Who’s Watching The Watcher?
Originally posted by dgtempe
Majic, with all due respect, YOU are not verifiable, but you're verifying another poster? hmmmmmmmmm
Absolutely correct. For all you know, I may even be SBP logged in under a different account. Other than revealing both our “real life” identities,
which I have no intention of doing, I know of no way to prove anything about either of us.
When I say that I have verified SBP’s identity, I know full well that although I am being honest in telling you this, that there’s still no way for
you to know if I am being honest.
Thus those curious about SBP being the “real deal” are still left with an unanswered question.
Perhaps the best way to know one way or another is to use your own psychic ability to solve the riddle?
I’m Sorry, What Was The Question Again?
I’m having trouble seeing how all this election talk about Kerry and whatnot relates to SBP’s predictions, unless we infer that Kerry is going to
“assassinate” Bush on Election Day.
While I think that’s all somewhat off-topic, I’ll weigh in with my own prediction about who will win the election, and here it is:
I predict that the best candidate for the job will be elected.
Condolences to those voting for the wrong guy, and you know who you are! Maybe next time.
The Circle Of Life
I am still very skeptical of the idea that SBP or anyone else can actually see the future.
Of course, in light of my own dabblings in prophecy, that would seem at first like hypocrisy, but I maintain that it is not. I’m pretty sure that I
can’t see the future either.
So what are these premonitions, predictions and prophecies based on? Well, as always, I could be dead wrong, but I think they are not glimpses of the
future, but the
past. In other words, they are memories of similar events that have happened in past cycles of existence.
Supporting this unintuitive rationale are my own rather wacky adventures over the past month, and I won’t even try to recount them here, especially in
light of their massive volume.
The short, short version of this theory:
1. The process of Creation consists of a series of Cycles of Divergence and Convergence.
2. A Divergence is the splitting of a Creator into individual souls which experience a series of lives in a shared hallucination we call “reality”.
3. A Convergence occurs when all souls reunite at the end of a Cycle and share what they have learned.
4. When all souls have learned what all other souls have learned, they split (I call that a “Parting”) and each go on to create a new Cycle of their
own. Creators multiply this way.
5. A new soul is created with each Divergence, adding a unique but modest element of novelty to each Cycle. In this way, souls multiply and new Cycles
become more complex.
6. The amount of change evident from one Cycle to the next is relatively small, but the minor variations which result are the true products of
Creation.
7. The ultimate “Goal” is the achievement of a reality in which no Convergence occurs. This would mean a “dead end” on the “Tree of Life” (comprised
of all Cycles of existence, or Totality), but also a universe which has true Freewill instead of Destiny, which rules us now and will continue to do
so until we achieve the Final Cycle for our line of Creation.
8. Achieving Freewill requires a minimum level complexity, or a universe will inevitably collapse to Singularity due to entropy. Such a collapse
results in a “default Convergence”, although Convergence is usually voluntarily elected much sooner.
9. Every soul contains all knowledge gained not only from the last Convergence, but from all prior Convergences as well, all the way back to the
Original Creator.
Prophecy or Perfidy?
Yep, I know it sounds pretty nuts, but that’s my best stab at the nature of Life, the Universe and Everything, and thus my working model for now.
So does that mean SBP’s visions are true or false? I really don’t know.
However, if they are memories of, say, a time like this one in the
last cycle of existence, then they may be fairly close because each Cycle
varies by relatively small amounts from the previous one.
Pithy explanation or whacked-out theory? You decide.
Majic
[edit on 9/15/2004 by Majic]
