UFO in Sydney Australia

page: 46
33
<< 43  44  45    47  48  49 >>

log in

join

posted on Mar, 28 2010 @ 05:08 PM
link   

She concedes she (now realizes she) inadvertently CAPTURED the street light (in her photo) which was not part of her encounter though!



She claims it WAS part of her encounter. She says so specifically.


This was an additional (accidental) bi-product that, she didn't realize was filmed! She now realizes, she did! (see: Murphys Law)



She claims it WAS part of her encounter. She says so specifically.


respectfully ask you go back and read her iterations.



I respectfully ask you to go back and listen to the 2GB radio interveiw.


www.2gb.com...

[edit on 28-3-2010 by wayaboveitall]




posted on Mar, 28 2010 @ 05:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by keepureye2thesky
1971 PT Cruiser?!
Ok, are we done now?!
Fiona (with all due respect) is not well informed about much that goes on
around her and is mildly delusional. Does that make her a bad person?
No, of course not. However, her story has too many holes and she has
inevitably lost her credibility with her latest claim.

Perhaps she really believes she owns a 1971 PT Cruiser. If this is the case,
then how could her account be taken seriously?!

just because some one makes a typing error you dedicate so much time to the one and only error i have made it is obvious the car was not made in 1971 as a pic was poster off my facebook i am starting to think that maby i should be questioning some of your inteligence those of you who have wasted time on a typing error i will state that my PT CRUISER IS A 2001 MODEL AND I APOLIGISE FOR THE TYPING ERROR



posted on Mar, 28 2010 @ 05:10 PM
link   
welcome back Mrs Hartigan.



posted on Mar, 28 2010 @ 05:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by wayaboveitall
Did your listen to the broadcast TwoPhish? Is it not word for word what I quoted?
Now your making up scenarios to fit her version of events, scenarios that are not born out by evidence.



[edit on 28-3-2010 by wayaboveitall]


I was the one who originally embedded that clip. So needless to say, I've heard it. Three times now in fact!

Listen. I know this is looking bad for Fiona.

But, there is still...............the slight possibility, she is telling the truth but, there are a bunch of serendipitous speed bumps which..... she wasn't counting on to occur!

It's like the ol' "yeah...but" conundrum.

"Yeah Officer I know it looks like that BUT.................."

"Yeah Mom I know it appears like that BUT........."

There will always be that yin/yang......."yeah/but" cycle of events.
And if you're innocent, that can really suck!

That doesn't mean you're lying. It COULD mean you're telling the truth but for some reason, it's hard to resonate with. Still doesn't mean they're wrong!

And I happen to think/feel this is what's happening.

Again, call me a fool!
And again, she did not say that lamp post was the object she saw that evening.



posted on Mar, 28 2010 @ 05:20 PM
link   
Its funny how so many people get caught up, in the moment and just get carried away with their pretty little pics, yet ignore what others are asking or putting forward as other bits of info which might help.

To the few people that have asked about wanting interior shots of Fionas PT Cruiser i put a link up way back on page 38 of this thread, made a comment as to what the "experts" might think but still no reply....


Fiona mentioned a few pages back that she owns a 1971 PT Cruiser, as far as i know PT Cruisers were manufactured from 2001...

Also from what I recall (correct me if Iam wrong as we have over 45 odd pages here)she mentioned that she leant across the middle of the bonnet, she must have jumped on the bonnet since she stated she is 5'2 (once again correct me if im wrong due to the length of this topic) because these vehicles have long bonnets....




Going by the excitement on her facebook page of "weird" going ons that was put up by another poster way back, I think Fiona got excited over something that really wasnt what is claimed to be....

I think Phage called this correctly from the start.

This might just be a genuine misinterpretation, as some things stated by witness dont add up when presented with the evidence by others, I think due to over excitement, much like a similar thread that was posted a while back with the UK blob on a car _



posted on Mar, 28 2010 @ 05:24 PM
link   

That doesn't mean you're lying. It COULD mean you're telling the truth but for some reason, it's hard to resonate with. Still doesn't mean they're wrong!

And I happen to think/feel this is what's happening.


It does mean she's wrong, she herself has since said so.



Again, call me a fool!
And again, she did not say that lamp post was the object she saw that evening.


Im afraid she did. there is no timing on the clip so I cant point out the exact point she says it, but she definately does say it! Soon after being introduced.

Others can listen and verify it for themselves.



[edit on 28-3-2010 by wayaboveitall]



posted on Mar, 28 2010 @ 05:26 PM
link   
reply to post by missfee
 


Hi missfee Fiona, I've just noticed the media contacted the Sydney Observatory. So I guess you contacted the media first than. I'm trying to see how this got out all over the media they don't normally react like this.
Was it channel 10 you contacted first ? from there Andrew Jacob's(Sydney Observatory) was informed? than the reast is history.

People are confused if this other light was over the street light or not.
This will help some.


regards
Zelong.



posted on Mar, 28 2010 @ 05:27 PM
link   
reply to post by missfee
 

Any other errors in your story you'd like to account for?
I hardly think you should be questioning anyone's intelligence at this point.



posted on Mar, 28 2010 @ 05:29 PM
link   
reply to post by spender
 


Once again, coming from the women's persuasion, we don't give a crap about the means nor model of our cars. I have claimed I drive a Nissan when I really drive a Toyota. Not to dupe the mechanic only due to....I don't care! It's a moot point in our lives.
(what type of dish soap do you gentleman use?.....Yeah, didn't think so!)
You're all making her car a focal point.

To me (and Fiona?) it was only her transportation.

Be it as it may.


Take over Fiona.

Stand up tall. Answer these questions because you know what? They are points they want to hear to substantiate their point of view.

Whatever.
Go at it.................and don't hold back.



posted on Mar, 28 2010 @ 05:53 PM
link   
reply to post by zazzafrazz
 


What I mean is that in some of the photos we see that they get bluer (is that a real word?) the closer we get to the top of the photo, but that's not something in the way the sky looked, because, as you can see in this post, the blue from one photo appears in the same place as the normal looking clouds in the other photo.

Does that help?



posted on Mar, 28 2010 @ 06:03 PM
link   
Im going to suggest one possible scenario that covers what might have happened here. When these street lights are going bad they have a tendency to turn themselves off and on. Fiona gets ready to take some pictures of the sunset. the streetlight turns on , and two birds fly behind it illuminated by both the sunset and the lamp. The light blinks off. (ufo vanishes). I also believe however that the pictures were taken from within the auto , more because of the black spot than anything else.



posted on Mar, 28 2010 @ 06:09 PM
link   
reply to post by TwoPhish
 


well, if thats what you are saying, then what credibility the observer might have, will be thrown out the window and wont be taken seriously and your story would be ripped apart, simply black and white are not the same....



posted on Mar, 28 2010 @ 06:29 PM
link   
reply to post by missfee
 


The issue with the photo's with an anomaly that is being said to be the windscreen reflection IMG_0432.JPG and IMG_0433.JPG

Just to clear up some questions, all these photo's were taken when you were out of your cruiser Yes? none were taken inside the cruiser.
And
Was it channel 10 you contacted first ? from there Andrew Jacob's(Sydney Observatory) was informed? than the rest is history.

People are confused if this other light was over the street light or not?


Zelong.



posted on Mar, 28 2010 @ 06:36 PM
link   
Re the tinted windscreen theory, its possible (see below). An image of the witness vehical's windscreen would clear that up.


The Special Edition PT Cruiser includes the following unique equipment:
•Brilliant Black exterior paint
•17-inch SRT Design wheels
•Solid billet chrome aluminium upper grille
•Chrome body side trim spars, front accents and door lock knobs
•Premium cloth trim with heated front seats
•Leather wrapped steering wheel with bright spokes
•AM/FM/6-disc CD audio system
•6 Boston Acoustics® premium speakers and 368- watt amplifier
•Sunroof with tilt and slide functions
•Deep tint sunscreen glass
•Premium floor mats


www.chrysler.com.au...

This 2001 model (same as the witness car) does have tinting (third thumbnail)

www.drive.com.au...


cars.watoday.com.au...

[edit on 28-3-2010 by wayaboveitall]



posted on Mar, 28 2010 @ 07:33 PM
link   
All Australian sold cars have the blue tint across the top.

Well picked Armap I didn't even notice that.




posted on Mar, 28 2010 @ 08:07 PM
link   
reply to post by ArMaP
 


cool armap, thx i must have missed your post with that image.

not definitive that's caused by a tint, but good spotting.

edit it to add CHAD my cars have dark grey tint not blue


[edit on 28-3-2010 by zazzafrazz]



posted on Mar, 28 2010 @ 08:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by Chadwickus
All Australian sold cars have the blue tint across the top.

Well picked Armap I didn't even notice that.



G'day Chadwickus

Mine doesn't.....I just looked at it & here's one of the photos through it.....



Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not

[edit on 28-3-2010 by Maybe...maybe not]



posted on Mar, 28 2010 @ 08:26 PM
link   
reply to post by zazzafrazz
 


lol ok I'll rephrase.


All cars sold in Australia must have a shade band across the top of the windscreen, the typical colour is blue, but other colours can be used.

Second rephrase, perhaps each state has different regulations...

Been looking for some sort of ADR's on it with no luck.


Geez I'm doing well today


[edit on 28/3/10 by Chadwickus]



posted on Mar, 28 2010 @ 08:56 PM
link   
reply to post by Maybe...maybe not
 


Fiona Hartigan's windscreen doesn't look tinted from the pictures Maybe...maybe not, took at the scene inside her cruiser.
reply to post by Maybe...maybe not
 





Zelong.



posted on Mar, 28 2010 @ 08:59 PM
link   
reply to post by Zelong
 


It is possible that the tint was missed in this photo, after all we can see the bonnet in this pic and we couldnt in the pics posted by Fiona.





new topics

top topics



 
33
<< 43  44  45    47  48  49 >>

log in

join