posted on Apr, 6 2010 @ 09:30 AM
In my humble opinion, and once I've heard the reply of the witness:
the story could even be true, but the photos have nothing to do with it.
Sorry OP, not stating that I don't believe you, but six/seven/eight/thousands shots showing the same blurry formation in the same exact position with
the same exact size are in strong contrast with your statement istelf and the absence of any points of reference make any assessment useles: was it
MOVING or was it STUCK?
It's useless your quote about the shutter speed: I think I know what is a shutter speed: talk about your sighting.
Do you realize that if you were using a tripod then we would have noticed some variation, since it was moving, according not to me but to you?
IF it was moving then the photos are to trash, but if it was stuck, then your statement is to trash. The third possible explanation is some variation
on the apparatus given from God knows what, but static and consistent with the apparatus. How long the sighting lasted may I ask you?
[edit on 6/4/2010 by internos]