 |
|
Topic started on 12-7-2002 @ 04:51 AM by CG
|
Nice rant that makes some good points.
Read Article
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-7-2002 @ 12:25 PM by Bob88
|
How did Bush steal the election though? I see it the other way around. Gore lost 4 recounts, one of which was illegitimate. I think it was Gore who
tried to steal the election. You might not like the Electoral College system but that doesnít mean Bush stole the election. The mentality of the
writer in that link is so stereotypical. ëWhen all else fails, blame the government, blame the MAN.í He should get on with life instead of whining
about Bushís intelligence (he attended Yale and Harvard and has an MBA) ñ Gore didnít complete graduate school.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-7-2002 @ 04:13 PM by CG
|
I have said before and I'll say it again!
Do the math!
*1 country
*300,000,000 citizens
*1 family
*less than 2 decades
*2 Presidents
*1 Governor, key state.
*Republican majority Supreme Court
*All kinds of BS pulled in florida, running up to the election, to negate the black vote.
You recon thats all just providence do you?
I wish we had a mathematician to work out the odds of this happening by chance and good fortune.
The fix was in, bet on it!
Don't ask me how, if I knew that I'd write a book.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-7-2002 @ 04:57 PM by Bob88
|
That's some fuzzy math, CG. Could it be the better men were elected. Gore's father was a powerful Democratic Senator. Gore couldn't carry his own
state.
Actually, I have read the black votes that were negated were black REPUBLICANS. You don't hear
stuff like that in the mainstream media though.
Another consideration is the media calling a winner before the polls closed. this was the case in Florida - the networks were calling Gore the winner
when people still could vote. If you were on your way to vote for Bush and you heard Gore already won the election, would you still vote? The reality
is Bush could have won the popular vote as well - and very easily.
As far as the pledge goes, the guy who sued that started this whole mess with the pledge doesn't even live with his daughter that he claims he was
suing for. PLUS, his daughter is a Christian whose mom said she has NO problem whatsoever saying the pledge. It was a bogus lawsuit to begin with. The
same people that want us to leave God out of the pledge DEMAND that the prisoners at Camp X-ray be allowed to practice their Islam. Liberal hypocrisy.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-7-2002 @ 05:45 PM by CG
|
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-7-2002 @ 06:46 PM by CG
|
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-7-2002 @ 10:06 PM by Bob88
|
If holding on to the stock was for the sake of the IPO and said IPO didn't take place then why the need to hold on to the stock??
The dems are going to have to come up with something better than this...they've got NOTHING.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-7-2002 @ 12:05 AM by CG
|
Ripping people off for how many hundreds of thousand of dollars, constitutes a crime in your book? I mean since $800,000.00 don't seem to do it for
you, what does?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-7-2002 @ 12:47 AM by Pandora
|
CG, you aren't alone in this... i feel ya...
Bush got his daddy and everyone else to fix it so he would be pres... i have had this discussion with republicans before.. and i will say it again...
who got more votes from the american public? gore.. forget about what kind of job he would have done, etc.. point is, he won the votes.. but how the
system is set up, bush got it.. such.. ahh.. dont' get me started.. complete bullsh=t!!!! the country is falling to pieces and this retarded crook is
still there..
anyways.. i don't think any of us will get anywhere as long as we argue about this type of political issue.. because it all boils down to opinions..
and well, thing is, some people are so close minded that they cannot accept other's views as just that.. opinions....
so, this post had a little bit of something do with the pledge.. well, just wanna give my opinion because i can... but, i say, leave the god part out
of it...for those who think it should be left in and that this whole controversy is worthless, i say to you, well, then how about we change it to one
nation under allah, or satan, or athena? if we are going to have laws separating church and state, this is clearly a violation... if people are gonna
bitch and moan about it, then do away with that law...i swear, sometimes i think the war on drugs is just so these idiots in d.c. can legally obtain
these substances while they conjure up these laws that are oh, so good for us...to have god in the pledge is not freedom of religion..
okay, i got my ranting done for the day..
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-7-2002 @ 09:09 AM by Bob88
|
Pandora, the popular vote doesnít elect presidents. Didnít you learn this in school? How did ëhis daddy fix it so he would win?í I would love to hear
more about this. As far as the popular vote goes, had the media not called the election in Gores favor while the polls were still open more people
would have voted ñ in reality Bush could have won the popular vote.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-7-2002 @ 10:58 AM by 1943alter
|
U.S. Court of Appeals
Dennis Miller said something worth repeating!!
He said recently on his show, regarding the judges who
declared the Pledge of Allegiance unconstitutional:
"So, Your Honor, the Pledge is unconstitutional because it says
'Under God'. Guess that means when you were sworn in with
your hand on a Bible, and at the end of your oath repeated,
'So Help Me God' that makes your job unconstitutional,
therefore you have no job, which means your ruling doesn't
mean s---."
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-7-2002 @ 04:47 AM by CG
|
Originally posted by 1943alter
U.S. Court of Appeals
Dennis Miller said something worth repeating!!
He said recently on his show, regarding the judges who
declared the Pledge of Allegiance unconstitutional:
"So, Your Honor, the Pledge is unconstitutional because it says
'Under God'. Guess that means when you were sworn in with
your hand on a Bible, and at the end of your oath repeated,
'So Help Me God' that makes your job unconstitutional,
therefore you have no job, which means your ruling doesn't
mean s---." 
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-7-2002 @ 06:13 PM by nyeff
|
The only thing that guy did was make life harder on his daughter.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-7-2002 @ 06:27 PM by Bob88
|
especially since his daughter is a Christian and enjoys saying the pledge.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-7-2002 @ 02:50 AM by CG
|
Piss on it then, if nothing binds us, than nothing is what we will end up with.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-7-2002 @ 02:44 PM by MidnightDStroyer
|
As far as I'm concerned, leave the pledge alone & let people handle the "under God" part according to their own conscious...Isn't that a part of
"Freedom of Choice"?
No one should have the right to *force* other people to say the pledge one way or another, or even to say a pledge or not.
Gah! Another personal freedom being ripped away from us, just like the countless other freedoms that have gone before.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-7-2002 @ 12:20 PM by Bob88
|
I think many of the present day problems can be attributed to Clinton, from economics to terrorism.
Bush, having had a higher level of support than even FDR will win reelection.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-7-2002 @ 09:24 PM by CG
|
But that aint gonna last if you are the one making things bad. I wish the fool would just get a BJ and quit trying to start wars all over the planet!
I know a number of people that won't be voting for the fool again, even if it means putting Gore in office!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-7-2002 @ 10:32 PM by Bob88
|
How is he the one making things bad?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-7-2002 @ 05:42 AM by Thomas Crowne
|
Yeah, that'll make things much better! Replace Bush with the biggest anti-American idiot that could run, other than Hillary!
How about Jim Traficant, assuming he beats the raps on appeals? Anybody find it strange how the entire House (save Gary Condit) voted to expell him?
Come on, you mean to tell me even though these guys have done more crap than the average citizen would ever imagine doing, Jim had to be tossed?
I say Jim oughta rune, and I say we oughta vote for him, and I say he'd do better than George of Al.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |