It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by FireMoon
For crying out loud. She says she saw a "big orange light". It was a streetlight. How hard is that to figure out. She wasn't traumatized.
You're a hell of a researcher. Tell me, do you use hypnotic regression too?
Those superfluous pictures are interrupting the flow of the discussion.
Can you save them for later?
I believe she said she was 5'2" and it took 8-seconds to snap all five photos.
Date: March 21, 2010 7:18:37PM
Date: March 21, 2010 7:18:41PM
Date: March 21, 2010 7:18:52PM
Date: March 21, 2010 7:19:05PM
Originally posted by missfee
reply to post by phatpackage
my story has not changed this is just an other theroy / opinon i was out of my car leaning on the bonet and im sorry Maybe..maybe not your recreation photos never came out the way you wanted them to but REALY
sticking gum to your windscreen and taking shots with an IPHONE if thats what you call an investagation then excluding the truth than i think i have brought this to the rong peoples attention maybe the investagater from the american goverment who is ariveing monday can get to the bottom of it
the interior of my pt cruiser is dark gray and material not even leather i was out of the car i have asked this before could the reflection be a car coming towards me from behind could that make the reflection you are all talking about apear in the pic
Originally posted by zazzafrazz
reply to post by internos
THx for the analysis, I haven't had a chance to review any of maybe maybe not's observations, but I did notice Internos that you wrote "something is missing" Can you be more specific what you meant by that?
Mile Grazie Bello!
Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by internos
Two questions if I may internos?
What are your thoughts on the two small orbs?
If you are going to cover this in your analysis I can wait.
Oh and is it possible to share the 5th hires image with us?
(Yes I have a theory lol)
[edit on 26/3/10 by Chadwickus]
Originally posted by tyranny22
The most telling giveaway is that you can see detail in the whiffs of clouds, yet the area around the edge of the object remains fuzzy.
Originally posted by wayaboveitall
reply to post by Maybe...maybe not
33 seconds, while travelling the distance between a few streetlights.
How fast can Fiona run along the side of the road, while snapping photos on her iphone?
Its not an olympic sport yet is it?
Internos Cam data shows those four pics were shot in a 33second series.
The images themselves show the veiwer is advancing down the road in the direction the shots are taken. How long does it take the phone to be ready for the next shot after you click it? I imagine its processed on the fly? and appears on the screen? With most phones theres a breif pause while it loads the image no?
Can anyone verify that?
Then she has to aim the camera, since shes following this 'object'. Does she use the screen veiwer to line the shot up first? Or just keep snapping?
Afterall she beleives she is seeing a ufo.
Theres 5 shots, over 33 seconds.
Did she stop the car on the shoulder and get out, to shoot all 5 pics?
Or did she slowly drive along the shoulder (jogging opace), and snap 5 photos from inside the car ?
Originally posted by TwoPhish
Is it at all possible that this bone of contention; this 'glare, was caused by light reflecting back UPWARDS into the camera's lens (causing a prism-like anomoly) from the grounds surface???