It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by constantwonder
Since when did ATS start believing in tweets and blogs?
Originally posted by IceHappy
...I know 911 was an inside job and I know the Government has been up to no good for decades. Problem is that there has not been concrete proof. I hope April 5 will produce a video that will allow those of us who know to have the "ah ha" here is what a smoking gun looks like to non believers. ...
Originally posted by Tomis_Nexis
Aside from ONE BLOG (I believe blogs are as useful as a high school newspaper) is there any proof of this?
Over the last few years, WikiLeaks has been the subject of hostile acts by security organizations...
But the increase in surveillance activities this last month, in a time when we are barely publishing due to fundraising, are excessive. Some of the new interest is related to a film exposing a U.S. massacre we will release at the U.S. National Press Club on April 5.
Originally posted by Tomis_Nexis
Aside from ONE BLOG (I believe blogs are as useful as a high school newspaper) is there any proof of this?
Originally posted by smurfy
reply to post by TheStev
Hi Stev,
Tomisn is deliberately placing emphasis on "THE BLOG" when it is clear that the source is Wikileaks using Twitter. There is no debate, just rhetoric.
I agree, and the high school "confidential" reference, just fell out of the sky! I wish I had a high school blog when I was at school
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
Originally posted by smurfy
reply to post by TheStev
Hi Stev,
Tomisn is deliberately placing emphasis on "THE BLOG" when it is clear that the source is Wikileaks using Twitter. There is no debate, just rhetoric.
Besides, ad hominem applies to the debater as well as their topics. Attacking the validity of a source by calling into question things like motives or how well established they are is silly, fallacious, and low brow.
Either the information is true or not, regardless of how much the mouth that tells it likes to lie.
Our production meeting used a discreet, closed, backroom, because we were working on the analysis of a classified U.S. military video showing civilian kills by U.S. pilots. During the interrogation, a specific reference was made by police to the video—which could not have been understood from that day’s exterior surveillance alone. Another specific reference was made to “important”, but unnamed Icelandic figures. References were also made to the names of two senior journalists at the production meeting.