posted on Mar, 24 2010 @ 08:18 PM
Super sunglasses, and out of this world high-tech cameras of the future, mood altering devices, to give everyone in the crowd a happy feeling.
But unfortunately for "Albert" with all this AMAZING future technology. They still havent come up with a cure for men's hair loss
30 years old at best, and his hairline is receiting terribly ,his hair is terribly thin. I figure he'll be bald by 45. Terrible by futuristic
standards, terrible even by todays standards!
Albert: "Hey, if you gonna gonna give me the super X-ray specs, please give me a full head of hair on me gulliver to impress the devochka looking at
me camera. Dear Brothers!" (yes mid century, Young British hooligan gang slang is the way they talk in the future. Why? I haven't the slightest.)
Sorry, but there is absolutely nothing but the desperate WANT and DESIRE by the original poster and others for this to be true. Try loking up JOHN
TITOR, much better evidence there. But still very poor when one deny's ignorance. But hey knock yourselves out.
The guy only stands out in the picture cause he's tall and the only one of maybe 3 people in the semi large group under the age of 35. Plus, the
photo(most likely cropped, to center him. It all makes him stand out.
But standing out does not make you a time traveller.
Sunglasses, and cameras(which we still havent pinpointed the type as he's covering most of it) ,so on to the sunglasses. All different types and
shapes we're the "in thing in the 40's and 50's. The Larger the better! See them making a comeback a few years ago. Every pop icon was wearing
these huge rediculous shades.
As far as the OP 's raybans with the spider logo. I see ZERO similarity between those and Alberts. Save for them being black,
Alberts are more squared off around the eyes and side of eye, while the ray bans are rounded. Alberts have a high arch of some material that is
roughly between his eye and ear, the ray-bans, streamlined all the way from eye to ear.
I understand peoples want and desire for time travel to be true. But you can't go off half cocked on one grainy photograph.
As far as the swiss clock ring. I call practical joke or a plant, by one of the Asian archeological crew.
If time travel were possible, and I believe it may be, but not for humans to jump around like in "Back to the Future". Don't you think they'd be
here from the future by now en masse?
Although I do believe we HAVE made attempts at time travel. The Montauk Project. The Philidelphia Experiment (movie based on the Montauk Project?) and
it had Terrible, Terrible results. I'm sure you all know about the stories.
But again if time travel were ever going to be possible on a large scale, wouldn't people be hear from the future in droves
Beatles-Uncle Albert.(edit not a Beatles song, McCartney and Wings song). Thank You BlupBlup for correcting my error!
"We're so sorry Uncle Albert
Wer'e so sorry if we caused you any pain
We're so sorry Uncle Albert
But theres no one left at home
And I believe Im gonna rain
We're so sorry but we havent heard a thing all day
Were so sorry Uncle Albert
But' if anything should happen well be sure to give a ring."
McCartney Lyrics, pretty profound, especially when they get to the "ring" part or the last line of the first verse. hehe. I've cracked the case. He
was a scout for the McCartney sent from the future! Most likely one of thier Uncles if the timelines are correct!!! Remember Paul was knighted by the
Queen of England herself, so he probably has Royal blood-line. Sir Paul.
If you delve deeper into the Chorus it gets spookier...
"Hands across the waters" (waters of time perhaps?)
"Hands across the sky"(sky=space, wormholes ect?)
It gives me a whole new outlook to the meaning of this song.
"Real ,Horrorshow; My Fellow Droogies."
signed - 655321
(sorry I must admit I just got done watching Kubriks "A clockwork Orange. I've seen it dozens of times, and it's easily one of my top 5 favorite
films of all time. The book is even better).
Anyhow a single photo of wierd looking hipster in a crowd of OLD people with slightly unusual sunglasses, and a partially concealed camera makes for a
Time Traveller now?? Pah-Lease! Wow how our standards have gone WAY WAY down here at ATS if anyone even remotely takes this seriously.
Yes it's fun to speculate, but at the end of the day a single "unremarkable" photo does not make a Full case study for Time Travelling.
[edit on 24-3-2010 by Nola213]