It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Chadwickus
I think there are two different (large blobs, at least) on the window.
She also said she had sent the images to Bureau of Meteorology and Sydney Observatory and they both confirmed there has been no tampering with the photos.
That, and the fact that an iPhone doesn't have a flash.
www.apple.com...
[edit on 3/23/2010 by Phage]
Featured: Sign the Petition for an Open App Store on iPhone [Video]
5 Features Apple Should Add to iPhone 2.0
4. iPhone camera flash
I don’t know how Apple could include a camera flash without draining the phone battery, but let’s leave that up to their tech guys. T-Mobile’s Sidekick sports a camera flash so why can’t the iPhone?
I notice that the image in the video is slightly different to the ones from the OP.
FWIW I think I found the location of where she took the photo too.
Can be found HERE
Hell it's probably a booger she tried to flick out the window a few times...
On the radio interview i heard, the women claims she got out of the car to take the photos of the sun set, then she caught the UFO too. So there should not be any glare from the windscreen.
Also I have an iPhone and some shots do cause glare when you have a bright light source.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Chadwickus
Here's another
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/0769443c8a27.jpg[/atsimg]
At least it makes it clear that it is a streetlight. It illuminates the trees.
[edit on 3/24/2010 by Phage]
Originally posted by wayaboveitall
She also said she had sent the images to Bureau of Meteorology and Sydney Observatory and they both confirmed there has been no tampering with the photos.
Are The Bureau of Meteorology and Sydney Observatory, photographic experts?
Originally posted by zazzafrazz
Originally posted by Phage
Nope our street lamps aren't higher than a gum tree
Nope our street lamps aren't higher than a gum tree
So far, i don't see a shred of dependable evidence that these pics were taken behind glass. There might be some, but no-one here has made anything more than a derisory and frankly, laughable, attempt a *debunking* it. Really, some of the posts on here stating, I am sure, I am definite are truly risible.
Without a doubt both photos were taken inside of her car.
Reflection is pretty clear, good work Chad.
Gum grows on trees?
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by FireMoon
As I said before, I can't see the hood of my car from the driver's seat and a camera has a narrower field of view than I do.
As I said before, I can't see the hood of my car from the driver's seat and a camera has a narrower field of view than I do.
Originally posted by FireMoon
I'm still waiting for phage to answer the question about the *height * of the pictures and how, given their scope they don't show any bonnet (hood) or other parts of the car's interior.
Originally posted by Phage
Originally posted by zazzafrazz
Originally posted by Phage
Nope our street lamps aren't higher than a gum tree
Gum grows on trees?
If you're where the black car is, they can appear to be.
Streetlight
[edit on 3/24/2010 by Phage]
and not changed shape at all..
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by FireMoon
Ok. You tell me what kind of car she drives. If it's a Jaguar, you've probably got me. If it's a Focus, I win. If it's something else, we'll have to figure something out.
I just checked my car. The windshield isn't flat (it is kind of dirty though) but the "flares" from a streetlight are straight, not curved.