Originally posted by ClintK
It never ceases to amaze me that people believe this stuff. I mean this is such obvious garbage.
"Provost Marshall?" Of exactly what military? Not the U.S. military, that's for sure. Probably some crackpot militia, and those people are
always hyperventilating and screaming, and usually quite delusional.
If there was anything to this --ANYTHING-- the news media isn't talking about it. The politicians aren't talking about it. The military isn't
talking about it. The pundits aren't either.
Exactly how is this supposed to work if the general public doesn't even know it's coming??
I can't believe the level of logical thinking in this country has sunk to such low levels.
*Sigh* I see that this thread has devolved into the typical typing BEFORE the brain even engages!
A couple of quick things... First of all, if this was true, and I'm not saying it is, the public would NOT be aware of it. Certainly not from the
ministry of propaganda, AKA the MSM! Next, the military CERTAINLY wouldn't be talking about it. Nor the politcians who would likely be subject to
criminal proceedings as a result of it.
The military has sworn an oath, to preserve and protect the Constitution from ALL enemies, foreign and domestic. Being from a military family and
having dozens of close friends and associates in the armed forces or holding civilian positions of authority, I can attest to the fact that they take
this oath VERY seriously.
What I do know, and this has been happening for decades, is that there are two distinct forces within the Pentagon. The first supports completely the
military industrial complex and has sworn allegience to it. The second are the traditionalists who believe that the military is at the service of the
people and their authority is limited by the Constitution and their oath to protect and preserve it. This internal struggle was born of the Vietnam
conflict and festers to this very day. It is not without merit to believe that the traditional forces in the military would make these moves given
the state of the union this day.
Next, The Provost Marshal General
would be the one to
execute EXACTLY this authority should such orders be warranted as there is no other arm within US Army to execute and serve notice.
The next item to focus on is the notion of "Coup." The country underwent a velvet coup in 1913 with the establishment of the Federal Reserve Bank
and the conversion of the courts to the UCC and away from Common Law. This was uncontested as this was viewed, at the time, of being purely political
and legislative maneuvering and was not fully realized for what it was until many many decades later. IF... and that is the operant word here... IF
this were true, this would not be a coup, but a restoration of the principles upon which this country was founded and established and would fall well
within the legal authority offered the military and the Provost Marshal General. They would be simply restoring the Republic to its intended form of
Finally, my own opinions and thoughts on the matter... First it is important to understand what the De Jure Grand Jury was and how it worked. See
the description here at Wiki
. Pay special attention to the following:
"In the early decades of the United States grand juries played a major role in public matters. During that period counties followed the traditional
practice of requiring all decisions be made by at least 12 of the grand jurors, so that for a size of 23 a bare majority would be 12. Any citizen
could bring a matter before it directly, from a public work that needed repair, to a delinquent official, to a complaint of a crime, and they could
conduct their own investigations. In that era most criminal prosecutions were conducted by private parties, either a law enforcement officer, a lawyer
hired by a crime victim or his family, or even by laymen, who could bring a bill of indictment to the grand jury, and if the grand jury found there
was sufficient evidence for a trial, that the act was a crime under law, and that the court had jurisdiction, then by returning the indictment to the
complainant, it appointed him to exercise the authority of an attorney general, that is, one having a general power of attorney to represent the state
in the case. The grand jury served to screen out incompetent or malicious prosecutions. The advent of official public prosecutors in the later
decades of the 19th century largely displaced private prosecutions, but also led to their capturing grand juries and using them in ways for which they
were not originally intended."
As one can clearly see, the power of the grand jury was held by the people. It wasn't until 1913 that the Grand Jury powers were delegated to a
prosecutor under Uniform Commercial Code in obvious violation to the laws of the Republic. So, in essence, our court system has been illegal for the
past 100 years! It would not be at all inconceivable to believe that Common Law Grand Juries have been convened for the very purpose of investigating
and evaluating evidence in conjunction with high crimes, misdemeanors or even treason and sedition as would have been done under the original articles
of the Constitution.
So, back to my thoughts... I believe that all of this is certainly possible and theoretically conceivable. The pieces being described are certainly
lawful under the Constitution and actionable by the Provost Marshal General. NOw, does that mean that this is what has happened? I obviously have no
idea and only time will tell. BUT, the descriptions of everything I have read and the content of the videos DO accurately describe what one would
reasonably assume would transpire in the event that the military sanctioned it. I'm not going to immediately jump on anyone and say, "NO way, it's
BS!" but I am also not going to say that this is happenning. I will say that I remain hopeful that this IS occurring as it is likely the last
remaining avenue we have without having to resort to a violent revolution. My prayers are with the folks trying to initiate this strategy!