It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SLAYER69
Yeah I have served....
As my grandfather and father, my uncles, myself and my brothers. Now my son and his cousins are serving. We are patriots. We love this country and for all that the founding fathers stood for.
We have Served.
***snip***
FINE we said....
***snip***
FINE we said....
***snip***
FINE we said....
***snip***
FINE we said....
***snip***
FINE we said....
***snip***
NOT FINE ANYMORE!
***snip***
NOT FINE ANYMORE!
You'll make some payments on the debt with the interest but nowhere near enough to pay the debt down.
But...
It'll look like you made some progress with reducing it.
NOT FINE ANYMORE!
***snip***
To date, $1.05 trillion dollars have been allocated to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The national, state, and local numbers we provide are based on the total approved amounts through the end of Fiscal Year 2010.
Originally posted by mr-lizard
Slayer i agree with everything you said...
But in my 'ignorance' - i fail to see why you don't want health care for those who cannot afford it?
You'd think in a time like this, those without money (lost jobs, homes etc) would be relying on their fellow man to assist them...?
Originally posted by silentthought38
reply to post by mr-lizard
I'm afraid his children won't be given a fair chance. In fact, no child in America will be given a fair chance. Not even the PR posterchild that Obama enlisted as he signed the healthcare bill.
Even if we don't consider the cost of this healthcare bill, the already mounting debt that we will be giving our children will eventually come crashing down upon them. If not them, then maybe their children. We shall see how long the gov't can hold up their house of cards.
So to be blunt, our progeny will have no use for fairer national healthcare if there is no longer a nation.
[edit on 23-3-2010 by silentthought38]
Originally posted by Darkrunner
I think it's a safe bet that this will be repealed. Expect a culling of the democrats in November. Here in my home state of Michigan, people are calling for Stupak's head on a platter.
I don't see this lasting.
ILLEGAL ANTI-REPEAL PROVISION BURIED INSIDE THE BILL
Buried within the massive amendment to the Senate version of the Health Care legislation inserted by Senator Harry Reid of Nevada is an illegal clause which purports to bind Congress in the future from repealing Section 3403. In the United Kingdom, no House of Commons can bind its successor, and the same principle applies in the United States. The offending clause reads:
‘It shall not be in order in the Senate or the House of Representatives to consider any bill, resolution, amendment or conference report that would repeal or otherwise change this subsection’.
The subsection, starting on page 1,000 of this convoluted Talmudic legislation, concerns the regulatory power of the Independent Medicare Advisory Board (IMAB) to ‘reduce the per capita rate of growth of Medicare spending’.
ANTI-REPEAL CLAUSE = CHANGE IN SENATE ‘PROCEDURES’, NOT IN SENATE RULES
In order to procure the ‘legality’ of the provision that this subsection cannot ever be repealed or changed in the future, the (Reid-controlled) Senate Parliamentarian has ruled, in a classic example of nefarious ‘loopholeism’, that the anti-repeal provision does not constitute a change of Senate RULES, but rather of Senate ‘procedures’.
The reason for this is that for 200 years, changes in the Senate's standing rules have required approval by two-thirds of those voting – that is to say, 67 votes, rather than the 60 votes that Senator Reid’s amendment received.
Thus Senator Harry Reid flouted two centuries of standing US Senate rules to pass a measure in the dead of night (which these Dark Forces always try to do) that no Senator has read, and part of which can never be changed (although the anti-repeal provision is illegal).
Senator Reid is reported to have tossed aside an earlier assurance that Senators and the public would have 72 hours to read the language of his contributions to the Senate measure – because if the existence of this clause had been highlighted in time, there might have been an uproar.
Originally posted by SLAYER69
Yeah I have served....
As my grandfather and father, my uncles, myself and my brothers. Now my son and his cousins are serving. We are patriots. We love this country and for all that the founding fathers stood for.
We have Served.
You raised our taxes. FINE we said.... You supported our domestic companies moving overseas in search of higher corporate profits. FINE we said.... You wanted wars for resources FINE we said.... You said there was a bogyman out there that we needed to blow the crap out of FINE we said.... There were companies that needed to be bailed out or it would ruin the US economy. FINE we said....
It's bad enough that we take heat and CRAP for supporting you. It's bad enough we take BS on a daily bases from everybody becuase of your actions. But we will be DAMNED if we are going to sit here and take it anymore.
You are going to force some sort of half-assed Health Care reform that we have to pay for whether we like it or not whether we are sick or in need or not. Whether we can afford it or not...
NOT FINE ANYMORE!
Well the problem is I don't think alot of small businesses can afford this,going to have to lay off workers and whatnot.So other people are going to get screwed over on this bill.Just beause other people get healh care doe snot mean it is affordable or doe snot mean they will actualy get the care they realy need.However they will get insurance they never had.But the question is at what cost?This is where alot of Obama supporters and liberals seem to be clueless over real pratical common sense for paying for this..I honestly think Obama and his admin know this cannot be promised to everyone like it is.It is misleading and we all will be forced to pay for it eventually.
Originally posted by mr-lizard
Slayer i agree with everything you said...
But in my 'ignorance' - i fail to see why you don't want health care for those who cannot afford it?
You'd think in a time like this, those without money (lost jobs, homes etc) would be relying on their fellow man to assist them...?