egyptology" that the pyramid builders were not slaves and that the construction of the pyramids and the story of the Israelites in Egypt were separated by hundreds of years. "The myth of the slaves building pyramids is only the stuff of tabloids and Hollywood," Wildung told The Associated Press by telephone. "The world simply could not believe the pyramids were build without oppression and forced labor, but out of loyalty to the pharaohs."

Egypt: New Find Shows Slaves Didn't Build Pyramids



posted on Mar, 29 2010 @ 07:34 AM
link   
reply to post by ucalien
 


Where did I say slaves built the pyramids?

I clearly said workers.

By the way, if you need some more evidence in regards to the Kazneh I'll be more than happy to help you out. What did you think of the image?

[edit on 29/3/2010 by serbsta]



posted on Mar, 29 2010 @ 07:45 AM
link   
reply to post by serbsta
 




I clearly said workers.


Paid workers??? LOL, it's getting better and better. Thousands or millions of paid employees working to Egyptian empire.



posted on Mar, 29 2010 @ 08:01 AM
link   
reply to post by serbsta
 

Just more a detail to crash your theory about "workers" building Giza. The Khufu pyramid has in it measures all relation between Earth, Moon and Sun. Only astronauts with high advanced instruments could gather this data.



Does the Great Pyramid contain the Golden Ratio?

Assuming that the height of the GP = 146.515 m, and base = 230.363 m, and using simple math we find that half of the base is 115.182 m and the "slant height" is 186.369 m Dividing the "slant height" (186.369m) by "half base" (115.182m) gives = 1.6180, which is practically equal to the golden ration! The earth/moon relationship is the only one in our solar system that contains this unique golden section ratio that "squares the circle". Along with this is the phenomenon that the moon and the sun appear to be the same size, most clearly noticed during an eclipse. This too is true only from earth's vantage point…No other planet/moon relationship in our solar system can make this claim.
Although the problem of squaring the circle was proven mathematically impossible in the 19th century (as pi, being irrational, cannot be exactly measured), the Earth, the moon, and the Great Pyramid, are all coming about as close as you can get to the solution! If the base of the Great Pyramid is equated with the diameter of the earth, then the radius of the moon can be generated by subtracting the radius of the earth from the height of the pyramid (see the picture below).

The great pyramid



posted on Mar, 29 2010 @ 08:06 AM
link   
reply to post by ucalien
 


you know, it would really suck big time if it turns out the hindu texts were actually prophetic



posted on Mar, 29 2010 @ 08:06 AM
link   
reply to post by ucalien
 


I feel you have presented some very informative documentation about the Sumerian and Hindu brotheren as they did interact directly with Angels or Demons how ever one may view those who are seen in the various paintings and sculptures around planet Earth. I personally have a deep interest in the knowledge possessed by the Hindus in relation to (TRANSMIGRATION).

The believed nature of the soul (jiva or atman) has a significant impact on the Hindu belief of transmigration. In Hinduism, a soul is both immutable and *eternal* and thus the character of a soul from a previous life is imprinted on the new one.

The following quote illustrates this concept:

"Never was there a time when I did not exist, nor you, nor all these kings; nor in the future shall any of us cease to be. As the embodied soul continuously passes, in this body, from boyhood to youth to old age, the soul similarly passes into another body at death. A sober person is not bewildered by such a change". (Bhagavad Gita, Chapter 2, texts 12-13)

I have gained much intelligence from studying the Sumerians and Hindu for they possess much knowledge and have documented it for even these times for those of us with open enough minds. ALIENS AND TRANSMIGRATING ENERGY FORMS S&F for all your great efforts on ENLIGHTNING us on the Sumerian and Hindu Brothern friend THIS KNOWLEDGE PREDATES CHRISTIANITY AND ISLAM BUT IS STILL SENDING THE SAME MESSAGES ABOUT EVIL/GOOD AND ETERNIA*****. Imagine if all the knowledge was gathered today and sorted properly for the TRUTH to be shared with the total massess of Earth many people would be much better off if they really knew!




[edit on 3/29/10 by Ophiuchus 13]



posted on Mar, 29 2010 @ 08:14 AM
link   
reply to post by ucalien
 


that crude depiction of a rukma vimana is reminiscent of lonnie zamora's socorro ufo symbol





posted on Mar, 29 2010 @ 08:18 AM
link   
reply to post by ucalien
 


That is true. The Bible also speaks of the giants. Goliath, the giant that David killed, and Og another giant. It goes further to say that they were descendants of the Anak.



posted on Mar, 29 2010 @ 08:37 AM
link   
reply to post by ucalien
 


No, not necessarily paid in terms of money. Its a divided consensus but most agree that the workers did receive some kind of benefit for their work, such as healthcare, security, shelter, food, etc. Makes sense?


Originally posted by ucalien
reply to post by serbsta
 

Just more a detail to crash your theory about "workers" building Giza. The Khufu pyramid has in it measures all relation between Earth, Moon and Sun. Only astronauts with high advanced instruments could gather this data.



Its not my theory, it is the theory developed by educated scholars and archaeologists who have spent their lives working in the field and uncovering evidence. Most of these 'sacred' measurements are false, but there are some interesting ones; none however, require astronauts to have built them.

You said nothing once proven wrong about Petra and you will say nothing in regards to the workers who built the Giza complex. Stop throwing out wild claims if you aren't willing to defend them. Hand in hand, don't throw out wild claims when you know them to be false.

You honestly seem like someone who has completely turned their back on reasoning with solid evidence, I feel sorry for you, learn to accept reality. Humans are very intuitive and ingenious creatures, the fact that you can't admit this in itself speaks volumes in regards to your system of reasoning.

Cheers.





top topics
 
37
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join