It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Unless this will be counted among those partisan issues which will create conflict generating nothing but drama and few tangible results.
Originally posted by Dock9
reply to post by whatukno
Well, I for one won't be calling you an 'Obama-bot' or whatever the other term you mentioned was
It's great, isn't it --- what Obama's doing in this an many other areas ?
Of course it's going to be better for everyone, this cutting out the loathesome Middle Men --- great for everyone except the Middle Men and too bad for them
I'm more impressed with Obama with every day that passes
He's brokered a deal with Russia to mutually reduce arms. Where's the celebrations ?
For once, it seems as if the US has a leader with a working brain ! Yipee !
No longer are the liars and Online Troops going to influence me against this man
Go Obama
For once, it seems as if the US has a leader with a working brain ! Yipee !
Originally posted by nixie_nox
A lot of the colleges need revamping themselves. There is so much corruption in the school system. The college education system is another monster that needs an overhaul that has been overlooked for far too long.
College costs are sky high, and getting higher. You have too many upper management stealing money and spending it on stupid stuff. It is very corrupt.
I think there needs to be more transparency in how colleges spend money.
Yet so many places require a degree to get anywhere, instead of relying on credibility and good ol fashioned experience.
Only in the US do you take a 50k gamble, not guaranteed anything, and the school doesn't have any accountability on funds.
My state gets a D- for affordability, and they want to raise tuition 5% for the state schools to make up a budget class.
Talk about something becoming only accessible to the elite.
Originally posted by Sestias
reply to post by bigfatfurrytexan
Sounds like an interesting proposal; I agree with a lot of it.
However, I balk at the idea of deciding what a child's career path will be IN KINDERGARTEN. How do you know at that early an age whether a child will be college material, much less suited for a defined career?
And what about the students who are poor or minorities; isn't there a danger that preconceived ideas about them could cause them to be channeled prematurely into "dead end" jobs?
I've known some people from Greece and other countries who take college entrance exams their last year of school. Those who pass (and the exams are hard) receive funding for college through their governments.
It seems to me seniors can be sorted out more effectively than kindergartners.
Also, how do you know 12 years beforehand what jobs there will be a demand for? This changes year by year, not decade by decade.
[edit on 27-3-2010 by Sestias]
Remember, no matter what Obama does, it must be an evil plot to destroy the United States.
Originally posted by David9176
reply to post by whatukno
Remember, no matter what Obama does, it must be an evil plot to destroy the United States.
It's true. It doesn't matter how all the different ways he's plotting to destroy America contradict with each other.
Pretty soon he's gonna line up all us folk in the firing squads.
Yesterday...I actually seen a slight hint of devil horns on his forehead. He was also doing satanic hand gestures and spitting on statues of the virgin mary.
He peed in the holy water man!!!! The man is pure evils.
Brown Shows Why Tuition Charges Are Worse than Taxes October 2nd, 2009 | Category: Undergraduate EducationShare This Post Earlier this year, Brown University’s governing board voted to set tuition at $38,048 for the 2009-10 academic year—a 3 percent, or $1,108.19, increase from the previous year’s mark. This morning, the Brown Daily Herald reported that thanks to an unexpected $2 million tuition surplus, the school would be speeding up the construction process for an on-campus student center so that it could open at the start of the 2010-11 academic year, rather than in December. The extra funds would be used to cover the overtime costs and higher contract prices due to less time for competitive bidding.
But in the months after being selected to receive the Homeland Security funds, Stevens became mired in an ugly legal battle with the state attorney general's office over allegations that it not only misspent money, but that it grossly overpaid its president and floated him sweetheart loans for a vacation home in Vermont.
Produce an application deluge. An important measure of success is selectivity; and selectivity begins with lots of applications for admissions. So a college should market itself to as many audiences as possible, encourage applications from one and all (whether or not the applicant can get in or is interested in the place), make it as easy as possible to complete and pay for an application, and promote the notion that the college is the ideal "back-up" or "alternative" institution. Admissions staff should not discourage any students from applying, even if their chances of getting in are slim or their interests better pursued elsewhere.
Reject as many as possible. The second half of the selectivity equation is to accept the lowest percentage of those who apply, which means disappointing as many applicants as possible. The trick is to not accept any applicant who won't actually enroll (called "yield" by professionals) or, as at least one institution has tried, turn down those who are most able and most likely to go elsewhere. To minimize turndowns from students, colleges can: use as many early-decision dates as possible; pay careful attention to clues from interviews or prior applicant profiles; use financial or other inducements with wavering students; recognize that amenities like classy dormitories are more persuasive than numbers of periodicals in the library; and actively recruit the "chosen."