It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

UFO in Sydney Australia

page: 29
33
<< 26  27  28    30  31  32 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 26 2010 @ 07:40 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 




posted on Mar, 26 2010 @ 07:43 PM
link   
MOD NOTE: The topic of this thread is: UFO in Sydney Australia Not individual members posting here. If you have a genuine complaint or concern about a fellow member, contact staff by using the alert button, do not post about it on the thread.

You may also use the ATS Complaint / Suggestion form– Please Use This Link.


And do not tell other members whether or not they can post on this thread. It is open to everyone and all opinons on the matter.

All off topic posts and attacks on other members will be actioned!

Mod Note: Courtesy Is Mandatory – Please Review This Link.

[edit on March 26th 2010 by greeneyedleo]



posted on Mar, 26 2010 @ 07:49 PM
link   
honestly to me it just looks like someone let go of a small balloon.



posted on Mar, 26 2010 @ 08:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by gpena
honestly to me it just looks like someone let go of a small balloon.


No disrespect but............we are so beyond a balloon thought!
The forensic team is now on hand *smile


MMN? I apologize for my outburst, I just want to know the truth like....yesterday!



posted on Mar, 26 2010 @ 08:19 PM
link   
Why are people going down to the site and taking iPhone photos
inside a car window when it was outside on the hood.
Lets get the same car and some balloons and say see thats all
she did.
Sort of a recon tomfoolery.
She got the photo and no one else, live with it.



posted on Mar, 26 2010 @ 08:29 PM
link   
reply to post by bluemooone2
 


That sure looks like a VW Bus perhaps.
What is the reflection doing over there and so small.
Assuming there was an enlargement.
I think there was a vehicle in one of the photos.
The iPhone might have a glass cover for the lens.



posted on Mar, 26 2010 @ 08:44 PM
link   
reply to post by TwoPhish
 



Chill my friend. I don't have a ton of time at the moment. I'm going to plot the GPS data in Google Earth then post either the plots or a screenshot here. I think You'll get a better idea of what I'm talking about.

T.



posted on Mar, 26 2010 @ 08:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by TeslaandLyne
Why are people going down to the site and taking iPhone photos
inside a car window when it was outside on the hood.
Lets get the same car and some balloons and say see thats all
she did.
Sort of a recon tomfoolery.
She got the photo and no one else, live with it.



But even if you can duplicate this event (with mock prompts) there are still extenuating circumstances (weather, road conditions, angle) where you can not possibly duplicate that day!

At this point, the best way to 'break the case' is to go into her personal history! *as much as I hate to!*
But does she have a recorded record of mental meltdowns?
Was she in the habit of reporting false alarms, (like: Munchausen by Proxy syndrome?) Does she seeks attention/fame?


Aside from doing the ol' Patriot Act Invasion (sorry 'bout that) I think we have to render her.............clear.

But, to go on record, something is still very fishy about this whole ordeal!



posted on Mar, 26 2010 @ 08:51 PM
link   
reply to post by wayaboveitall
 


I think we're working at the same thing here. Unless we can verify the location the pictures were're taken from; speculation over the nature of the blob is moot. To be honest, I've barely even looked at the photos themselves.

T.



posted on Mar, 26 2010 @ 09:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by Triangulum
reply to post by TwoPhish
 



Chill my friend. I don't have a ton of time at the moment. I'm going to plot the GPS data in Google Earth then post either the plots or a screenshot here. I think You'll get a better idea of what I'm talking about.

T.


Put yourself in her shoes. (I know I am anyway)

If she/I reported an incredible incident (an UFO sighting with......photos) on a particular day (for argument sake, on March 21st 2010 in southeast Florida) do you REALLY think you can replicate that day now?

Even if I said I was doing a head-stand, on a sailboat, at low-tide, facing east, at 5PM.. and snapped a photo.......... do you REALLY think you can debunk and duplicate that.... days later??

It really comes down to trust.

I trusted this whole story. At first.
But the more I got involved...the more 'mystery' popped up!



posted on Mar, 26 2010 @ 09:28 PM
link   
reply to post by TwoPhish
 


The photos were taken to confirm the orange orb was the street lamp, and to indicate reflection form car interior as requested by thread participants. The main purpose was to get the raw data. Not the new photos. And that was a successful research outcome.



posted on Mar, 26 2010 @ 09:42 PM
link   
G'day

Internos & I have been doing some more work on this case.

We have focused on the GPS position & altitude data.....the results are very interesting.

The witness stated to me that she took the photos whilst leaning against the front of her car facing forwards.....i.e. she was stationary & facing west.

The GPS data attached to photos 2 & 3 (remember that photo 1 did not include GPS data) indicated the following movement of the iPhone between photo's 2 & 3:

- There was movement to the east

- The distance traversed was 184.8 feet (56.33 meters)

- The time taken to traverse the 184.8 feet (56.33 meters) was 11 seconds

- The altitude increased by 29.5 feet (8.99 meters)

Here is photo 2:



Here is photo 3:



Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not

[edit on 26-3-2010 by Maybe...maybe not]



posted on Mar, 26 2010 @ 10:02 PM
link   
reply to post by Maybe...maybe not
 

reply to post by zazzafrazz
 


Honestly.............in my deepest level of love and acceptance, what ARE you both getting at???

It's too technical (for me anyways)

Did she or did she not, hoax this event?

I think it took less for the 9-11 (bogus) committee to render their thoughts than this!



posted on Mar, 26 2010 @ 10:04 PM
link   
reply to post by Maybe...maybe not
 


Once again! What does this mean?


Maybe, Maybe Not....


Please know, maybe, maybe not there are less than scientific scholars reading this.
So what is your analysis and..................conclusion, if you will?



posted on Mar, 26 2010 @ 10:09 PM
link   
G'day

In the interest of making all info available.....

I have been forwarded an e-mail sourced from the Sydney Observatory stating the claim they have.....



"verified the photo as being genuine & not tampered with"


.....is



"not true"


I cannot post the e-mail because I have not yet been given permission to do so.

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not



posted on Mar, 26 2010 @ 10:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by TwoPhish

Honestly.............in my deepest level of love and acceptance, what ARE you both getting at???
It's too technical (for me anyways)
Did she or did she not, hoax this event?
I think it took less for the 9-11 (bogus) committee to render their thoughts than this!


Data says that basically the GPS data indicate that the witness covered 184.8 feet (56.33 meters) towards east within 11 seconds, try by yourself to do the same, and you'll get what exactly it means. And 9/11 has nothing to do with it.



posted on Mar, 26 2010 @ 10:18 PM
link   
hi all, im new to posting here but ive been a reader for a very very long time, ive finally decided to sign up after reading this fantastic thread, i would first like to say a big thanks for the great contribution, knowledge and logical thought of some of the people in this thread. now for my first contribution. as stated the time between all the pictures is 33 seconds, the problem im seeing is that the main object (blob) hasn't moved very far in 33 seconds, now if we attributable this time to any known man man made flying craft then any plane would surely be out of sight within that time or would fall from the sky, so laws of physics rule that out imo... .also if it was a helicopter it would have made enough noise at that distance to be obvious to the witness, especially if she was outside the car as claimed. the moment i saw the pictures i thought they were suspicious because of the object being so blurry in comparison to the background. my conclusion is that phage has been correct all along....



posted on Mar, 26 2010 @ 10:19 PM
link   
The Sydney Observatory?
really? ok um ............Sydney Observatory . OK now interested. do tell please



posted on Mar, 26 2010 @ 10:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by bluemooone2
The Sydney Observatory?
really? ok um ............Sydney Observatory . OK now interested. do tell please


G'day bluemooone2

There was a claim the Sydney Observatory stated the photo's were legitimate.

Sydney Observatory states that did not occur.

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not

[edit on 26-3-2010 by Maybe...maybe not]



posted on Mar, 26 2010 @ 10:23 PM
link   
KK I beleive i misread your post more or less sry) my bad . moo moo moomoomoo



new topics

top topics



 
33
<< 26  27  28    30  31  32 >>

log in

join