South Korean navy ship sinks, North link played down, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 134 times


reply posted on 26-3-2010 @ 10:37 AM by reject
reply to post by kdial1



here I thought that sick bastard was sick and dying

I just hope this doesn't escalate to another full blown war


reply posted on 26-3-2010 @ 10:40 AM by Erasurehead
reply to post by MagoSA



A star for the Johnny Dangerously quote. Funny movie.

The US has a permanent base in South Korea with about 40,000 troops stationed there so the US would have no trouble providing support the the South if war was to break out.

Hopefully it doesn't but this has gone on for almost 60 years now, at some point a final resolution to the Korean war will have to take place.


reply posted on 26-3-2010 @ 10:47 AM by Raud
reply to post by lpowell0627



The North has always used this tactic;
Bring out their rusty guns and wave them about, revoking all treaties, for one simple reason: they want aid.

When ever they get "scary", the west calm them down with some aid.
The North knows the procedure...


reply posted on 26-3-2010 @ 10:53 AM by TheCoffinman
www.reuters.com...
A South Korean naval vessel with more than 100 aboard was sinking on Friday in waters near North Korea and Seoul was investigating whether it was hit in a torpedo attack by the North, South Korean media said.

Broadcaster SBS said many South Korean sailors on the stricken vessel were feared dead.

South Korea's YTN TV network said the government was investigating whether the sinking was due to a torpedo attack by the North, and Yonhap news agency said the Seoul government had convened an emergency meeting of security-related ministers.

Yonhap also reported a South Korean navy ship firing toward an unidentified vessel to the north.


looks serious guys, if there are already sailors feared dead then my guess would be an explosion which means torpedo. war has started between countries with far less provocation then this... as many have pointed out whats does kim jong il have to lose..


reply posted on 26-3-2010 @ 10:53 AM by Mdv2
reply to post by hawaiinguy12



And we also know that you'll die one day. Why not kill you now?


reply posted on 26-3-2010 @ 10:57 AM by Erasurehead
Originally posted by Raud
reply to
post by lpowell0627



The North has always used this tactic;
Bring out their rusty guns and wave them about, revoking all treaties, for one simple reason: they want aid.

When ever they get "scary", the west calm them down with some aid.
The North knows the procedure...


I agree but this time a ship was sunk. Usually it just involves some firing back and forth with very little or no damage. This is an escalation of tactics.


reply posted on 26-3-2010 @ 10:59 AM by palg1
Originally posted by DaddyBare


So it would seem. if true... this attack wasn't unprovoked... AKA South Kora is not an innocent victim

BBC story

Don't be so quick to call the south the provocateur. They may have been responding to the detection of the torpedo. It often takes some time for a torpedo to reach it's target.

I suggest you wait for the whole story before pointing the finger.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^