It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by margaretr
Russian research by Dr A. N. Dmitriev
www.tmgnow.com... -
Summary Paragraph
Current PlanetoPhysical alterations of the Earth are becoming irreversible. Strong evidence exists that these transformations are being caused by highly charged material and energetic non-uniformity's in anisotropic interstellar space which have broken into the interplanetary area of our Solar System. This "donation" of energy is producing hybrid processes and excited energy states in all planets, as well as the Sun. Effects here on Earth are to be found in the acceleration of the magnetic pole shift, in the vertical and horizontal ozone content distribution, and in the increased frequency and magnitude of significant catastrophic climatic events. There is growing probability that we are moving into a rapid temperature instability period similar to the one that took place 10,000 years ago. The adaptive responses of the biosphere, and humanity, to these new conditions may lead to a total global revision of the range of species and life on Earth. It is only through a deep understanding of the fundamental changes taking place in the natural environment surrounding us that politicians, and citizens a like, will be able to achieve balance with the renewing flow of PlanetoPhysical states and processes.
[edit on 27-3-2010 by margaretr]
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by antonia
A "regular occurrence"? Hardly.
It has happened a lot but it follows no pattern. The last reversal was about 780,000 years ago. There was one 180,000 years before that. Then 160,000 before that. Then 130,000 before that. Then 590,000 before that.
I would call that a lot more irregular than regular.
Actually, both magnetic- related to the compass, and "true"- related to the Earth's axis of rotation are azimuths. The difference between magnetic and true azimuths is called "declination", where if magnetic north is west of true north that is considered negative declination and if magnetic north is east of true north that is considered positive declination.
Originally posted by St Udio
Originally posted by theability
What your referring to, is the difference from North on the map, compared to true magnetic north, or AZIMUTH.
Thanks,
that's the name i couldn't think of.
now, its established that there was/is/has always been a wandering North magnetic pole, so unless the N magnetic pole suddenly shows up in the Hawaiian Latitude in a matter of hours or days.... just consider the fluxuations normal and not the precurser to a pole reversal...
thanks again
(its also good to know that peoples actually read replies)
Originally posted by jumpingbeanz
en.wikipedia.org...
quote//
One idea proposed in these films involves a geomagnetic reversal (often incorrectly referred to as a polar shift by proponents of this hypothesis), which could be triggered by a massive solar flare, one with energy equal to 100 billion atomic bombs.[68] This belief is supposedly supported by observations that the Earth's magnetic field is weakening,[69] which indicates an impending reversal of the north and south magnetic poles. Scientists believe the Earth is overdue for a geomagnetic reversal, and has been for a long time, even since the time of the Mayans, because the last reversal was 780,000 years ago.[70] Critics, however, claim geomagnetic reversals take up to 5,000 years to complete, and do not start on any particular date. Also, NOAA now predicts that the solar maximum will peak in 2013, not 2012, and that it will be fairly weak, with a below-average number of sunspots.[71] In any case, there is no scientific evidence linking a solar maximum to a geomagnetic reversal.[72] A solar maximum would be mostly notable for its effects on satellite and cellular phone communications.[73]
_____________________________________________________________________
saw this in wikipedia and wondered if there was any truth to it or scienctific evidence that what wikipedia is saying is really correct..
[edit on 27-3-2010 by jumpingbeanz]
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by antonia
A "regular occurrence"? Hardly.
It has happened a lot but it follows no pattern. The last reversal was about 780,000 years ago. There was one 180,000 years before that. Then 160,000 before that. Then 130,000 before that. Then 590,000 before that.
I would call that a lot more irregular than regular.
Turn your compass 180 and indeed it would.
Originally posted by ressiv
on an tablet found in agient sumerie.. was written that the sun came up in the west.....
Originally posted by abecedarian
Turn your compass 180 and indeed it would.
Originally posted by ressiv
on an tablet found in agient sumerie.. was written that the sun came up in the west.....
But did the Sumerian's have compasses?
NOAA now predicts that the solar maximum will peak in 2013, not 2012
I also heard a theory that it may be affecting the Bee's and this is causing their Dying Off. However I think that's just a theory.